Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Might be old news for some, but I couldn't find any documentation on it. With kids falling out of open doors these days, whenever I shift from park, the doors lock before fluid has time to fill the clutch packs.

 

If one is to pull the door handle to open the locked door, twice, it will unlock and allow occupants to fall out, while in gear or neutral. 

 

But no matter how many times you push the tailgate button to drop the gate with the truck in neutral with drivers door open or closed, it will not open. Making a person to go back to the cab and put it in park, just to open the gate. They aren't making these things for old farmers any longer. 

 

The lack of a manual gearbox was a big surprise. 

Posted
Might be old news for some, but I couldn't find any documentation on it. With kids falling out of open doors these days, whenever I shift from park, the doors lock before fluid has time to fill the clutch packs.
 
If one is to pull the door handle to open the locked door, twice, it will unlock and allow occupants to fall out, while in gear or neutral. 
 
But no matter how many times you push the tailgate button to drop the gate with the truck in neutral with drivers door open or closed, it will not open. Making a person to go back to the cab and put it in park, just to open the gate. They aren't making these things for old farmers any longer. 
 
The lack of a manual gearbox was a big surprise. 


From someone who “farms”: why wouldn’t you put the truck in park when you get off to open the tailgate?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jav_eee said:

 


From someone who “farms”: why wouldn’t you put the truck in park when you get off to open the tailgate?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

Guess it's old school. Not so much getting out just to open the tailgate, but livestock gates, checking the rain gauge, checking the mailbox, checking pivots, opening up the shop doors, picking up irrigation pipe, checking the transmission fluid, etc.

 

Here, we have flat ground. Truck might roll 2 feet and stop. In 70 years I've never used park, unless it was for parking, not stopping. If it was rolling, set the parking brake. Use park when shutting engine off. 

 

Kinda like using the manuals. Engine running and stopped, shift out of gear, set parking brake if rolling, Parking with engine off, dump it into second gear.

 

You might not know, but ford had a phase in life that the autos would jump out of park, into reverse.

 

To each his own.

Posted

I found out LED headlights suck in snow. No heat is generated and you have to keep stopping to brush the snow off at night. This i really don't like.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Duramaxsky said:

I found out LED headlights suck in snow. No heat is generated and you have to keep stopping to brush the snow off at night. This i really don't like.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
 

I was wondering about that! I haven't driven in those conditions yet, where you couldn't keep the windshield clear on max defrost, at anything over 40 mph.

 

Then throw in, following or meeting vehicles with that mist spray.

 

But "here", I drive more at night, when conditions are more favorable. I really like the led's for that.

 

It's always something, huh?

  • Like 1
Posted

 
You might not know, but ford had a phase in life that the autos would jump out of park, into reverse.
 
To each his own.


I actually know someone who was killed many many years back (way before cell phones) when his Chevy came out of park and pinned him between the truck and gate. He was found later that night.

That being said I still can’t figure out why neutral. Park is so much easier to shift into, I find it takes effort to hit the neutral notch. Guess you get better at it the more you use it. Like you said, to each their own!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
On 12/20/2020 at 2:07 PM, Duramaxsky said:

Better fuel mileage had nothing to do with the choice. I would have bought a Ford if they had a more powerful engine that was not a mouse with a supercharger or turbo. I like big old school V8 power. I figured it likely got worse mileage than the 5.3. So that is dosen't is just a nice benefit. But I would have bought an F150 if the 5.3 was the biggest engine GM had. Not enough bigger than the 5.3 to buy the Chevy.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
 

I jumped from a 2010 5.3 to 6.2.  The 6.2 is more fuel efficient.  The only concern I have with it is the availability of premium fuel on some of my recreation routes.  Mostly 87 octane, regular unleaded is all available at gas stations.  I'm wondering if something like Lucas octane boost would be me 4 points with a 15oz bottle per 25 gallon fill up.  It is that or carry a lot of gas cans.  I had a bigger capacity tank in my older GM as well, which I prefer.

