Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Perhaps I did not understand the process. I also have projectors. I had thought folks were disassembling factory headlights and replacing the projector units.

You are correct. I replaced my factory projectors in my 2014 Sierra with Morimoto projectors. Totally worth the effort of the install.
  • Like 1
Posted
Perhaps I did not understand the process. I also have projectors. I had thought folks were disassembling factory headlights and replacing the projector units.

That may be the case with some but the morimoto kits from TRS just require some wiring and a bulb replacement. I removed the air box and the plastic cover above the grill under the hood and the only reason I removed the cover was to conceal my wires and relays.

That kit is SUPER simple and well worth the money. If my wife’s car wasn’t a lease, I’d be doing it in a heart beat. I even did my mother in laws edge with that kit. Truly night and day difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
28 minutes ago, catpartsman said:


That may be the case with some but the morimoto kits from TRS just require some wiring and a bulb replacement. I removed the air box and the plastic cover above the grill under the hood and the only reason I removed the cover was to conceal my wires and relays.

That kit is SUPER simple and well worth the money. If my wife’s car wasn’t a lease, I’d be doing it in a heart beat. I even did my mother in laws edge with that kit. Truly night and day difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is more along the line of my current capabilities. I became disabled a few years back.

Posted

He just added an HID kit to the oem halogen projectors.  Some guys, like myself, prefer the performance of an HID projector, because the projector is manufactured to use an HID bulb for maximum output.  Silverado's are very easy to swap, while the Sierra's require you to open up the headlight to swap the projector.

Posted

I swapped out my sierra projectors for d2s mini 4.0. I thought it was pretty strange that the oem projector seemed very high quality. As in build quality. Better than the d2s.

 

The actual beam sucked on the oem, but the hardware was nice. Very odd, almost like they intentionally made it that way. The lack of a sharp cutoff on the oem is because the lense is intentionally not smooth.

Posted

I got mine installed last week and I do have some issues, all on the passenger side. I took everything apart and I've improved the rotation a little bit, but it's still not a clean cutoff. As you can also see, the passenger cutoff flares upwards. I've taken the whole thing apart, reinstalled the bulbs, tightened everything down but still has the bowl shape. Last item is that the passenger side doesn't seem as bright. Any suggestions on how to address these issues?

20190319_165410.jpg

Posted
I got mine installed last week and I do have some issues, all on the passenger side. I took everything apart and I've improved the rotation a little bit, but it's still not a clean cutoff. As you can also see, the passenger cutoff flares upwards. I've taken the whole thing apart, reinstalled the bulbs, tightened everything down but still has the bowl shape. Last item is that the passenger side doesn't seem as bright. Any suggestions on how to address these issues?
20190319_165410.thumb.jpg.26d63143809b1c2f67ec27deaa0db641.jpg
That passenger side really looks like a bulb alignment issue. Is this the D2S 5.0?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
3 minutes ago, FastWS6TA said:

That passenger side really looks like a bulb alignment issue. Is this the D2S 5.0?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

Yes it is - I originally had the rubber washer on that side and not on the diver's side so when I had it apart this weekend, I pulled the rubber washer off and just tightened it all down. Think I still need to do something extra in there to push the bulb into place?

Posted
Yes it is - I originally had the rubber washer on that side and not on the diver's side so when I had it apart this weekend, I pulled the rubber washer off and just tightened it all down. Think I still need to do something extra in there to push the bulb into place?
When you move the bulb by hand does it make the light output look better. Like can you seem to get it in a spot that makes it look correct?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
5 minutes ago, FastWS6TA said:

When you move the bulb by hand does it make the light output look better. Like can you seem to get it in a spot that makes it look correct?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

I'll have to give it a try. The power that goes into those make me nervous so I didn't get in there with my hands at all with the lights on. I'll see if I can get in to the back of the bulb this weekend and see if I can move it and report back.

 

Could the dimmer light be due to the bulb position in addition to the pattern?

Posted
I'll have to give it a try. The power that goes into those make me nervous so I didn't get in there with my hands at all with the lights on. I'll see if I can get in to the back of the bulb this weekend and see if I can move it and report back.
 
Could the dimmer light be due to the bulb position in addition to the pattern?
Yes sir. Typically a distortion in the beam pattern is due to bulb position. Really nothing to go wrong with the projector typically. Issues with this type of retrofit are typically:
Bulb put of position or rotated
Bad ballast (doesnt fire)

These issues are not "common", but when there is an issue it would tend to be one of the above. I feel yours is bulb position.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

Looks shitty.

727d4181d7a8023e2949ec8f7ec64c6e.jpg

A little less shitty.

be605dc236f26c8ecf1fbe2a31d17ef6.jpg

Now we’re talking. [emoji41]

880764464dddb4ee96a524508c50f5b7.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

Need a little help trouble shooting. I bought the TRS 35w/4500k kit a few weeks ago and I'm just getting around to installing it. Everything is wired up but I'm not getting anything from either headlight. I checked the polarity of all wires/connectors and everything is black:black or clear:red:red. Battery+ and Battery- are secure at their respective terminals. I believe I have a good ground at the strut above the airbox. I used sandpaper to get to bare metal on that little nutsert. Is that correct or should I file that down until it is flush with the radiator support? Any other ideas of what my problem might be? Thanks. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Jfaulk said:

Need a little help trouble shooting. I bought the TRS 35w/4500k kit a few weeks ago and I'm just getting around to installing it. Everything is wired up but I'm not getting anything from either headlight. I checked the polarity of all wires/connectors and everything is black:black or clear:red:red. Battery+ and Battery- are secure at their respective terminals. I believe I have a good ground at the strut above the airbox. I used sandpaper to get to bare metal on that little nutsert. Is that correct or should I file that down until it is flush with the radiator support? Any other ideas of what my problem might be? Thanks. 

Switch your polarity. I had the same issue too. The clear is negative and the black is positive. They have it indicated on the other end of the plug, a + /-  is shown on there to confirm. Flip them and you should be good. 

 

- Adam 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...