Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good looking truck! Did you remove the stock rear block? I have 2.5" level in front and ride about 1" high without a trailer load. I want to add a rear block.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes I have the RC rear block in there. However I still have 1" of rake, every truck must be slightly different. Only I can tell though, because I look at it all the time and it kind of annoys me but its definitely better to have for towing

Posted

 

Yes I have the RC rear block in there. However I still have 1" of rake, every truck must be slightly different. Only I can tell though, because I look at it all the time and it kind of annoys me but its definitely better to have for towing

Cool. Thanks for the follow up. I went with a ProRyde adjustable leveling kit and nothing in the back. The front is leveled 2.5" and it sits 1" high up front. ProRyde makes a rear block that is 1-3/4" so in removing the 1" stock block I should be very close to level or maybe even a very slight rake, maybe 3/4"? How does the truck ride with the rear block added and stock removed? I'm running 305 55 20. AT2

 

Thanks . Slick looking truck

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Cool. Thanks for the follow up. I went with a ProRyde adjustable leveling kit and nothing in the back. The front is leveled 2.5" and it sits 1" high up front. ProRyde makes a rear block that is 1-3/4" so in removing the 1" stock block I should be very close to level or maybe even a very slight rake, maybe 3/4"? How does the truck ride with the rear block added and stock removed? I'm running 305 55 20. AT2

 

Thanks . Slick looking truck

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks, again I can't notice much difference from the stock ride. I'm running 295/55/R20 AT2. It's a little bouncy over speed bumps which is annoying but I don't think that's anything to do with the level

Posted

Anyone have pics of a before and after of someone that started with the 2" level, then added the top spacer to go to 2.5"? I'm trying to determine how noticeable the extra 0.5" is. I already have the parts for the 2", but I'd have to order the top spacer so I'm wondering if it's worth it.

Posted (edited)

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

Edited by sensinitas
Posted

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

 

out of curiosity.... wont a fully loaded bed change the alignment? Even if you lower the truck and have it aligned with a dry weight. Once you put 2000lbs you'll load the front suspension. You may not be in positive camber but negative. It actually sounds to me that you would need a helper spring on the rear suspension or a weight distributive trailer.

Posted (edited)

 

out of curiosity.... wont a fully loaded bed change the alignment? Even if you lower the truck and have it aligned with a dry weight. Once you put 2000lbs you'll load the front suspension. You may not be in positive camber but negative. It actually sounds to me that you would need a helper spring on the rear suspension or a weight distributive trailer.

Yes you are correct. I guess I was hoping removing the upper spacer wouldn't put he suspension so close to the end of its limits. I didn't have this problem prior to the leveling kit Edited by sensinitas
Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is where I was a little while ago but kept researching as I didn't have the funds and was waiting to buy new tires. Since then, I decided that the Bilsteins are not really adjustable. You pick a height, install, align and hope you picked the right height! If you get it wrong, you have to remove the shock, adjust and reinstall. It is more labour intensive to replace a shock than a bottom spacer. Instead of buying an add-a-leaf kit. my local spring shop will fabricate one to my particular height and load specifications. When I buy my next set of tires I'm going to have a 1.5" bottom of strut kit installed and have a leaf added when/if I get another trailer!

Posted

Anyone have pics of a before and after of someone that started with the 2" level, then added the top spacer to go to 2.5"? I'm trying to determine how noticeable the extra 0.5" is. I already have the parts for the 2", but I'd have to order the top spacer so I'm wondering if it's worth it.

 

You can't tell the .5 difference so it's only worth it if you are going to push the limits on your tire size. .5 will be important if you want to run 295 or 305.....not so much if you want to run 275 or 285.

Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

Add a leaf kits will ruin your ride.....better put in some glue on your teeth. Air bags are a better option for occasional weight in the rear.

Posted

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

 

Why not add the rear block or extra leaf?

Posted

Looking for a little advise. I installed Motofab 1.5 lower spacer about 4K miles ago and I am happy with the way it sits. Ride has gotten a little rough now with 14k miles. It seems like I can feel every bump on every road. Question is do I go with Fox 2.0 or replace the Goodyear SRA's to smooth out the ride. I was waiting to see about the Bilstein 6112 but couldn't wait. Had to level it. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. cc714ca2b9b9826c5d4a92db47d62877.jpgpost-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

Posted

Looking for a little advise. I installed Motofab 1.5 lower spacer about 4K miles ago and I am happy with the way it sits. Ride has gotten a little rough now with 14k miles. It seems like I can feel every bump on every road. Question is do I go with Fox 2.0 or replace the Goodyear SRA's to smooth out the ride. I was waiting to see about the Bilstein 6112 but couldn't wait. Had to level it. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. cc714ca2b9b9826c5d4a92db47d62877.jpgattachicon.gifImage1467944086.161079.jpg

Those SRA's are probably the softest tire you're going to get. I think you should drive something with an LT tire for a week then hop back in yours and realize it's not that bad. It's all relevant, it tends to seem worse than it is if it's bothering you.

 

Consider the bilstein 5100s ?

Posted

Haven't seen many that think the 5100's improve the ride. I would stay with P rated Nitto or Toyo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Your right on. 👍🏻
    • Seats matter a lot.  I would start there - good advise here.  I had a 2018 LT Colorado before my 2026 LT Silverado, and the seats are so much better in the new one it's not even a contest.  That was one thing I always hated about the Colorado and I owned two of them spanning 10 years - but I did it so I could park in the garage mainly.  Now I have a much larger property and a huge barn so I have plenty of parking options and a full size is more useful for maintaining the property and current hobbies as well.  I wasn't evenb thinking about the seats as part of the reason for the move to the Silverado, but after two back to back 700mile road trips I am sold on the LT seats w/ leather 100%.  The other LT features are also nice - one thing I really like is the power rear window on the back window by the bed.  And the lighting in the bed is also very nice to have - I doubt that comes on the lower models.  Power tailgate - also quite useful - it's a heavy slug!  What else - I could take or leave the screen - but heated seats and steering wheel and cruise control on the steering wheel is very useable - I would never want to live without that.  Even the colorados had that.
    • I think the ship has sailed on the fuel injection type - everything is getting direct now.  Does it help with mpg?  Not really and nobody buying a HD truck really cares anyway.  But that is what it is at this point.  Piston rings is something they may well adjust over time to get them right.
    • I don’t have detailed measurement data, but this past March we were hiking and camping in Death Valley and the Las Vegas area when this Spring’s heat wave hit with 105 plus temperatures and our 2021 L8T system kept our crew cab as cool as we wanted it (68F setting) with no trouble. Fan flows on auto once stabilized were fairly low. It seems like the OP’s system should be performing better. 
    • Yes that's correct on the route to Durango - we just followed what google maps recommended.  That is quite the pass btw - very steep going back down.  I didn't even need manual mode - I just used cruise control and set the truck at 50 I think when it was a 45 posted speed and for the most part it just held it there by keeping it in the right gear - everyonce in awhile there is a sharper turn that I just braked for - but it was pretty smooth going down it on both sides.  Amazing views around there for sure - we had no real time to stop, were on the clock for a set-up time, but we did stop in some 2 horse town somewhere a couple hours oustide of Durango in the middle of nowhere for burgers.   And yes - lots up up and downs on the Durango trip but I think it's a big difference going 70 vs. going 80-83 with the aero in play with these big trucks.  Even the much smaller Colorado does reallt bad on gas going up over 70, I think I would have been lucky to get 18 on that trip in the Colorado honestly.  The full size is definately more comfy for a long road trip too, and the amount of gear we had would have meant two vehicles if I still had the Colorado.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...