Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good looking truck! Did you remove the stock rear block? I have 2.5" level in front and ride about 1" high without a trailer load. I want to add a rear block.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes I have the RC rear block in there. However I still have 1" of rake, every truck must be slightly different. Only I can tell though, because I look at it all the time and it kind of annoys me but its definitely better to have for towing

Posted

 

Yes I have the RC rear block in there. However I still have 1" of rake, every truck must be slightly different. Only I can tell though, because I look at it all the time and it kind of annoys me but its definitely better to have for towing

Cool. Thanks for the follow up. I went with a ProRyde adjustable leveling kit and nothing in the back. The front is leveled 2.5" and it sits 1" high up front. ProRyde makes a rear block that is 1-3/4" so in removing the 1" stock block I should be very close to level or maybe even a very slight rake, maybe 3/4"? How does the truck ride with the rear block added and stock removed? I'm running 305 55 20. AT2

 

Thanks . Slick looking truck

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Cool. Thanks for the follow up. I went with a ProRyde adjustable leveling kit and nothing in the back. The front is leveled 2.5" and it sits 1" high up front. ProRyde makes a rear block that is 1-3/4" so in removing the 1" stock block I should be very close to level or maybe even a very slight rake, maybe 3/4"? How does the truck ride with the rear block added and stock removed? I'm running 305 55 20. AT2

 

Thanks . Slick looking truck

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks, again I can't notice much difference from the stock ride. I'm running 295/55/R20 AT2. It's a little bouncy over speed bumps which is annoying but I don't think that's anything to do with the level

Posted

Anyone have pics of a before and after of someone that started with the 2" level, then added the top spacer to go to 2.5"? I'm trying to determine how noticeable the extra 0.5" is. I already have the parts for the 2", but I'd have to order the top spacer so I'm wondering if it's worth it.

Posted (edited)

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

Edited by sensinitas
Posted

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

 

out of curiosity.... wont a fully loaded bed change the alignment? Even if you lower the truck and have it aligned with a dry weight. Once you put 2000lbs you'll load the front suspension. You may not be in positive camber but negative. It actually sounds to me that you would need a helper spring on the rear suspension or a weight distributive trailer.

Posted (edited)

 

out of curiosity.... wont a fully loaded bed change the alignment? Even if you lower the truck and have it aligned with a dry weight. Once you put 2000lbs you'll load the front suspension. You may not be in positive camber but negative. It actually sounds to me that you would need a helper spring on the rear suspension or a weight distributive trailer.

Yes you are correct. I guess I was hoping removing the upper spacer wouldn't put he suspension so close to the end of its limits. I didn't have this problem prior to the leveling kit Edited by sensinitas
Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is where I was a little while ago but kept researching as I didn't have the funds and was waiting to buy new tires. Since then, I decided that the Bilsteins are not really adjustable. You pick a height, install, align and hope you picked the right height! If you get it wrong, you have to remove the shock, adjust and reinstall. It is more labour intensive to replace a shock than a bottom spacer. Instead of buying an add-a-leaf kit. my local spring shop will fabricate one to my particular height and load specifications. When I buy my next set of tires I'm going to have a 1.5" bottom of strut kit installed and have a leaf added when/if I get another trailer!

Posted

Anyone have pics of a before and after of someone that started with the 2" level, then added the top spacer to go to 2.5"? I'm trying to determine how noticeable the extra 0.5" is. I already have the parts for the 2", but I'd have to order the top spacer so I'm wondering if it's worth it.

 

You can't tell the .5 difference so it's only worth it if you are going to push the limits on your tire size. .5 will be important if you want to run 295 or 305.....not so much if you want to run 275 or 285.

Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

Add a leaf kits will ruin your ride.....better put in some glue on your teeth. Air bags are a better option for occasional weight in the rear.

Posted

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

 

Why not add the rear block or extra leaf?

