Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Happy for you Sam on the potential resolution.  Mine showed up 19 days after buying the truck and from the stain on the headliner it was leaking before I bought it.  I'm still waiting on GM to contact me.  According to NC law they've got until the 12th.  

So glad I’m not getting the slider, why wasn’t there a problem before, my parents have 16 & 17, not one leak ever, why don’t they just go back to that older style, how many people aren’t on the forums that have this problem, But pissed I can’t get XM because I’m not getting the slider

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

It would be nice to have one lawyer represent all of us on this junk.    

  • Like 3
Posted

Someone a long while back mentioned class action discussions with a law firm.  I wonder what became of that? 
 

I looked at one of my rental car invoices while I was driving around waiting for a window - 2 grand! GM is losing their shirt  no on this stuff I would imagine. 

Posted

This is so disheartening to read all these problems with this issue. Im hoping that my appointment with my dealer I can push for a full replacement glass.

 

Can GM remedy this with a redesigned rear glass or is this a design flaw that cant be repaired?

Posted
47 minutes ago, Tomtom87 said:

This is so disheartening to read all these problems with this issue. Im hoping that my appointment with my dealer I can push for a full replacement glass.

 

Can GM remedy this with a redesigned rear glass or is this a design flaw that cant be repaired?

Hard for any of us to really guess on that. The rate of new leakers being posted to this thread has really increased over the last 2 months. I think this issue is at the beginning stages of hitting a critical mass. 

 

IF that is true, then GM is likely looking at a redesign of the rear window structure for 2021. That might be too soon, to be honest. 

 

My contention on this is that every truck with a sliding rear window has or WILL leak. Period. The only question is if and when the owners notice it. The majority of owners are not going to notice this unless they are really looking, IMO. With the darkness of the rear cabin, it's hard to see a stain in the headliner unless you're really looking for it. Similarly, you're not going to see the drips from the window unless you're looking on the top of the rear seat. Most owners are innocently ignorant right now. 

Posted

Yikes, just bought a 2020 LT trail boss with rear slider without knowing about this issue. Haven't picked up the truck yet (Saturday). Any advice? Should I buy the extended warranty? Is the extended warranty bought at one dealership good at all of them, in case I switch dealers at some point? 

Posted
This is so disheartening to read all these problems with this issue. Im hoping that my appointment with my dealer I can push for a full replacement glass.
 
Can GM remedy this with a redesigned rear glass or is this a design flaw that cant be repaired?

I’m not an engineer but looking at it, the rubber on top and bottom in exterior seem really cheap, the rubber reminds me of cheap wiper blades


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
8 minutes ago, wacnstac said:

Yikes, just bought a 2020 LT trail boss with rear slider without knowing about this issue. Haven't picked up the truck yet (Saturday). Any advice? Should I buy the extended warranty? Is the extended warranty bought at one dealership good at all of them, in case I switch dealers at some point? 

Check for water stains on the inside of the rear window.Flip up the rear seats, look for rust on the jack, and on the black painted rear seat brackets, and corrosion on the mounting hardware for the back seat. Don't worry, the salesman will know what you are looking for. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, wacnstac said:

Yikes, just bought a 2020 LT trail boss with rear slider without knowing about this issue. Haven't picked up the truck yet (Saturday). Any advice? Should I buy the extended warranty? Is the extended warranty bought at one dealership good at all of them, in case I switch dealers at some point? 

Depends on the warranty. As I understand GM has started offering it’s own extended bumper to bumper warranty plan recently. That is the only one I’d consider, and it would be valid at any GM dealer.

 

If it’s some rinky-dink 3rd party plan like most dealers try to push, I wouldn’t put any faith in it even covering something like a window or headliner replacement. They might re-caulk it for you but who knows. There’s usually a bunch of exclusions in the fine print, so buyer beware.

Posted
21 minutes ago, econometrics said:

Hard for any of us to really guess on that. The rate of new leakers being posted to this thread has really increased over the last 2 months. I think this issue is at the beginning stages of hitting a critical mass. 

 

IF that is true, then GM is likely looking at a redesign of the rear window structure for 2021. That might be too soon, to be honest. 

 

My contention on this is that every truck with a sliding rear window has or WILL leak. Period. The only question is if and when the owners notice it. The majority of owners are not going to notice this unless they are really looking, IMO. With the darkness of the rear cabin, it's hard to see a stain in the headliner unless you're really looking for it. Similarly, you're not going to see the drips from the window unless you're looking on the top of the rear seat. Most owners are innocently ignorant right now. 

The first thing I noticed was an odor like wet carpet, but i could find no evidence of water anywhere. This kept happening, but no water, I had no idea. Then after being in torrential rain in Florida I finally discovered wet carpet just inside the drivers side passenger door. I started doing some research and found this forum, questions answered. Now,  the rest is history, or should I say just the beginning.

Posted
6 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Depends on the warranty. As I understand GM has started offering it’s own extended bumper to bumper warranty plan recently. That is the only one I’d consider, and it would be valid at any GM dealer.

 

If it’s some rinky-dink 3rd party plan like most dealers try to push, I wouldn’t put any faith in it even covering something like a window or headliner replacement. They might re-caulk it for you but who knows. There’s usually a bunch of exclusions in the fine print, so buyer beware.

Maybe i shouldn't show up to pick up the new truck :)

Posted
Just now, wacnstac said:

Maybe i shouldn't show up to pick up the new truck :)

 

Depends on how bad your current ride is. I wouldn't honestly. I've owned mine for 3 months and its spent a good bit of its life at the dealer for transmission issues and now the rear window. Wish I had never traded my 2014 in. 

Posted
1 hour ago, NE18 said:

TFL on YouTube just bought a long term LT trail boss. I hope it leaks!

lol cmon now! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 418 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...