Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sharp looking rig! What are you running up front? And may just be the angle, but anything in the rear?

Sorry meant to quote you.

 

2" level in the front +1" block in the rear. 275/65-20 (34") tires.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Rough Country 2.5" and 35x11.50 Nitto Ridge Grapplers

 

Yup! Made my new setup pretty easy to decide on.

Posted

My thoughts as well.

Considering these are bigger than a 285/65/20, and everyone says those rub, I just don't see how it's feasible without some rub.

  • Like 1
Posted

Considering these are bigger than a 285/65/20, and everyone says those rub, I just don't see how it's feasible without some rub.

Well the air dam is removed so that helps, but it looks like he has positive offset, so that hurts. I would say that it does rub somewhere. Probably on the rear inside of the front wheel liner.

Posted

Just got my leveling kit in last night!! Cant wait till I install them over the weekend!!

I decided to go with the 2.5" kit

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

OK, I'll bite. Where do they rub?

 

it rubs the sway bar at full lock. I cut the inner fender liner so there is no rub there

Edited by THE_Engineer
  • Like 1
Posted

anybody got picture with a 2in front and rear with stock tire size... im buying the rc 2.5 kit but i think it would look weird with stock tire at 2.5 so im thinking going with the 2in f/r like my old truck was

Posted

anybody got picture with a 2in front and rear with stock tire size... im buying the rc 2.5 kit but i think it would look weird with stock tire at 2.5 so im thinking going with the 2in f/r like my old truck was

This is a 2" front w/ factory tires. I don't think another .5" would look that bad. when time for tires just go up to a 33

post-155210-0-07865000-1503599562_thumb.jpg

post-155210-0-07865000-1503599562_thumb.jpg

post-155210-0-07865000-1503599562_thumb.jpg

post-155210-0-07865000-1503599562_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

you got the 2in at the back too??... i wont put tire on for a while since i got ko2 with the truck

 

No, just the fronts. Thought it would give you some idea of what it would look l like. My wranglers have 23K and about 10K left. cant wait to upgrade tires.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)
    • Did you tune out the VVT?  07-09 they did not have VVT.  2010-2013 they did.      If you haven't tuned it, its trying to adjust cam timing.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...