Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, RugbyRef said:

On another note...the dealership installed all of the "LPO" package stuff yesterday!  

  • Rear under-the-seat storage
  • Center console vault
  • Extended mud flaps
  • 5th-wheel hitch package
  • Kicker system on multi-function tailgate
  • Front recovery hooks

They also gave me the wiring bundle (+ camera) for the trailer rear camera so I can install that this weekend on my car hauler.

 

How  much did they charge for the install of all that stuff?

Also, whats the wiring budnle +camera? have a part number? Interested to know

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, Offroadman00 said:

How  much did they charge for the install of all that stuff?

Also, whats the wiring budnle +camera? have a part number? Interested to know

No charge since it was part of the Black Diamond package that came with the truck.  The dealership had not received all of the "dealer installed options" when I picked my truck up.  The wiring bundle and camera is part of the auxiliary trailer camera set up.  GM includes it as an accessory or as part of a package.  The premise is that when viewed on the front infotainment screen, it gives you a view of a transparent trailer.  The GM part number is 84946379.

Edited by RugbyRef
Posted
On 4/3/2021 at 2:14 PM, TNTSilverado said:

Finally added the BD Trims tailgate letters today that my wife got me for Christmas. Gorgeous 70 degree day in Iowa. Also used the hairdryer to get letters back tailgate extra hot to make sure letters stayed down. Turned out nice. 

DCDB02AA-9FA6-4361-8805-1C78A10404A8.jpeg

Those look nice. I like the outline of the black. Happen to have a link?

Posted
1 hour ago, ms6040 said:

Those look nice. I like the outline of the black. Happen to have a link?

Bd trims off Amazon. Wife has Amazon prime so she ordered them for me during Xmas. 

Posted

Just installed the Rough Country Tow hooks had them powder coated cut some rubber to make it look factory

IMG_2684.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I just got word that my Whipple Supercharger is on the way!

  • Like 6
Posted

Added caps to the ready lift upper control arms

(2 Pack) 2 1/2 Inch (2.5") OD Round Plastic Plug,(8-12Ga for ID 2.17-2.28") Pipe Tubing End Cap, Durable Chair Glide Plug | to Fit Round Tube Size OD 2.500 Inch | Wall Thickness .165" -.109" | by SB https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07H7R7WHY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_GKPDGCYDN9XQEW9ZKA72?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

d0dd26785cfcc39b3ee4c22196bd07de.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted
38 minutes ago, PureZ71 said:

Added caps to the ready lift upper control arms

(2 Pack) 2 1/2 Inch (2.5") OD Round Plastic Plug,(8-12Ga for ID 2.17-2.28") Pipe Tubing End Cap, Durable Chair Glide Plug | to Fit Round Tube Size OD 2.500 Inch | Wall Thickness .165" -.109" | by SB https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07H7R7WHY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_GKPDGCYDN9XQEW9ZKA72?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

d0dd26785cfcc39b3ee4c22196bd07de.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sweet find! Just ordered some myself 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, PureZ71 said:

Added caps to the ready lift upper control arms

(2 Pack) 2 1/2 Inch (2.5") OD Round Plastic Plug,(8-12Ga for ID 2.17-2.28") Pipe Tubing End Cap, Durable Chair Glide Plug | to Fit Round Tube Size OD 2.500 Inch | Wall Thickness .165" -.109" | by SB https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07H7R7WHY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_GKPDGCYDN9XQEW9ZKA72?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

d0dd26785cfcc39b3ee4c22196bd07de.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do they press-fit in snugly or did you have to secure them with something?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, lapoolboy said:

Good luck with that s#&*show!

Are you going to lob a grenade and just run away?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, AEmedic said:

Are you going to lob a grenade and just run away?

Well yeah, I'm not going to sit around and wait on it!  😂

 

I had a very bad experience with them and it cost me over $500 to return the kit to them. Their CS won't win any awards.  The remote tuning thing just does not seem to work reliably.  If your truck is bone stock otherwise, they *might* be able to get it close.  I highly suggest you have it tuned locally.

 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

Well yeah, I'm not going to sit around and wait on it!  😂

 

I had a very bad experience with them and it cost me over $500 to return the kit to them. Their CS won't win any awards.  The remote tuning thing just does not seem to work reliably.  If your truck is bone stock otherwise, they *might* be able to get it close.  I highly suggest you have it tuned locally.

 

 

I appreciate the candor!  Was there something wrong with the kit?  They stipulate on their website that their tune will only work with the mildest of upgrades and anything further than a cat-back exhaust will need to be tuned locally.  All I have is a Borla cat-back and I'm not looking to do more than the supercharger.  I hope I have no issues...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...