Jump to content

I drove the Chevy City Express! Well, kinda...


Zane

Recommended Posts

Posted

Two days ago I had a chance to drive the new Nissan NV200...which will eventually be re-badged and sold as the Chevrolet City Express.

 

Honestly, I wasn't too excited before-hand. It's just a work van, right? Well, surprisingly, behind the wheel I enjoyed it quite a bit.

 

This is a very nice work tool. Yes, a tool. You're not going to want to buy a City Express to haul your family around but it's going to be hard to beat for many small business who deliver or are constantly on the move.

 

So, why did Chevy partner with Nissan instead of building their own? Nissan manufactures the NV200 in the USA. That's a big deal when it comes to Cargo Vans.

 

Read on for more information here and how Ford skirts a 25% import tax for importing foreign made cargo vehicles: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125357990638429655.html

 

Chevrolet most likely had no option other than importing their own van from overseas or buying one made in the USA. Nissan turns out to be a great choice.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_03.jpg

There will be little cosmetic changes when the NV200 is rebadged. So, expect it to look a lot like this.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_04.jpg

For as compact as it is on the outside, the NV200/City Express is huge inside.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_05.jpg

Not luxurious, the NV200 offers a navigation system, backup camera, and places to organize paperwork. It gets the job done.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_06.jpg

The rear has built in attachment points for up-fitters or customers to utilize. No need to bolt, drill, weld, or otherwise modify the vehicle to attach racks or shelves.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_11.jpg

The rear doors are a 40/60 split, biased towards the passenger side. Less door overhang out into the road! The doors also open at 90 and 180 degrees.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_08.jpg

Standard run of the mill gauges. Nothing fancy.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_09.jpg

Only 131-horsepower but with 1,500lbs of cargo capacity and a light body, the NV200 / City Express moves pretty well. The CVT transmission is perfect for this type of vehicle

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_12.jpg

Squared off and compact wheel wells are great for stacking boxes, racks, or other items that wouldn't fit well with rounded corners.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_07.jpg

The NV200 has a tight ~30ft turning radius. Great for tight alleys and sharp corners you'll find in the city.

 

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_10.jpg

It's not a looker but will get the job done all day long.

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_03.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_04.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_05.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_06.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_07.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_08.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_09.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_10.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_11.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_12.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_03.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_04.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_05.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_06.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_07.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_08.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_09.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_10.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_11.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_12.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_03.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_04.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_05.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_06.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_07.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_08.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_09.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_10.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_11.jpg

Nissan_NV200_Cargo_12.jpg

Posted

chevy should sell rebadged fullsize NV vans.... they are way better then the current express

Hate to agree but you are right. The full-size NV vans are cutting out a devoted niche with their customers. It's a work van made to be a work van. Not a passenger van adapted to be a work van, like the Express.

Posted

i agree, GM should focus on making a redesigned FULLSIZE van with a big GVWR and a fuel efficent engine... there is a huge gap in the market there.. sprinters are not the van of the future.. to expensive, unreliable and they prone to rust.

 

Ford is supposed to be coming out with a fullsize transit... supposed to be impressive but we'll see

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...