Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was in the same dilemma not too long ago. I personally preferred aesthetic appearances over functionality (enjoying my youth at the expense of my wallet). The 275/65 looks nice from the side but I felt like the front/back view was more important because it's rare that somebody only sees the side directly without being at an angle of some sort. I wanted my truck to have a variety of good angles, as opposed to just two good sides.

 

Then when looking around at 305/55 tires, I came across the Nitto XL tires. They were only ~50 lbs of unsprung weight as opposed to the 58-62 lbs of most LT 305/55 tires. I don't regularly run trails or anything so I didn't feel the excess protection was necessary. Even the 275/65 BFG KO2 weighs ~57 I think. I lost some aerodynamics, and fuel economy, but not as much as if I'd have gone with an LT tire.

 

The sidewall of the KO2's are sexy, but the weight was a slight turn off. The mileage warranty was a plus for me in choosing the Nitto G2s. Just sharing my reasons for my decisions.

  • Like 1
Posted

Installed a 2.5in leveling kit and took it to the dealership to have them inspect my front suspension, torque all bolts to spec and get a front end alignment. 1 1/2 weeks later a bolt snapped on the upper control arm causing the tire to cave in. Needles to say in a huge argument with the dealership now because I believe they over torqued the bolt causing it to weaken and snap. Any experiences like this?

Posted (edited)

 

I'm just curious why you stayed with 275/65's instead of going with something wider? Maybe a 305/55R20? The diameter is only slightly different (33" with the 275/65's vs. 33.2" with the 305/55's.)

 

I suppose there is more patch contact area from a 305 vs a 275, so you will get a little more drag (ie. less fuel mileage) but I personally just think that the wider tires look so much better on a lifted/leveled truck.

 

From everything I've read it seems like the 305/55R20 will fit on a truck with at least a 2" level. There is a possibility for a very minor rub at full lock, but if it does it would be minor. Some people have stated they had a 2" level with zero rub on the 305's.

 

I just picked-up a 2017 GMC Sierra and put a 2.5" Motofab level kit on it, and am planning on putting 305/55R20 K02's on it in the next week or two. I was just curious if there was a fit issue that prevented you from going wider, or if it was just cost and fuel mileage.

 

Your truck looks great though! I've always like BFG's for all around tires. Not too noisey on the highway and great off-road in the woods.

Keep in mind tires vary in sizes by brand and AT vs MT. Generally a 305 55 in all terrain type will me smaller but its best to look for tire specs on their respective site. My 33x12.5 Federal mt measure 32.8x12.3" and would rub on the UCA on reverse and full lock turns. 1/4" wheels spacers fixed that

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by asalinasz39
Posted (edited)

Anybody run a 20x10 -24 on a 295/55r20?

 

I've seen a few 33x12.50 on -24 with claimed little rub on this thread, but no 295/55. Looking at the ridge grappler which specs 32.7x12.17, on a rough country 2.5 level. I have the cast steel arms, they are not stamped. This would be on a 2016 sierra not that it matters particularly

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by MOhunter92
Posted

Can anyone tell me the rim size on my 2016 Sierra with 265 65r18 stock rim? 18×8 or 18×9 ? Sorry I searched and nada

Posted

Can anyone tell me the rim size on my 2016 Sierra with 265 65r18 stock rim? 18×8 or 18×9 ? Sorry I searched and nada

18x8.5 +24 offset

Posted

Just picked up my truck from the shop:

 

 

2014 Sierra 1500 - 2WD

2.5 inch front level

2 inch rear block

275/65/20 - Toyo Open Country A/T II

 

No rubbing at all. post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

post-159584-0-03338700-1485979136_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I put a Pro Comp 2.25" leveling kit and Zone 1.5" body lift on mine. Cost less than half the price of a 4" suspension lift and rides like factory still.

 

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-53805600-1485992556_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-76115300-1485992560_thumb.jpg

post-168372-0-67283000-1485992563_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

My leveling kit just came in the mail today and I have some concerns with the Rough Country 2" Leveling Kit spacers being made out of a plastic type material. Has anyone had any issues?

Edited by Isidro____
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

My leveling kit just came in the mail today and I have some concerns with the Rough Country 2" Leveling Kit spacers being made out of a plastic type material. Has anyone had any issues?

Those polymer spacers are pretty tough. Go into the garage and hit it with your 5lb maul. Wear a cup though...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Waaazooo
Posted

My leveling kit just came in the mail today and I have some concerns with the Rough Country 2" Leveling Kit spacers being made out of a plastic type material. Has anyone had any issues?

I highly doubt they'll break (have yet to hear about one) and they won't corrode.

Posted

I put a Pro Comp 2.25" leveling kit and Zone 1.5" body lift on mine. Cost less than half the price of a 4" suspension lift and rides like factory still.

 

Looks sharp...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 522 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...