Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I presently have 2.5" level and trying to decide between BFG KO2s 275/65r20's or 285/65r20's .

 

The latter is significantly more expensive. I've searched quite a bit on here and only found a hand full of guy running 285/65r20s on a 2.5" level. Of the pix I have found, one looks like that setup is "stuffing them in the wheel wells", while the guy running the exact same setup looked perfectly fine.

 

If you have that setup please post up pix! Or if you have the 275/65r20s and wish you had gone bigger, please chime in also!

Posted
I presently have 2.5" level and trying to decide between BFG KO2s 275/65r20's or 285/65r20's .
 
The latter is significantly more expensive. I've searched quite a bit on here and only found a hand full of guy running 285/65r20s on a 2.5" level. Of the pix I have found, one looks like that setup is "stuffing them in the wheel wells", while the guy running the exact same setup looked perfectly fine.
 
If you have that setup please post up pix! Or if you have the 275/65r20s and wish you had gone bigger, please chime in also!



Higher than 2.5, but would clear just fine. 737fc2c69392fc664f92f76eaebf5046.jpgcf7d28f9957e30e3908df7c3e984d4b8.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted



Higher than 2.5, but would clear just fine. 737fc2c69392fc664f92f76eaebf5046.jpgcf7d28f9957e30e3908df7c3e984d4b8.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

0e87da3897937e9812a744450924d1c6.jpg

275/60/r20 and a 2.5" lift

Another

d98c0873d56e2794ec766d5cfe70f55a.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Currently running BFG KO2's 285/65 R20's on a 2.5 inch level and a 2 inch rear level.gallery_163014_4656_841832.jpggallery_163014_4656_1120329.jpggallery_163014_4656_1631018.jpggallery_163014_4656_5360358.jpg

Posted

So which kit are you using? the RC 2.5" that comes with the rear block? And you get no rubbing at all ??

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hello All!

Thanks to this web site and the kind people who have given the information I have gotten here, I was able to pull the plug and go with my leveling kit and 285/65/R20's.

Here are the specifics - Work was performed by RMT Off Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. I highly recommend them for ANY work you need done. I used them because they were an authorized installer to save my new truck warranty as this truck only has 6,000 miles on it.

  • Traxda 3"+1" leveling kit - (before tires, I gained 2-3/4" height at the front)
  • OEM 20" x 9" wheels - No Spacers
  • 285/65/R20 BFG KO2's

Measurements after Level & KO2's

At front license plate - ground to the top of the bumper at body line - 25-3/16" Originally...............Leveled - 29-7/16"

At receiver hitch - 18-13/16" Originally...............Leveled 20-5/16" 

At front fender - 36-1/4" Originally..................Leveled 40-1/8"

At back fender - 38-1/2" Originally..................Leveled 41-3/4"

I get very minor rubbing at full lock, only on the driver side. It rubs about a quarter size spot at the rear of the well lining, toward the frame. I will tie this back with a zip tie this spring when the weather is warmer. It is so slight that I can wait until then to do this.

 

Thanks again to everyone on this site for their input and help.

Leveled 1.JPG

Leveled 3.JPG

Leveled 4.JPG

  • Like 4
Posted

 

I ended up with the 275/65-R20 KO2s - got a deal from 4wheel parts I could not pass up.

 

With the 2.5" front leveling kit the fenders measure 39.5" front and 40.5" in rear w/stock block.

 

Before and after:

5a4c0ecb324ef_beforeandaftertires.thumb.png.e70458fa052a8a8e9be608182513d17b.pngf0ec1197-cd90-4e4f-b640-2683539bb3b2.thumb.jpg.6b3159a66bc814aded604cfe0b2235a5.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
15 hours ago, amxguy1970 said:

Are the measurements backwards? It looks nose high.

 

Tyler

If you are talking to me the measurements are correct. Pics may be a bit deceiving but it has about 1" of rake.

Posted (edited)

Today I took off the GMC emblem from the tail gate, added some bling to the tail gate handle, and changed the front grille emblem letters to the white carbon fiber!

Looking better every day!

Grille Emblem 1.JPG

Grille Emblems.JPG

Tailgate Chrome.JPG

Edited by got9seconds
Posted (edited)
On 10/12/2017 at 7:46 PM, 14 Silvy said:

Not my truck but here is what I found 2.5 level and 285/65/206ddd84fbeb18e57e6d713249b8fa7664.jpg

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

I know I'm late on this thread but here are my results from a 2" rough country leveling kit and tires BFG KO2 size 275-55/R20

side cT.jpg

Edited by jogutier
included more info on the wheels
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...