Posted

Looking for a little advise. I installed Motofab 1.5 lower spacer about 4K miles ago and I am happy with the way it sits. Ride has gotten a little rough now with 14k miles. It seems like I can feel every bump on every road. Question is do I go with Fox 2.0 or replace the Goodyear SRA's to smooth out the ride. I was waiting to see about the Bilstein 6112 but couldn't wait. Had to level it. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. cc714ca2b9b9826c5d4a92db47d62877.jpgpost-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

Posted

Looking for a little advise. I installed Motofab 1.5 lower spacer about 4K miles ago and I am happy with the way it sits. Ride has gotten a little rough now with 14k miles. It seems like I can feel every bump on every road. Question is do I go with Fox 2.0 or replace the Goodyear SRA's to smooth out the ride. I was waiting to see about the Bilstein 6112 but couldn't wait. Had to level it. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. cc714ca2b9b9826c5d4a92db47d62877.jpgattachicon.gifImage1467944086.161079.jpg

Those SRA's are probably the softest tire you're going to get. I think you should drive something with an LT tire for a week then hop back in yours and realize it's not that bad. It's all relevant, it tends to seem worse than it is if it's bothering you.

 

Consider the bilstein 5100s ?

Posted

Haven't seen many that think the 5100's improve the ride. I would stay with P rated Nitto or Toyo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I just bought this. A minimum for me but, I don`t work anymore and don`t want the heavy update costs of the higher end tools. You would have to make money with them.   https://www.topdon.us/collections/diagnostic-tools/products/artidiag-pro   Even this tool has a $250.00 update cost after 2 years.
    • I have an Autel, works great for what it is. Can't do some specific things because you need say the GM tool, VCDS for Audi/Volkswagon and others of course. But those times are few and far between for me.   The other tool I'd like to try one day is the new Topdon scan tools. Seen several video's on them and many youtube people review them.    I've never subscribed for updates or payed to do that stuff on my Autel, so I'm sure I'm missing out on some of the updates but I'm fine with that for now.
    • I am in the market for a bidirectional scan tool so was hoping someone can help point me in the right direction. There are so many options out there it is hard to narrow down which make/model to choose.   I have always done my own vehicle work so looking to maximize capability with the scanner. Ideal price is $1k or less but would be willing to exceed if it opens up significant benefits.  Currently my 24 2500 is the newest vehicle but also have a few mid to late 2010s Subarus as well.    It seems that the Autel MP900 has a decent amount of features at a reasonable price?
    • There was talk over the last couple of years that the contract to build these trucks between GM and International would not be renewed.  International moved production of all their other trucks besides the companion CV model out of the Springfield plant some time ago when they opened their San Antonio plant.  That left Springfield only building the Silverado Medium Duty, International CV Series, and some Express/Savanna long wheelbase cutaways.  International also put the plant up for sale some time ago.  This all answered my earlier question as to why GM and International did nothing with these trucks since they were introduced, as they had basically become a market 'placeholder' with a finite life.    The Silverado Medium Duty/International CV trucks were interesting combination of a GM powertrain, electrical system, and K2XX Silverado cab with an International chassis that was supposedly designed for a step-van type vehicle they never produced.  They were manufactured in International's Springfield plant along with the IH MV series initially.  When first introduced, there was much talk that the Silverado Medium Duty/CV would eventually get a gasoline engine option along with other upgrades and GM and IH would work on a class 6/7 joint venture truck.  This was before VW bought Navistar out, after that happened no more was said.  Draw your own conclusions...   About the time talk started that the GM/IH joint venture was not going to be renewed, rumors started that GM would develop a new line of medium duty trucks themselves.  The story is the new trucks will be part of the next generation HD's due in 2028, and will still feature a 'straight rail' chassis design that the current medium duty has.  GM views this as a desirable feature that differentiates their truck from the competition.  A gasoline engine option is also expected.  As the current Silverado Medium Duty remains in production until September 2026 and there is still a lot of inventory available do not expect any official word for some time.   I believe GM remains committed to their successful partnership with Isuzu, and all the LCF models will still be available from Chevy Commercial dealers.  Isuzu is on the cusp of opening a new large plant in South Carolina and there is also speculation that this may result in new product for both Isuzu and Chevy Commercial dealers.                  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...