Posted
I jumped from a 2010 5.3 to 6.2.  The 6.2 is more fuel efficient.  The only concern I have with it is the availability of premium fuel on some of my recreation routes.  Mostly 87 octane, regular unleaded is all available at gas stations.  I'm wondering if something like Lucas octane boost would be me 4 points with a 15oz bottle per 25 gallon fill up.  It is that or carry a lot of gas cans.  I had a bigger capacity tank in my older GM as well, which I prefer.
I have never really seen that. Most stations have premium. When I got my Duramax in 03 diesel was a little hard to find
Now most stations have it.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

Posted
25 minutes ago, Duramaxsky said:

I have never really seen that. Most stations have premium. When I got my Duramax in 03 diesel was a little hard to find
Now most stations have it.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
 

Just telling you my experience.  Rural, small town gas stations don't have 91 on pump in my area.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just telling you my experience.  Rural, small town gas stations don't have 91 on pump in my area.
Maybe things are different in the west. Here you need to be more worried about how far the exits are from each other. In UT MT and parts of ID you need to stop before it's too late. Another thing that sucks with our small tanks. Towns with stations can be close to 50 miles apart.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

Posted

I use to live in Salt Lake City and would drive to Grants Pass, OR to visit extended family. My route had me get off I-80 and take over 200 miles of back roads, that even today doesn't have towns, gas stations, or even cell phone reception. Get off I-80 in Winnemucca, NV and head to Lakeview, OR. Back in the 80s there was a gas station in Denio, NV, and it was about midway between the 2 towns. That station is closed. And, because of Oregon's laws stating you can't pump your own gas, if you got to Lakeview, OR you were stuck until the gas station opened in the morning. I use to have a car that was limited to the distance, and I spent at least 1 winter night freezing my butt off in the car waiting for the gas station to open. I'm glad these trucks are capable of better mpg. Still, I make sure to top off the gas in Winnemucca just in case something happens. I've hit many big storms on this route, and helped many people who've become stranded. Oh, and the entire 200 miles is open range with no fencing. It's not uncommon to suddenly find a herd of cows in the middle of the highway in the middle of the night.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted
I use to live in Salt Lake City and would drive to Grants Pass, OR to visit extended family. My route had me get off I-80 and take over 200 miles of back roads, that even today doesn't have towns, gas stations, or even cell phone reception. Get off I-80 in Winnemucca, NV and head to Lakeview, OR. Back in the 80s there was a gas station in Denio, NV, and it was about midway between the 2 towns. That station is closed. And, because of Oregon's laws stating you can't pump your own gas, if you got to Lakeview, OR you were stuck until the gas station opened in the morning. I use to have a car that was limited to the distance, and I spent at least 1 winter night freezing my butt off in the car waiting for the gas station to open. I'm glad these trucks are capable of better mpg. Still, I make sure to top off the gas in Winnemucca just in case something happens. I've hit many big storms on this route, and helped many people who've become stranded. Oh, and the entire 200 miles is open range with no fencing. It's not uncommon to suddenly find a herd of cows in the middle of the highway in the middle of the night.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


