Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey guys,

 

I posted in the giant thread about my fix but I'm sure it's already gotten lost. I think this is important to at least have floating somewhere for someone to search.

 

Symptoms: At 60-70mph I was experiencing a severe shake/vibration. I could usually push out of it at 70+ but it was still noticeable. It was like clock work as soon as I hit up around 60mph.

 

Solution: I got my truck fully inspected before purchase and they noted the vibration. Mechanic showed me a dent in the drive shaft and general wear on the shaft. His recommendation was to replace it. I ordered the part online. The new shaft came fully assembled with new Ujoints and the yoke to slide in. Installation was very easy. I have driven 100 miles since installation and I have ZERO vibration. I hit 60mph and it is very smooth. So the culprit could be the shaft the ujoint or the yoke. Once again this fix worked for me and it may not be the same issue on your truck but I had pretty bad vibrations and they are GONE.

 

Good luck!!

 

*NOTE* I have no warranty so that is why I attempted a fix on my own. I'm sure this problem will still crop up as peoples warranty starts to expire.

Edited by Bowtie619
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Have you taken the truck to 72 mph or higher? If so did it vibrate then? Most people with the vibration problem (including myself) do not have vibes below 70 mph.

Posted

Have you taken the truck to 72 mph or higher? If so did it vibrate then? Most people with the vibration problem (including myself) do not have vibes below 70 mph.

 

I have taken it up to 85 with no issues. Cruise at about 80mph to multiple destination with no issues. It's a night and day comparison. At this point the vibration is not partially but completely gone. I've only gone about 100 miles so there is still a chance it could come back but I'm willing to bet there was an issue with the original Ujoints or yoke. Also, when I pulled the yoke out it looked pretty dry. The new shaft had a ton of lubricant in it. Not sure if that could have been an issue as well.

Posted

 

 

I have taken it up to 85 with no issues. Cruise at about 80mph to multiple destination with no issues. It's a night and day comparison. At this point the vibration is not partially but completely gone. I've only gone about 100 miles so there is still a chance it could come back but I'm willing to bet there was an issue with the original Ujoints or yoke. Also, when I pulled the yoke out it looked pretty dry. The new shaft had a ton of lubricant in it. Not sure if that could have been an issue as well.

 

What ratio is the rear end in your truck? 3.42?

Posted

There has been quite a few people who have had their driveshaft replaced and it did nothing to cure the vibes. I think you just had a bent drive shaft that caused vibes and the new one fixed it. You said you were having severe vibes between 60 and 70 mph, almost all the complaints on vibes are either above 70 mph or below 45 mph.

  • Like 1
Posted

There has been quite a few people who have had their driveshaft replaced and it did nothing to cure the vibes. I think you just had a bent drive shaft that caused vibes and the new one fixed it. You said you were having severe vibes between 60 and 70 mph, almost all the complaints on vibes are either above 70 mph or below 45 mph.

I agree, but did they replace only the shaft? Or were the Ubolts and yoke also replaced? Just something to consider. The dent was so small I don't feel like it could have affected the overall spin of the shaft but I could be wrong. Like I said, there is no definite solution for everyone but this 100% fixed my problem. The part was about 350$, with I think a 30% restocking fee on returns. Might be worth the risk to some people who don't have any other options at this point.

What ratio is the rear end in your truck? 3.42?

I'm not sure, is there somewhere I can check this?

Posted

would you say that your vibration was slight at 60 peaked at 65 and reduced to 70 and then basically went away after 70?

I wouldn't say it went away at 70+, it felt more like it was pulsating slowly. The rest would be a good description though.

