Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, warhawk89 said:

For record keeping, the body shop says the issues they found were the cracks in the upper rear pillars and cracks within the plastic assembly.

Here's photos of the repair process.

IMG_1131.jpg

IMG_1134.jpg

IMG_1133.jpg

IMG_0948.jpg

IMG_0947.jpg

IMG_0946.jpg

IMG_0945.jpg

IMG_0944.jpg

Did they take your window out without removing the spoiler?

and that caked on yellow stuff looks like the original repair wasn’t done like the TSB requires....

doesnt look anything like other repairs on here

Posted
9 hours ago, Centrebaseball said:

Did they take your window out without removing the spoiler?

and that caked on yellow stuff looks like the original repair wasn’t done like the TSB requires....

doesnt look anything like other repairs on here

Yeah the rear window assembly is removed by removing the back seats to disconnect the electronics and then they can cut your window out with basically string. The glass guys will clean up the old caulk etc and just install it. It turned out better than factory. The spoiler doesn't need to come off for that purpose but they will remove the spoiler during the initial TSB caulk job.

 

As for the yellow stuff aka the caulk, it was applied as the TSB says to do so just in a crappy fashion. You have to remember dealer's and service techs don't really care about warranty stuff like this and are gonna half ass things.

I had GM forward the window and the bill to a third-party collision body shop for all my repairs moving forward. So, they did a bang up job on the window swap.

Posted
On 1/30/2020 at 5:53 AM, UGADawgs said:

Picked up the truck last night after the window swap. They assured me everything was QA'd. It was dark and raining, so really only got to review the inside. They scratched the nuts out of both pillars. I told the advisor to order new plastic for each side and I'd come back for them to replace. He said he'd have to review with his manager in the morning and took pics. I don't understand how technicians have a complete lack of effort, nor attention to detail, and no cares about other people's property.

 

 

IMG_20200129_181120.jpg

So service guy yesterday told me yesterday that one side's replacement panel was in Michigan but the side is on backorder. yay! :(

Posted
On 12/29/2019 at 1:45 PM, hiranger said:

I had purchased mine in March and only been driving to work (4.5 miles each way) so I didn't ever see, November 11th we went to the In-laws and it was raining, My 10 year old says I'm getting wet, It was scheduled for its first oil change on the 26th, said they would need to keep it for about a week, I told them I would need a loaner can't be without wheels for a week, so I had to wait almost 1 month, they called, I dropped mine off and pick up a 2019 Z71, last night we are coming back again from my in-laws, we stop to get gas and my 4 year old daughter Mom! this truck leaks in the same place as daddy's truck!

mine.jpg

My Silverado

loaner.jpg

Their Loaner Z71

Well took them 21 days working on my, Thinking I've had it back for 2 weeks now, Initially I got it on a Thursday had to take it back on Monday seems they did the brake recall and broke it, they only kept it a day on that. So far no leaking.

Posted

I had brought my 2019 silverado in for the rear window leak and they repaired it using the service bulletin. I went in to go pick it up after the repair and told them i wasnt accepting it because their worksmanship for the repair, and also they did not clean up the rust that had built up on the bottom seat bracket. They called me back after the weekend and said it was g2g so i went to pick it up. There was still seam sealer left on the window and its visible between the glass and body. Minor issue because you wouldnt notice it if you werent looking. It looks like they tried to remove the rust with a wire brush and sand paper. They actually took off the paint in some spots down to bare medal. And i also noticed a white mark on the plastic trim on top of the sliding glass. Looks like some seam sealer made it onto the plastic and they used a harsh chemical to try and remove it. So after fighting with the dealership and GM i am scheduled to return the truck Monday to have a GM representative to take a look at it. Why does this process have to be such a PAIN. The dealership said i have to get with GM to figure out the next steps, and GM said that the dealership should be handling. No one knows their asses from a hat and as soon as they have your money it seems like they do not care whatsoever. What exactly is the GM rep going to do? Why does a gm rep have to look at it after it was the dealers fault their technicians are incompetent? I have had less problems with my 90s japanese shitbox. Very frustrating experience. Especially this being my very first new vehicle purchase.

Posted

Well.. guess you can add me to the list of leaky rear windows. 19 Sierra with a build date of 07/2019. Calling my dealer today to schedule an appointment to get this fixed.

 

I know this thread is lengthy, but any advice anyone can give thats dealing with this? Do i push for a full window replacement? 

 

C675C437-8097-44A0-B724-8A0CAF7E06F4.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, Tomtom87 said:

Well.. guess you can add me to the list of leaky rear windows. 19 Sierra with a build date of 07/2019. Calling my dealer today to schedule an appointment to get this fixed.

 

I know this thread is lengthy, but any advice anyone can give thats dealing with this? Do i push for a full window replacement? 

 

C675C437-8097-44A0-B724-8A0CAF7E06F4.jpeg

Best bet is to try and find a crack on that plastic piece up there and point it out because the TSB is to replace a window if a crack is there.  Absent a crack, they are supposed to do the caulk job and at that point you are at the mercy of whatever GM and the dealer decide to do. Good luck.  Keep checking in here.  

Posted

Yeah tbh, just crack it if it's not visible. Save yourself the time and bypass the entire nonsense of the TSB.

Go ahead and call GM and escalate it to a supervisor so you can have a case # for record keeping purposes.

Other than that, it's just a time process of going and coming back and forth until it's done right. Stick in there everyone!

UPDATE: Took the trail boss down through the sticks and some mud in the pouring rain this weekend and the new window hasn't leaked yet. Still have that sense of paranoia though. Stellar.

Posted

Dropped mine at the dealer today for a new window, recalls and first service. Keep your fingers crossed for me . Once I opened a case with GMC, my window showed up in two days, my appointment was made and I got a loaner car, which I was originally told, loaner car, no way. I was told that about the loaner car because I had not purchased the car at the dealership I am having the service done. Don't let the dealerships jerk you around on this, open a case, document everything from the day you discovered your leak, be courteous and professional with everyone you deal with, and then keep your fingers crossed. I'll update on the other side.

Posted
2 hours ago, Minnvmax said:

Is there a chance they will never leak? Mine built April 2019 hasn't yet.  

I'm dying to know this as well. I just checked and mine has the same build date as a recent poster. I haven't gone through an automatic carwash yet (mostly because I was worried about the mirrors clearing. This truck feels wider than my last one) but we have had some heavy rains in the 6 weeks that I have owned it.

Posted

It would be great to have a compiled list of build dates and plants and even which truck/cab size that each one is.

 

 

Posted

I agree. I have no use for the little tiny opening in the back window and would gladly have taken a solid rear window if it meant never having to worry about a leak...

Posted
15 minutes ago, disneybaker said:

Is the leak on 2020 also? Sucks they force it on you in option package

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Curious as well. Is there a certain build date after which they have addressed/solved this problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...