Jump to content

Engine Pings on 87 Octane... Everyone or just me?

papageoff

By papageoff
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

Recommended Posts

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted

So, I've had this truck about 15 months.  I bought it used from Carmax  and ran 87 octane for the first year or so.  I noticed that I got a good bit of engine pinging.  It's would get worse under load or in hot weather.  And during that year I always felt like the truck was a bit of a dog.  

 

In January, I'd had enough and bumped up to 91 octane for a couple months.  It got much better but didn't quite go away.  About 3 or 4 tanks ago, I switched to 93 octane (premium, in my area) and I don't think I've heard it ping once.  The mileage hasn't changed (unsurprisingly), but the truck just feels "peppy."  The throttle response is massively improved and it's a much better driving vehicle.  I think the best way I can describe it is that it's no longer lazy.  I mean, it's not a sports car, but it no longer needs a few seconds to get it to accelerate.  I know the instant response to that is "it's all in your head" but my wife who has no idea (read: doesn't care) what's been going on commented the other day that I haven't complained about the truck's performance lately.  I'm not excited about having to feed this beast premium, but if I don't I'm afraid it's going to tear itself up.

 

Also, I haven't changed gas stations through this time and the ones I use are busy, top-tier locations so I'm not thinking the quality of the gas is involved.  

 

I'm thinking the truck was tuned by the previous owner.  I'm going to ask about that at my next service visit, but I don't expect they'll tell me anything.  Is there a way I can verify if the truck is on the stock tune?  Also, has anyone else had a similar experience? 

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
calgator73 Senior Enthusiast

calgator73

Posted
Posted
So, I've had this truck about 15 months.  I bought it used from Carmax  and ran 87 octane for the first year or so.  I noticed that I got a good bit of engine pinging.  It's would get worse under load or in hot weather.  And during that year I always felt like the truck was a bit of a dog.  
 
In January, I'd had enough and bumped up to 91 octane for a couple months.  It got much better but didn't quite go away.  About 3 or 4 tanks ago, I switched to 93 octane (premium, in my area) and I don't think I've heard it ping once.  The mileage hasn't changed (unsurprisingly), but the truck just feels "peppy."  The throttle response is massively improved and it's a much better driving vehicle.  I think the best way I can describe it is that it's no longer lazy.  I mean, it's not a sports car, but it no longer needs a few seconds to get it to accelerate.  I know the instant response to that is "it's all in your head" but my wife who has no idea (read: doesn't care) what's been going on commented the other day that I haven't complained about the truck's performance lately.  I'm not excited about having to feed this beast premium, but if I don't I'm afraid it's going to tear itself up.
 
Also, I haven't changed gas stations through this time and the ones I use are busy, top-tier locations so I'm not thinking the quality of the gas is involved.  
 
I'm thinking the truck was tuned by the previous owner.  I'm going to ask about that at my next service visit, but I don't expect they'll tell me anything.  Is there a way I can verify if the truck is on the stock tune?  Also, has anyone else had a similar experience? 
There is a way but if the dealer finds out and you have any kind of warranty left it will likely be voided.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

calgator73 Senior Enthusiast

calgator73

Posted
Posted

It might actually be better for you to put some Techron in the tank and be sure you use top tier 87 octane fuel for a few tanks and see if your problem goes away. Some of your symptoms sound like bad gas. There is a video from Lingenfelter I believe showing how the 5.3 L reacts to 87 and 89 and I believe 91 octane fuel. the engine really does like 89 octane fuel. If you have access to "E85" and your truck is compatible, look for the yellow fuel cap, then you will see a massive Improvement in throttle response and horsepower.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It might actually be better for you to put some Techron in the tank and be sure you use top tier 87 octane fuel for a few tanks and see if your problem goes away. Some of your symptoms sound like bad gas. There is a video from Lingenfelter I believe showing how the 5.3 L reacts to 87 and 89 and I believe 91 octane fuel. the engine really does like 89 octane fuel. If you have access to "E85" and your truck is compatible, look for the yellow fuel cap, then you will see a massive Improvement in throttle response and horsepower.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk


I'll try that for a few. I go through a tank every week or 10 days so premium is burdensome.

I don't have the ffv badge so I don't think it can run e85. I'll look into it more deeply though.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
  • Author
Posted
52 minutes ago, calgator73 said:
There is a way but if the dealer finds out and you have any kind of warranty left it will likely be voided.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

Yeah, I wondered about that. The other side of it is if the premium is masking another issue that would otherwise be fixable, it'd be nice to run the less expensive fuel.

That said it runs so much better on premium, I have to believe that it has been tuned for 91 and the engine was just doing what it could pulling timing, etc. to make 87 work.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 

pmhinatl Enthusiast

pmhinatl

Posted
Posted
Yeah, I wondered about that. The other side of it is if the premium is making another issue that would otherwise be fixable, it'd be nice to run the less expensive fuel.

That said it runs so much better on premium, I have to believe that it has been tuned for 91 and the engine was just doing what it could pulling timing, etc. to make 87 work.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk




My ‘15 Sierra 5.3 CCSB (I’m the 3rd owner) pings and feels tired on 87 regular, but I definitely believe it improves with mid-grade. I don’t feel much of a difference with premium tho. I’ve wondered the same thing about a tune, but would be surprised if there was one installed. The previous owner didn’t seem the type nor did he mention anything to me. It’s a mystery. So maybe the next question should be: is there an easy way to check the bcm for a tune -without - going to the dealer?

