Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My truck hasn't seen the liquid brine, I haven't driven it in the last 3 winters. I don't know how much worse that is, salt is salt. Mortal enemy of unprotected steel and we use a lot of it here. The problem with the coatings everyone is recommending is they only get one side. You can't get at any of the hydro formed box sections so they continue to rust from the inside out. The only real way to protect these frames properly is hot dip galvanize them. Though that adds weight. The rust protection sprays if done right can get into the hydro formed cavities but too late for that now it seems. Ford is going to aluminium bodies, maybe they will do the frame next. They will have to be careful with that making sure the 2 metals are electrically separated.

The basic problem is GM is trying to lighten the truck and sacrificing longevity because their corrosion protection for the frame doesn't work. I would sacrifice a few points in gas mileage for an extra decade of driving my truck.
.

  • Like 2
Posted

The old salt and sand mix was not anywhere near as bad as the magnesium chloride being used in some states. Not only rusting out cars and tractor trailers but bridges too.

Posted

Interesting, actually a study at Purdue shows it is about half as damaging as salt, sodium chloride to bridges. I live on a dirt road and it is used as a dust suppressant and stabilizer. So I get it year round. Every time the road gets wet it splashes on my truck and car. So much for thinking I washed everything off in the spring.

The one thing bad for vehicles is it attracts moisture. It will make things stay wet longer meaning the chemical attack will continue for a longer period of time. So even though it may be half as damaging as regular salt, by staying active longer it could be way worse over a year. Plus by using it in the winter for ice control and in the summer for dust control I get it 12 months of the year. I live in a humid area so it has lots of moisture to work year round, it just sucks it out of the air.

I had noticed some times even though it was dry out that the dust collecting in areas under my vehicles would be damp. This explains that. You learn something every day. Doesn't let GM off the hook though. If their corrosion protection stayed in place it should prevent this. It seems if you lose a section of the coating, corrosion will run under the rest of it and peel it all off. As you can see on my truck it is all gone. So for everyone else, keep an eye on it and when a section of frame becomes exposed go into the dealer and make them repair it. GM has a bulletin out and will pay for it.

  • Like 1
Posted

A coworker of mine has a 2012 with the undercoating peeling off. I told him about the dealers fixing the 2014's. He stopped by his dealer last week, and they fixed his too.

Posted

From what I've heard is keeping your vehicle in a garage. Especially if it is heated can speed up the corrosion process.

  • Like 1
Posted

From what I've heard is keeping your vehicle in a garage. Especially if it is heated can speed up the corrosion process.

X2 on that. It allows the salty snow to melt overnight and the salt sits everywhere it shouldn't.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

The body on my 03 Silverado is still pretty much rust free. My concern is the frame area towards the rear. I already replaced brake lines and leaf spring shackles due to rust. Other then using the Por 15 stuff is there anything else i can spray on there to slow the rust down? I was thinking of just scrapping the rusted areas and undercoating. Any ideas and suggestions greatly appreciated !



I'm considering using this stuff. Has anyone else tried it :


http://www.eastwood.com/rust-encapsulator-28601.html?reltype=2&parent_id=48159



Lou


Edited by SG Lou
Posted

IMO....Im not sure painting over rust is a good idea either. Once rust starts the only way to stop it is to wire brush it down to bare metal, and cover it with a NON- drying product like fluid film or similar. I personally use "Rust Check coat and protect" that come in a green spray can from Canadian tire. Dealers are putting a rubber based rust protector on from the factory that drys, and this is the worst stuff you can put on your frame. Once is cracks ( and it will happen) it traps moisture in and rust will form and spread like wild-fire because is never gets a chance to dry out. I seen it first hand on my old 2002 s-10 which i purchaced second hand with 80,000kms on it, and underneath the rubber undercoating was scales of rust the length of the frame.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've seen POR15 used with the pretreatment work well in these situations but if it's too thin and weak no paint is going to help

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm the original poster of the rusted out silverado frame.

 

Since then I've gotten a frame restoration garage to do a restore. They did about $1700 worth of work. Took the box off rebuilt parts of the frame, replaced things like shock and spring mounts, motor mounts too. The brackets that held the running boards on had to be replaced. While there they replaced the gas line. After they were finished they sprayed all (most) exposed areas with this black stuff. 94421 or called something like that.

 

I purchased a rear bumper from Amazon and put it on myself. Any rust on that was from other reasons. A crease in the chrome from a dent started the backside metal rusting out. It almost cut the bumper in half. BTW.. I've got lots of the same thing on my older tahoe.... rust but no falling apart issues. If anyone is replacing a bumper do yourself a favor and cut chunks of it off with a grinder to get to the bolts. Otherwise, taking it off is 90% of the job. A new one goes on easy.

 

Now...... I got a low coolant notice. No leaks that I can find. I'm keeping track of it to see if it's more than a one time thing. if not then game's over for me with this vehicle and GM if it's a head gasket or cracked block. Will this vehicle hell never end!?

post-133090-0-50052200-1410342012_thumb.jpgpost-133090-0-19901800-1410342025_thumb.jpg

post-133090-0-50052200-1410342012_thumb.jpg

post-133090-0-19901800-1410342025_thumb.jpg

post-133090-0-50052200-1410342012_thumb.jpg

post-133090-0-19901800-1410342025_thumb.jpg

post-133090-0-50052200-1410342012_thumb.jpg

post-133090-0-19901800-1410342025_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

It's almost 12 years old, and lived in a crappy climate all of it's life. GMT800's are known BIG rusters in my area (upstate NY). Unfortunately, these things don't last forever.

Posted

Here is some information that will help when firming up a rusted frame. My frame doesn't have enough metal left to grind down to bare. I was thinking of using this process before I put a protectant over coat on.

9-5TannicAcidTreatm.pdf9-6CleaningIron.pdf

 

9-5TannicAcidTreatm.pdf

9-6CleaningIron.pdf

9-5TannicAcidTreatm.pdf

9-6CleaningIron.pdf

9-5TannicAcidTreatm.pdf

9-6CleaningIron.pdf

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

It's a big problem that I just started seeing. Yep pulled the bed off my 2002 and May as well junk the truck. Frame is rusted so badly. So figured I might just look for another wrecked truck Lol. Big surprise there are 30 or so silverado trucks for sale local. Ok off to find one. Not one of them has a good frame under it!!!!!!!! Not all were plow trucks. Some not even high milage. Wow not so happy now. What have others done with bad back halfs? I have no problem at all cutting this truck in half if I could find a clean back half Disclaimer. I have cut many trucks( big and little) not for Joe average. You can't tell me that GM thinks this is not a problem!! Brake lines. Fuel lines. Rockers. Cab corners I can and do deal with. But what the!! Have a 54. 66. 82. 87 90. Non have frame rot like this

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...