Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Question for the experts
I dont currently have fog lights, would it be possible to wire this switch and also make use of the fog light button using my own wire/pins/relays I know it wont go through the BCM and turn the light on the dash but is it possible? Does anyone have the pinout for these switches?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ManitobaDiesel said:

Checked power and am getting about 13.5 volts from the switches plug to the bcm plugs, 

Hmm. Im out... hopefully Pgamboa or tinkeringfox will chime in now. Alot of people said that there was no programming needed. Since mine is a 14, its not possible for me anyway. I used a latching relay so there was no bcm integration needed. It works perfectly.

 

Screenshot_20190704-153207_Amazon Shopping.jpg

SmartSelect_20190704-153414_Gallery.jpg

Edited by RACERX7775
  • Like 1
Posted

To repost again for those who cant get theirs to work through the BCM, I posted on page 13 how to wire up the latching relay shown above this post.  Mine works perfectly and is a instant on and off. No long press..

Screenshot_20190704-190821_Samsung Internet.jpg

Posted

Are there any more of the less expensive switches out there or did y’all buy them all up already?

Posted

so i have a 2017 wt/lt. no fogs or orl . if i was to buy the blue replacement oem switch bought the harness adapter for orl. for running a 40" behind grill led bar.could i or is there a way to wire the fog light button to my 2 6" led cubes on my roll bar for back up lites off switch or shud i leave them connected to my reverse lights/cargo light switch w diode for constant on off? tnx

 

Posted

Posted before but, if someone has a red orl switch and wants a blue one, im up for a swap and some cash to you. I did the denali cluster and android  auto upgrade and got WAMS to change the radio display the Intellilink so it matches the cluster. I swapped everything else to red but cant get a red orl switch. Well, not for $125 anyway.....

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Dumb question but I'm getting tired of scrolling through this long thread, are the switch part numbers the same for 1500, 2500 and 3500s?

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 9/22/2018 at 3:41 PM, pgamboa said:

Ok folks, for anyone wanting this headlight switch harness, I have them ready made, and ready to ship.

 

$35 shipped anywhere in the US.

 

They are built with the same specs as shown in the video by Tinkering Fox.

 

Harness is labeled for easy installation!

 

Thanks to @Tinkering Fox for collaborating with me on this project!

 

PM me to order.

 

904b79b7340ef343716e92cc00648a3d.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Buying!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks for the great info! Video is awesome, best instructional I've seen. Does the switch work when your vehicle is completely off? As in, could you just open your door and turn those lights on? Or do you need the keys in the ignition? Thanks!

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 12/1/2019 at 11:01 PM, Apache32Bravo said:

Buying!

Still available?

 

Edit...Ordered from Harness Dr. (pgamboa)

Edited by Lnafree
Posted (edited)

WANTING TO BUY!!

 

Red ORL headlight switch for GMC Sierra. Part number  23458495.   If you have one for sale please let me know asap. Thanks all.

 

SmartSelect_20200109-203939_Gallery.jpg

Edited by RACERX7775

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...