Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Update, they attempted to repair my truck according to the PIP but they weren’t able to remove the stub from the front diff to complete the repair. Apparently there is a specialty tool that is need that no dealer has in my area. The tool is also on back order for the next 30 or so days. They may just send a new front diff but who knows at this point.

 

Called GM and asked a collateral transfer to a new truck that does exhibit this specific issue. Don’t see it getting approved anyway though. I’m going to reach out to a lemon law attorney depending what GM comes back with.

 

any feedback is welcomed!

Posted

Mine goes back in shop on Monday. Gm told dealer to replace stub shaft and parts associated with 5653 in the new diff., that was replaced last time. Said it had the wrong stub shaft in it and that this has fixed nearly all of them. We'll see. This will be the 3rd attempt of repair and I think here in my state, it has to be 4 attempts before considered a lemon.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Posted

Update, GM called me today and wants to potential do a trade... we shall see... not too optimistic about this since I will probably be on the loosing end.

Posted

They offered me a trade a few months into purchasing my truck due to issues. I was all in until they told me I would be taking a huge hit on the truck. They were definitely not helpful so I got a lawyer. Still waiting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

They offered me a trade a few months into purchasing my truck due to issues. I was all in until they told me I would be taking a huge hit on the truck. They were definitely not helpful so I got a lawyer. Still waiting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

So here we are day 10 with the truck still at the dealership, no replacement parts in sight. Going to be reaching out to Chevrolet to do a collateral swap. I did the trade out on my 2018 5.3 for transmission issues

The trade is the way to go, if you do the buyback they will charge usage and you can still be on the hook with GM to payback the additional wear and tear.

Pretty sad, 2 lemons in 2 years!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The dealer near me has a Trail Boss on their lot that I’m interested in but it has the SU4 front axle. Is there anyone here with the SU4 axle that HASN’T had any issues?

Posted

I pulled a bunch of Trail Boss build sheets in my area and all of them have the AAM SU4 front axle (meaning they also have the corresponding AAM SU7 rear axle). Some here have asked why they don’t just swap the whole front axle but I’m guessing (this is just a guess) it’s because of the different fluids used in the axles... dealerships often have a hard enough time putting the correct oil in already. Imagine having 2 different axles from 2 different manufacturers and requiring different fluids for service. 
Since AAM is “American Made” I’m guessing it’s good quality. If this problem is just a noise during certain speeds and not actually doing any damage to the truck, then maybe most can live with it - especially if they enjoy Christmas music haha!

Posted
On 5/29/2020 at 2:52 PM, EricTheRed said:

The dealer near me has a Trail Boss on their lot that I’m interested in but it has the SU4 front axle. Is there anyone here with the SU4 axle that HASN’T had any issues?

Mine has been great. 13000 miles and no issues. I’ve even been driving in the AZ 110 degree heat the last couple weeks. No issues. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, IdahoElevation said:

I have the SU4 axle in a 2020 March build. No noise noticed at 600 miles. 

You may not have enough miles on yours yet. I first noticed, or I should say, my son noticed it when I had a little over 5000 miles on it, it may have been there before that and I just didn't hear it. It is a real faint jingling sound and we only heard it when the stereo/radio wasn't playing.

 

Funny thing too, is my last trip was about 2 hrs long, and the outside temp was about 80°F same conditions as when I have heard it before, only this time I could not hear it, I now have 9800 miles on it. I will listen for it again before I take it back into the service department.

 

Hopefully they've corrected the problem and yours is good.

Posted (edited)

My 2020 replacement also has the same SU4 built last week in November no sound. They must have figured it out and fixed it late in the year of 2019. 6800 miles so far so good.

Edited by ILSilverado
Posted
On 6/2/2020 at 9:45 AM, EricTheRed said:

I pulled a bunch of Trail Boss build sheets in my area and all of them have the AAM SU4 front axle (meaning they also have the corresponding AAM SU7 rear axle). Some here have asked why they don’t just swap the whole front axle but I’m guessing (this is just a guess) it’s because of the different fluids used in the axles... dealerships often have a hard enough time putting the correct oil in already. Imagine having 2 different axles from 2 different manufacturers and requiring different fluids for service. 
Since AAM is “American Made” I’m guessing it’s good quality. If this problem is just a noise during certain speeds and not actually doing any damage to the truck, then maybe most can live with it - especially if they enjoy Christmas music haha!

For some reason, I was under the impression that the TBs don't suffer from this. Even though they have an SU4 axle, could the 2" lift change it enough that the noise isn't there? 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

For some reason, I was under the impression that the TBs don't suffer from this. Even though they have an SU4 axle, could the 2" lift change it enough that the noise isn't there? 

Not true, I have an AT4 with the SU4 front axle that made noise...

 

Dealer was finally able to get the stub shaft out with a wedge. They had to pull the diff cover, and put the wedge between the center pin and stub shaft to get it out. When the shaft was reinstalled with the PIP parts, the shaft went right back to touching the center pin. Me and the tech saw it first hand and it didn't look right. Oh well, the noise maker 7000 is put back together and still making noise, just not as loud... Yet...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,532 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...