Jump to content

best engines ever put in a gm truck


steveo2155

Recommended Posts

Posted

Late 70's and early 80's V8's made so little horsepower...dark days.

Still a 305 V8 was a lot better than straight sixes in cars of the same era. I remember one of our friends had a 1978 Ford Fairmont with a straight 6 (250 cu in ?) and the car would barely maintain 55 MPH up hills on I 79 in West Virginia with the gas pedal on the floor. My 1977 Camaro with the 305 V8 would easily do 80+ MPH on the same road.
  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I am a huge fan of the L76 6.0L Vortec Max engine, without the AFM being active of course! Strongest engine I've ever had in a vehicle.

Fuel economy isn't the best but that's not why we buy trucks and SUV's with V8 engines.

 

With all of the cuirrent production engines GM offers, it's difficult to get the best performance out of your engine because GM slapped AFM into all of them. The only way to get the true performance in the current engines is with the AFM deactivated and a custom tune. They would all be very impressive if it weren't for the AFM system and all of the power limiting nannies GM has programmed into them from the factory. Take away the torque management, throttle response delay, and the AFM and they would all put out some impressive numbers.

Posted

For me I would personally say the 1999+ 5.3L non AFM and the L92. The 5.3L is basically the modern day work horse, ultra reliable Vortec 350. Then the L92 was just a stud from day and always put out great numbers. I'd also say the L86 but with the DI engines it's too early to say how these hold up down the road.

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Any of them for different reasons, except for the early attempts at the diesel. Great memory's of them all....mostly.

Posted

The 350 and the 4.8 first truck had a 350 and my current has the 4.8. both solid engines and easy to work on.

Posted

350 - good old days. and YES you could work on them . Today you end up at the dealership .

Posted

I've seen 350's run with a hole in the block and a piston missing ha ha...

 

Probably the only engine that can sit for years and with a little tinkering they start.

Posted

Gasser...Hands down 6.0L Vortec thing is indestructible.

Diesel...LML 6.6 Duramax Best of new/old tech & reliability.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,668 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...