Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Picked up my 2020 Custom last Friday. 
Had the dealer swap the console for the LT opening center console and install Amp steps. Waiting on a hard rolling bed cover to arrive. Trying to hold off leveling and wheels/tires for a bit and just drive it! 

Screen Shot 2020-10-19 at 1.04.35 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-10-19 at 1.04.52 PM.png

  • Like 1
Posted

6.6 Gas I picked up this fall.

 

I was looking real hard at 2019+ Ram 2500's with the 6.4/8speed but wanted to keep Autotrac for when my wife drives it in the winter. So far I'm happy with the towing and braking performance, especially compared to the 2008 1500 5.3/4speed I had.

20201002_174157_LI.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

I just picked up my 2020 GMC Sierra 2500HD Denali with the Duramax to replace my 2019 Ram 1500 Limited.  I love this new truck and I really love the Pacific Blue.

 

 

IMG_2586.jpg

IMG_2585.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, m.b.b. said:

Picked this bad boy up this week - 2021 HD 3500 Black Diamond Denali

675736496_2021HD3500BlackDiamondDenali.thumb.jpg.c0f5362124fbf51b3cfef22c6ff47b53.jpg

Very nice. I wish I had or could get those running boards on my 2020 DRW...

Posted
15 minutes ago, Tomato said:

Very nice. I wish I had or could get those running boards on my 2020 DRW...

Whats wrong with the AMP Research option? 

Posted
14 hours ago, m.b.b. said:

Picked this bad boy up this week - 2021 HD 3500 Black Diamond Denali

 

lets see some more pics of those steps. opened, close ups, lights, etc....

they look very similar to Amp

curious minds want to know

Posted
14 hours ago, gSwift said:

Whats wrong with the AMP Research option? 

Nothing is wrong with them, but the GM look better and are way more functional. One thing I do see, however, is that the GM ones do not come down like the Amp's. When I had Amps in the past, I really liked the fact that they dropped down like they do. Check out the video: 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Tomato said:

Nothing is wrong with them, but the GM look better and are way more functional. One thing I do see, however, is that the GM ones do not come down like the Amp's. When I had Amps in the past, I really liked the fact that they dropped down like they do. Check out the video: 

 

those are the power boards for the 1500s.

they are completely different and not even comparable to the new ones on the HD trucks

Posted
17 hours ago, m.b.b. said:

Picked this bad boy up this week - 2021 HD 3500 Black Diamond Denali

675736496_2021HD3500BlackDiamondDenali.thumb.jpg.c0f5362124fbf51b3cfef22c6ff47b53.jpg

m.b.b. - Please post a pic of your steps deployed and describe how they work. Thanks.

Posted

I have a 2020 HD Denali with the AMP steps.  My dad bought a 2021 HD Denali a few days ago with the OEM steps.  The differences that I have seen so far:

1. AMP steps move much faster

2. AMP steps drop lower

3. AMP steps seem to stick out farther and the surface of the step seem wider

4. OEM steps have a button for manual movement down next to the hill decent control

5. OEM steps are integrated into the system settings in the infotainment system

6. OEM steps seem to produce less noise when they retract

7. OEM steps have a chrome strip on the leading edge

8. OEM steps don't take up the ODB port

9. OEM steps meant that I didn't have to install them

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Tomato said:

Nothing is wrong with them, but the GM look better and are way more functional. One thing I do see, however, is that the GM ones do not come down like the Amp's. When I had Amps in the past, I really liked the fact that they dropped down like they do. Check out the video: 

 

Wow, the ones on that 1500 in the video are completely different than the ones on my 2018 Yukon. My Yukon steps dropped down like the AMP steps do. 

 

I'll probably end up ordering my AMP's in the next week or two.

Posted
1 hour ago, falk1rk said:

I have a 2020 HD Denali with the AMP steps.  My dad bought a 2021 HD Denali a few days ago with the OEM steps.  The differences that I have seen so far:

1. AMP steps move much faster

2. AMP steps drop lower

3. AMP steps seem to stick out farther and the surface of the step seem wider

4. OEM steps have a button for manual movement down next to the hill decent control

5. OEM steps are integrated into the system settings in the infotainment system

6. OEM steps seem to produce less noise when they retract

7. OEM steps have a chrome strip on the leading edge

8. OEM steps don't take up the ODB port

9. OEM steps meant that I didn't have to install them

Do your Dad's move back towards the bed like the video? Thanks!

Posted
2 hours ago, Tomato said:

Do your Dad's move back towards the bed like the video? Thanks!

Nope, his drop and lower just like the AMP steps do, straight up and down, no backward movement.

 

I did notice one other thing about the OEM steps, they are longer than the AMP steps.  The OEM steps start behind the front splash guard and end almost right at the back of the cab, the AMPs are a few inches shorter.

Posted
I have a 2020 HD Denali with the AMP steps.  My dad bought a 2021 HD Denali a few days ago with the OEM steps.  The differences that I have seen so far: 1. AMP steps move much faster

2. AMP steps drop lower

3. AMP steps seem to stick out farther and the surface of the step seem wider

4. OEM steps have a button for manual movement down next to the hill decent control

5. OEM steps are integrated into the system settings in the infotainment system

6. OEM steps seem to produce less noise when they retract

7. OEM steps have a chrome strip on the leading edge

8. OEM steps don't take up the ODB port

9. OEM steps meant that I didn't have to install them

 

Also oem steps have an oem factory or extended warranty since they came with vehicle. My 12 lml had defective brackets thanks to poor amp manufacturering and were redesigned. So after paying to install them, I was the one who spent hours fixing them and tweaking them to fit better. Not worth it. 

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...