Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

bd0388f47e1a6da227990c3e2678564a.jpg

New tires [emoji3]. Better pics to come


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Posted
Ordered new tires today getting them tomorrow stayed with the stock size BFG KO2s

Tires of the poor traction with the stock Goodyear’s. With winter coming I don’t want to screw around


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I can’t for the life of me figure why they keep putting absolute junk tires on new vehicles. My 2016 Silverado had crappy tires, my 20 was the same (had the 1 yr old tires from the 16 brought over to the 20), last two cars I bought for my wife from Chevy were the same (Malibu and Equinox). I know they’re quiet and cheap but,come on!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posted
17 hours ago, Imcrazy said:


I can’t for the life of me figure why they keep putting absolute junk tires on new vehicles. My 2016 Silverado had crappy tires, my 20 was the same (had the 1 yr old tires from the 16 brought over to the 20), last two cars I bought for my wife from Chevy were the same (Malibu and Equinox). I know they’re quiet and cheap but,come on!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

My 2020 has Michelin Primacy LTX in a 265/65R18. So far they have performed great. My '16 Colorado I had before this truck came stock with Goodyear tires that were horrible. I switch to Michelin LTX tires on it and loved them. I ran 2 sets of them on my Colorado before getting the RST. When these OEM Michelin tires need replacing I will probably go with the LTX or if I can find a set of black 18" or 20" take off wheels whatever tires are on them.

Posted
20 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

bd0388f47e1a6da227990c3e2678564a.jpg

New tires emoji3.png. Better pics to come


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Nice! I had been wondering if you would ditch the Trailrunner ATs at some point. With that nice truck and the 2" lift, those tires never did you justice. 

Posted

Tried out the new Airlift airbags. It leveled out the truck perfectly and tows a lot better. 

F47E1CC3-4EE4-4690-99EB-299C920BD4F4.jpeg

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Htown T1 said:

Tried out the new Airlift airbags. It leveled out the truck perfectly and tows a lot better. 

F47E1CC3-4EE4-4690-99EB-299C920BD4F4.jpeg

Great looking set of toys!!!

 

Any info on the Camaro? Guessing 2001, 2002 SS?

Edited by JimCost2014
Posted
3 minutes ago, JimCost2014 said:

Great looking set of toys!!!

 

Any info on the Camaro? Guessing 2001, 2002 SS?

Thank you! It’s a 2000 SS with forged 370, F1A-94 procharger, powerglide transmission. It was my first time taking it out with the new setup. Ran mid 9’s. I was having converter issues though. I’ll be back soon to try it out again. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Htown T1 said:

Thank you! It’s a 2000 SS with forged 370, F1A-94 procharger, powerglide transmission. It was my first time taking it out with the new setup. Ran mid 9’s. I was having converter issues though. I’ll be back soon to try it out again. 

You are very welcome.

 

Missed by a year on my guess, great looking car, still street legal?

Posted
1 hour ago, JimCost2014 said:

You are very welcome.

 

Missed by a year on my guess, great looking car, still street legal?

Yes, for the time being it is. Tags are to date and I still take it to local car meets. I soon want to make it a full drag car though. 

Posted
Nice! I had been wondering if you would ditch the Trailrunner ATs at some point. With that nice truck and the 2" lift, those tires never did you justice. 

 

Yea a little sooner than I wanted but definitely Really well worth it

 

8b33d57893c00513ff57376ec0345c30.jpgb0cfb6718820ca3a01910991cb10650c.jpg0dd09bcfaabef40b2cfac06acc13126a.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Posted

Big upgrade weekend. Add a 4” zone lift (so gives me 6” total), Fox 2.5 coilovers in the front, Fox 2.0 in the rear, flares, new tires and wheels. 

D6D657C0-9302-4DB4-A4EB-62520ED5D63D.jpeg

3DF16B4B-50DE-4B29-8CC6-12FB04D92791.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, TXguy said:

Big upgrade weekend. Add a 4” zone lift (so gives me 6” total), Fox 2.5 coilovers in the front, Fox 2.0 in the rear, flares, new tires and wheels. 

D6D657C0-9302-4DB4-A4EB-62520ED5D63D.jpeg

3DF16B4B-50DE-4B29-8CC6-12FB04D92791.jpeg

Look's Good - What's the tire size ?? Thanks

Posted
4 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 

Yea a little sooner than I wanted but definitely Really well worth it

 

0dd09bcfaabef40b2cfac06acc13126a.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

?? Just the beefier shoulder of the KO2 alone makes it look much, much better. ?? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...