Posted

This confirms something for me, my suspicion has been that these truck resonate at 39 Hz which means even slight disturbances can cause vibration issues. Which for tire speed peaks at about 75 mph. or 3 times the rotational speed of the tire. Because the rear end ratio is 3.42 in your truck the drive line angular velocity is approximately 39Hz at 65 mph. Confirms the problem is resonance and the body mounts like to transmit vibrations in the 39 hz region. Like you said the dent looked so minor you wouldn't think it would cause issues but if you have a resonance situation even something minor makes it way through. Thanks for the info

  • Like 5
Posted

I'm no engineer but that doesn't sound like there's an easy fix for that?

Redesign of the body mounts, which would require more crash testing and expensive qualifications. Makes me wonder if the reason some trucks vibrate and most don't is the batch of rubber the mounts are made from. I've considered purchasing a new set but you'd be in it a 1000 dollars to do the 6 cab mounts. They're a hydraulic shear mount which was patented in 2011 by vibracoustics north america which is owned by Trelleborg, and according to their website they make just about every body mount for every manufacture so I can't see why the would only have issues with this particular truck but who knows. I'm working on a mount to cancel out that frequency that will replace the pucks used for my 1.5" body lift, but the spring rate of rubber is tricky and it's dependent upon the weight of the cab so I'm just throwing a wild ass guess at what that number is plus you have to account for a varying mass from 200 - 1000 lbs depending on passengers. Going to be some trial and error I'm sure.

  • Like 3
Posted

Redesign of the body mounts, which would require more crash testing and expensive qualifications. Makes me wonder if the reason some trucks vibrate and most don't is the batch of rubber the mounts are made from. I've considered purchasing a new set but you'd be in it a 1000 dollars to do the 6 cab mounts. They're a hydraulic shear mount which was patented in 2011 by vibracoustics north america which is owned by Trelleborg, and according to their website they make just about every body mount for every manufacture so I can't see why the would only have issues with this particular truck but who knows. I'm working on a mount to cancel out that frequency that will replace the pucks used for my 1.5" body lift, but the spring rate of rubber is tricky and it's dependent upon the weight of the cab so I'm just throwing a wild ass guess at what that number is plus you have to account for a varying mass from 200 - 1000 lbs depending on passengers. Going to be some trial and error I'm sure.

I totally agree with all of this.

 

I wonder how the previous GMT-900 body mounts compare dimensionally. Will they fit?

Posted

I totally agree with all of this.

 

I wonder how the previous GMT-900 body mounts compare dimensionally. Will they fit?

That's a negative not without some serious adaptation. This is an avenue I'm currently looking into though. at least for the two rear cab mounts. When GM had a problem with frame beaming on the HD they released a redesigned cab mount to fix the issue. Because I have the body lift I can fit the GMT900 cab mount which by the way is the same mount still used on the current production HD platform which doesn't vibrate. The major difference is the new shear mounts bolt to the frame with 2 ears that attach to outer isolator, the interior isolator that carries the mount bolt just passes through a hole in the perch and doesn't actually sandwich either side of the perch see the patent link below. My thought without measuring the through hole on the perch is that it is too big and the lower mounting isolator from the GMT 900 will having nothing to seat against see the other link below. But I think there is enough room to fab an adapter plate that can use the 2 existing holes for the shear mount to bolt into place and carry the GMT900 mount. I thought about giving this a try before replacing all the lift pucks with something else. Below are the two links one that shows how the GMT900 mount works and the other is the patent for shear style mount which is what is currently underneath the K2XX 1500's. If you look up part # 25994881 on a gm parts website it shows it as being the current mount used on 2015 2500 and 3500 pickups and being the replacement mount on the GMT900 trucks as well.

 

http://www.gmtruckcentral.com/articles/bodymounts.html

http://www.google.com/patents/US7389977

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
    • Looks nice. I still have my 2000, 1500. Bought a 2025, 1500 for retirement. Feels solid. These trucks have a bad rap on the internet. My brother has a `24 1500, 5.3 with 52,000 miles. No problems at all. Mine hasn`t either but mine`s only at 12,700 miles. Have seen some of these things with 100,000 miles with no problems.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...