Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did some more towing. Probably around 8000lbs again. This time up the highway around Atlanta. Still able to get up and go even with the 5.3. Was able to cruise 80 without much struggling or obnoxious down shifting. 

20210313_124748.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Ordered a Borla Touring exhaust - looking forward to a sound improvement, and hopefully no drone.  Got tired of this thing looking mean and sounding like a dishwasher.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, romclean1 said:

Ordered a Borla Touring exhaust - looking forward to a sound improvement, and hopefully no drone.  Got tired of this thing looking mean and sounding like a dishwasher.

You’ll love it. I have the GM Performance exhaust, which is the same system. Really adds some good feels when driving. Like you said, the exhaust matches the aggressive styling. 😎

Posted
I got new tires! 
2A81A8E7-6A90-494A-A293-23FF48BF75D4.jpeg.25564ee07422e0a003e5cf85dac4f087.jpeg
BBA4E745-F48A-4D77-8A74-1B2146F8A98F.jpeg.d32baebaf29172ffe0443ddcf801b5b3.jpeg

This might be the prettiest truck I’ve ever seen. More pics?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
16 hours ago, lapoolboy said:

Installed my catch can at 440 miles before intake and valves get nasty.

PXL_20210314_221620038.jpg

Did you do the dual valve?  Looks great, I've only read good things about the UPR products.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Gangly said:

Did you do the dual valve?  Looks great, I've only read good things about the UPR products.

No, I always have run the single.  It connects inline between the driver side valve cover and intake port.  I suppose I'd catch more if I ran the dual, but I didn't want a spaghetti bowl of hoses running everywhere and I'm content with the performance of the single.  The intake on my 2017 was spotless when I had it off to install the blower so I'm convinced.

Edited by lapoolboy
Posted
1 minute ago, lapoolboy said:

No, I always have run the single.  It connects online between the driver side valve cover and intake port.  I suppose I'd catch more if I ran the dual, but I didn't want a spaghetti bowl of hoses running everywhere and I'm content with the performance of the single.  The intake on my 2017 was spotless when I had it off to install the blower so I'm convinced.

Good to know.  I'm looking at the single as well and wasn't sure if there was a large enough benefit to invest the extra capital into the dual valve.  Like you mentioned, I didn't want an extra line running across the top of the intake, its already cluttered as it is.

Posted
On 3/12/2021 at 10:18 PM, Therickyp said:

Pro Comp 6 inch lift

20x10 Fuel Rebels in matte black 

35.12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers

Fabtech upper control arms

Shes looking good. 

33BC1730-7C5D-4341-B722-189450E129DB.jpeg

Could you kindly get your truck out of the way so we can see that squarebody...

  • Like 3
  • Haha 3
Posted

Installed my dashcam from my old Sierra finally. The new truck doesn't have a USB port in the glove box like my Sierra had, so I had to hardwire this one in. I used the heated steering wheel fuse, but need to find something that works when in Accessory also. The truck has to be running for the dashcam to have power, which means I have to have it running to download any video. It's a small inconvenience, but one I'd like to remedy. 

 

20210314_144450.jpg

Yi_1615747745452.jpg

Posted
12 hours ago, slumpychuck said:


This might be the prettiest truck I’ve ever seen. More pics?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course! Haha 

C1242D54-4658-4EC7-8E42-9AF526ED733D.jpeg

44EDF33E-C54B-4BBE-811A-A664D4EF0245.jpeg

672D72F3-AF4F-4CF2-881B-372DD17CE551.jpeg

Posted
Of course! Haha 
C1242D54-4658-4EC7-8E42-9AF526ED733D.jpeg.3b7c2c25ca016f6f4423a6e95ac6905c.jpeg
44EDF33E-C54B-4BBE-811A-A664D4EF0245.jpeg.221ffd55d8ae9ffddd2da962042ca19f.jpeg
672D72F3-AF4F-4CF2-881B-372DD17CE551.jpeg.a425aa6aa253ea240a4de59d2028c6dd.jpeg

Gorg. Your setup is awesome, bumper looks great, bed rack is sweet.. nice job all the way around. If I had to nit pick I’d say she’d look cleaner with the red GMC decals but what the hell do I know. Great truck!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
10 minutes ago, slumpychuck said:


Gorg. Your setup is awesome, bumper looks great, bed rack is sweet.. nice job all the way around. If I had to nit pick I’d say she’d look cleaner with the red GMC decals but what the hell do I know. Great truck!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks! I wanted to make it capable without being too over the top “look at me I’m an overlander” lol.

 

the red did look nice but I personally just hate red!

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Unwrntd said:

Thanks! I wanted to make it capable without being too over the top “look at me I’m an overlander” lol.

 

the red did look nice but I personally just hate red!

Yeah, it looks great. What’s your set up. Tires, lift or level, etc. Sorry if you’ve already posted this information. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...