Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was in the same dilemma not too long ago. I personally preferred aesthetic appearances over functionality (enjoying my youth at the expense of my wallet). The 275/65 looks nice from the side but I felt like the front/back view was more important because it's rare that somebody only sees the side directly without being at an angle of some sort. I wanted my truck to have a variety of good angles, as opposed to just two good sides.

 

Then when looking around at 305/55 tires, I came across the Nitto XL tires. They were only ~50 lbs of unsprung weight as opposed to the 58-62 lbs of most LT 305/55 tires. I don't regularly run trails or anything so I didn't feel the excess protection was necessary. Even the 275/65 BFG KO2 weighs ~57 I think. I lost some aerodynamics, and fuel economy, but not as much as if I'd have gone with an LT tire.

 

The sidewall of the KO2's are sexy, but the weight was a slight turn off. The mileage warranty was a plus for me in choosing the Nitto G2s. Just sharing my reasons for my decisions.

  • Like 1
Posted

Installed a 2.5in leveling kit and took it to the dealership to have them inspect my front suspension, torque all bolts to spec and get a front end alignment. 1 1/2 weeks later a bolt snapped on the upper control arm causing the tire to cave in. Needles to say in a huge argument with the dealership now because I believe they over torqued the bolt causing it to weaken and snap. Any experiences like this?

Posted (edited)

 

I'm just curious why you stayed with 275/65's instead of going with something wider? Maybe a 305/55R20? The diameter is only slightly different (33" with the 275/65's vs. 33.2" with the 305/55's.)

 

I suppose there is more patch contact area from a 305 vs a 275, so you will get a little more drag (ie. less fuel mileage) but I personally just think that the wider tires look so much better on a lifted/leveled truck.

 

From everything I've read it seems like the 305/55R20 will fit on a truck with at least a 2" level. There is a possibility for a very minor rub at full lock, but if it does it would be minor. Some people have stated they had a 2" level with zero rub on the 305's.

 

I just picked-up a 2017 GMC Sierra and put a 2.5" Motofab level kit on it, and am planning on putting 305/55R20 K02's on it in the next week or two. I was just curious if there was a fit issue that prevented you from going wider, or if it was just cost and fuel mileage.

 

Your truck looks great though! I've always like BFG's for all around tires. Not too noisey on the highway and great off-road in the woods.

Keep in mind tires vary in sizes by brand and AT vs MT. Generally a 305 55 in all terrain type will me smaller but its best to look for tire specs on their respective site. My 33x12.5 Federal mt measure 32.8x12.3" and would rub on the UCA on reverse and full lock turns. 1/4" wheels spacers fixed that

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by asalinasz39
Posted (edited)

Anybody run a 20x10 -24 on a 295/55r20?

 

I've seen a few 33x12.50 on -24 with claimed little rub on this thread, but no 295/55. Looking at the ridge grappler which specs 32.7x12.17, on a rough country 2.5 level. I have the cast steel arms, they are not stamped. This would be on a 2016 sierra not that it matters particularly

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by MOhunter92
Posted

Can anyone tell me the rim size on my 2016 Sierra with 265 65r18 stock rim? 18×8 or 18×9 ? Sorry I searched and nada

Posted

Can anyone tell me the rim size on my 2016 Sierra with 265 65r18 stock rim? 18×8 or 18×9 ? Sorry I searched and nada

18x8.5 +24 offset

Posted

Just picked up my truck from the shop:

 

 

2014 Sierra 1500 - 2WD

2.5 inch front level

2 inch rear block

275/65/20 - Toyo Open Country A/T II

 

No rubbing at all. post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I put a Pro Comp 2.25" leveling kit and Zone 1.5" body lift on mine. Cost less than half the price of a 4" suspension lift and rides like factory still.

 

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

My leveling kit just came in the mail today and I have some concerns with the Rough Country 2" Leveling Kit spacers being made out of a plastic type material. Has anyone had any issues?

Edited by Isidro____
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

My leveling kit just came in the mail today and I have some concerns with the Rough Country 2" Leveling Kit spacers being made out of a plastic type material. Has anyone had any issues?

Those polymer spacers are pretty tough. Go into the garage and hit it with your 5lb maul. Wear a cup though...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Waaazooo
Posted

My leveling kit just came in the mail today and I have some concerns with the Rough Country 2" Leveling Kit spacers being made out of a plastic type material. Has anyone had any issues?

I highly doubt they'll break (have yet to hear about one) and they won't corrode.

Posted

I put a Pro Comp 2.25" leveling kit and Zone 1.5" body lift on mine. Cost less than half the price of a 4" suspension lift and rides like factory still.

 

Looks sharp...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,134 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...