M.

calgator73 Senior Enthusiast

calgator73

Posted
Posted

If it's a well done tune...no. everything will look the same except the flash counter. GM has a process to compare the actual program installed to factory spec.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

calgator73 Senior Enthusiast

calgator73

Posted
Posted
I'll try that for a few. I go through a tank every week or 10 days so premium is burdensome.

I don't have the ffv badge so I don't think it can run e85. I'll look into it more deeply though.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

You'll have a yellow fuel cap and an alcohol sensor installed on your fuel line forward of the fuel tank. No flex fuel badging

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, calgator73 said:

You'll have a yellow fuel cap and an alcohol sensor installed on your fuel line forward of the fuel tank. No flex fuel badging

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

My fuel cap is black.  I figured it wasn't compatible with e85. 

Geoff 

dbrobins27 Enthusiast

dbrobins27

Posted
Posted

I have noticed the same thing.  A good bit of pinging on 87 and when I run 89 it clears it up and is much more responsive.  I have tried 93 and didn't feel as much difference as 87 vs 89.  I have about 67k on a 2014 5.3

Loco-diablo Senior Enthusiast

Loco-diablo

Posted
Posted

Good timing for this post. I bought my 2017 5.3 new 10 months ago and have used midgrade 89 since day one. Today for the first time, I actually filled with 87.

40 miles in to the tank full and I'm not noticing any difference. With gas going up ($2.59 shell 87. $2.89 shell 89), I thought I try reg unleaded.  

wforrest08 Senior Enthusiast

wforrest08

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, papageoff said:

 Is there a way I can verify if the truck is on the stock tune?  Also, has anyone else had a similar experience? 

First thing I would check if you haven’t already does the truck cycle in and out of V4? I would think most (not all) guys going with a 91 octane would also tune out AFM. Factory wheel/tire size or oversized? If oversized use a mobile GPS and see if the speed matches the speedo (within 1-2mph) if it does odds are somebody has at least done a recalibration and possibly a tune. There’s tire revolution charts on line for comparisons.

 

 

If you want to run 87 octane Blackbear (probably others as well) will do a 87 tune. My 15 was tuned by them they sent me a 87 and a 91 tune. Can’t comment on the 87 tune as I’ve only ever ran the 91 tune. You would have to do the math to see if it would be worth your investment cost per tank difference and how long your planning on keeping the truck. If you sell/trade the truck down the road you program the truck back to stock and it “unlocks” the tuner so you can use it on your next one or sell it to recoup some of your investment. If your investment is $600 and your saving $7.50 per fill it’s 80 tanks to recoup if you fill up 26 times a year recovery time is 3 years. 

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 hours ago, wforrest08 said:

First thing I would check if you haven’t already does the truck cycle in and out of V4? I would think most (not all) guys going with a 91 octane would also tune out AFM. Factory wheel/tire size or oversized? If oversized use a mobile GPS and see if the speed matches the speedo (within 1-2mph) if it does odds are somebody has at least done a recalibration and possibly a tune. There’s tire revolution charts on line for comparisons.

 

 

If you want to run 87 octane Blackbear (probably others as well) will do a 87 tune. My 15 was tuned by them they sent me a 87 and a 91 tune. Can’t comment on the 87 tune as I’ve only ever ran the 91 tune. You would have to do the math to see if it would be worth your investment cost per tank difference and how long your planning on keeping the truck. If you sell/trade the truck down the road you program the truck back to stock and it “unlocks” the tuner so you can use it on your next one or sell it to recoup some of your investment. If your investment is $600 and your saving $7.50 per fill it’s 80 tanks to recoup if you fill up 26 times a year recovery time is 3 years. 

So, you got me to thinking...

 

  • It does use v4 mode (Aside: but not nearly as often as I'd have thought.  I'd be really interested from an engineering standpoint to understand the algorithm they use to decide when to trigger it, honestly.)
  • It's on the factory wheels/tires.  It's possible that the previous owner removed/replaced them, but given how worn the tires are, I'd doubt it.
  • The speedo is consistently within 1mph of the GPS as measured by Torque Pro and my OBDII connector.  

So, yeah... All that adds up to no tune, most likely.  Unfortunately, that leads me back to the question of why it pings so much on 87 octane if that's what it's supposed to run per the manual.  I asked my neighbor about his '17 and he said he's always run 93 and never noticed pinging.  He did the same in his '15, too.  I guess he just doesn't like money, I dunno.  

hirdlej Enthusiast

hirdlej

Posted
Posted

I don't know how much more premium is in your area vs 87 but in MN it's only 20 cents more a gallon.  20 cents times 20 gallons (at fillup) equates to 4 dollars.  I would just spend the $4 at each fillup and be done.  I run 91 non-oxy in all my stuff since I don't like ethanol touching the fuel components of my vehicles.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • garagerog
      Low fuel pressure after installing new fuel pump

      By garagerog · Posted

      Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Gilkey96
      Low fuel pressure after installing new fuel pump

      By Gilkey96 · Posted

      Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • diyer2
      AFM Experience

      By diyer2 · Posted

      I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • MORSNO
      Which 2027 engine will you choose?

      By MORSNO · Posted

      Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...