Even going north from Winnemucca it's a very long way to the next fuel stop. It's Jackpot. Last time I was there they were getting over $6 a gallon. But the next fuel is I 84 in Idaho. I took the new truck to Salt Lake last October towing my 30' trailer. I ran out on 84 just before Twin Falls. I knew that might happen so I had 5 gallons of premium in the bed. Also 5 gallons of ethanol free regular for the generator. I could use that if needed. But it wasn't. When I got to Twin Falls I filled the 5 gallons in the can incase I did it again. I have decided that truck sucks for towing. Small fuel tank is one reason. Bad fuel mileage is another. And it's just not nearly as stable as the old Duramax either. It's nicer and all but me and the little lady agree the old truck is better for long trips towing. It has a 45 gallon transfer flow tank in place of the stock one and another 12 in the bed with a pump to move it to the main tank while driving. It will make it from Seattle to Twin Falls on that easy. It took 3 tanks and the 5 in the new truck. Then it didn't make it to SLC from there. The old one makes it there with over half a tank left and not needing the tank in the bed. And it handles the 80 MPH speed limits in ID and UT better. Much more stable and less loss of fuel mileage due to the higher speed. The 6.2 has plenty of power though. I was surprised how well it pulled up Cabbage out of Pendleton OR. Almost as well as the Duramax. I didn't expect that.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You need a better code reader/scanner.  You are missing codes.  Did the dealer give you a copy of the SAVI scan from that visit?     If the fluid hasn't been changed, change it.  Shudder will likely go away.  
    • TLDR to my other post...   Hard. Pass.  Too many what ifs.     Are you set on a 3.0 Duramax?  Have you considered anything not GM just in case?  If you don't have to have a pickup, lots of other options for $27,000 out there.   
    • I see some red flags.   - No mention in the Carfax if the oil pump belt was changed.  LM2s had a 150,000mi service interval, and its got 164,245mi on it.  So right out the gate it needs about $3000-3500 for that to be done before driving it another 150,000mi.  Belt is at the rear of the engine.     - If something happens to the transmission valve body, the special coverage is expired by mileage.  That will likely be an out of pocket expense, with zero or near zero GM participation if something happened even though its in by time.   - 2020 LM2s seem to need timing chains after 80,000mi at some point.  They fixed this end of 2020/starting 2021 model year engines.  They will usually set a P0016 I think?  There is another $8000-10,000 if it needs a chain.  The main chain is at the back, secondary at the front so the pump belt would be done at the same time if it needed chains.     - Long oil change intervals.  7,000-8,000mi on average, probably close to 0% or perhaps to or beyond 0% on the OLM.  Lots of them not at the dealer which makes me wonder how much of the oil ran through that truck was the proper Dexos D rated 0w20 oil and not just gas engine 0w20, which is not the same at all.     - Long fuel filter changes, again likely taking the fuel filter life to 0% or more.  First one went 28,603, second was done 43,094 miles later at 71,697, from there another 46,452mi to 118,149mi, and then the most recent one 37,026mi later at 155,175mi.  So counting its original fuel filter, its had only 4 fuel filters on it.  No bueno IMO.         Good news?    - It has had only two warranty trips to the dealer.  The first free service (end of December 2020 on the Carfax), and the transmission reprogram recall (end of August 2025 on the Carfax).     - Truck did a LOT of moving, so that might explain the lack of emissions related repairs like bad NOX sensors, bad exhaust temp sensors, bad glow plugs, etc.         The "emissions system checked" could just be how something was flagged for Carfax.  GM dealers have to do SAVI reports for warranty repair orders so they scan the truck.  So its possible that is there for that?  
    • Thank you, @Z45!   NOTE - No all repair shop/Dealers reports to Carfax   That is my main concern.  The CARFAX looks way too clean for a 6 year old anything with 164,245 miles.  Even something known for reliability (like many Toyotas) typically has a lot more replaced, like a Nav screen, interior trim, shock/strut, or brake pads.  And surely the last set of tires (installed at ~58k miles) would be bald unless those were all highway miles.   I'm tempted to pay a local dealer to look up the VIN, but am not sure if that will be worthwhile.  Last time I did this, it was 100% useless, and I felt scammed - they noted the bumper was replaced years ago and that's it.  A 5-year old could spot the accident damage, even though nothing was on the CARFAX.   After giving the dealer a call, the truck may have a hard shift, but they have to verify with their mechanic if that's even a concern.  And I've test driven about a dozen of these now, many near Chicago, and half the trucks shift hard/odd at all throttle positions.  The ones with aftermarket lifts/larger tires shift terrible, and 3 stock trucks shifted so violently I thought the transmission valve body was going out.   At this point I'm conflicted, as I need a vehicle, and am coming up short locally.  Northern trucks in this price range tend to have either multiple owners, a lot of mods (lifts/oversized tires without re-gearing), and are generally in rougher shape.   If this truck showed up in your neighborhood for $27k and you had to purchase it sight-unseen, with the possibility of needing a 10L80 rebuild, torque converter, or rear end - would you do it?  I'm convinced most of the 10L80 trucks I test drove are broken, they can't all shift so bad, with massive flares/slipping/lurching and mis-matched downshifts like a teen driver learning stick.
    • From the spy shots, the front end does look like it's borrowing some styling cues from the Canyon. I'm more interested in the powertrain news than the screens though. If the 3.0 diesel survives into the next generation, that alone will keep a lot of current owners interested.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...