Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

I wanted to see what everyone puts in their trucks my truck for example I was running super low so I ran to Arco for 10$ of gas just to get to my Chevron I usually go to and I felt like the arco gas wasn’t as efficient... have any of you noticed this between stations? I now stick to shell and chevron and very occasionally Costco

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Edited by Sunnyd360
Posted

I use 93 octane almost exclusively. There’s a Mobil station directly across the street from Walmart and they match their prices so pretty reasonable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

That is nice! I have to drive to a 76 station about 2 miles for the best price in town that competes with a grocery store gas price! 

  • Like 1
Posted

Top Tier only.

Used Costco exclusively for years in our vehicles. Closest.

Now using Shell Top Tier. Closest since moving.

  • Like 1
Posted

Chevron, Shell, 76 only*. 

 

If i have to run something else i go with 91 octane(highest nominal octane i can get in CA).

Posted

For me, it's Mexican gas.

 

There's a good reason for it.. no ethanol. I get significantly better gas mileage.

  • Like 2
Posted

From someone that works in oil and gas industry, check and see what refineries are close... your shell and chevron may be the same fuel. A lot of refineries sell to other retailers are thier refinery may be to far to truck and purchase base fuel and add their own additives.

I usually go to Shell as their fuel is usually the best and I like their points system.

Chevron is what I use in my jeep as they have 94 octane on it's own pump so theres no cross contamination from 87, but the closest refinery is 1000miles 1600km away so I'm almost certain its Petro can / sunaco fuel or Shell, also chevron and shell say no ethanol on their top tier fuels.

Sent from my SM-N975W using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I usually run either Costco or BP. If I'm low on gas and the closest station is an Exxon or a Shell, it doesn't really matter to me. 

Posted

I don't even care where I fill up, I've never once looked at the pump to see what it says for top tier or blah blah blah.

 

Around here it's BP, Holiday, Speedways, Shell or Kwik Trips. I will fill up at any of them without a care.

 

Hell I even fill up by the family cabin at the only station open in town on the weekends, they have 4 pumps total. They are getting the same gas that the two larger cities 15 miles away are getting so it doesn't matter to me.

  • Haha 1
Posted

I don't notice any difference in power, performance, or mpg no matter which fuel I use, and for that matter never have with any of my vehicles so I say go for the least expensive.  BTW, I typically keep vehicals for around 15 years and approximately 200K miles and have never had a fuel related problem with any of them

Posted

Holiday because I got card when I bought my truck to get 10cents off and 5 dollars car wash (touchless usually cost $11) and put 87. I wish my truck can take flex fuel because it is cheaper and my old truck felt peppier using e85

 

 

Posted (edited)

The benefit you get from using any particular 'branded' fuel is generally psychological. Here in Southern ON, there are tons of brands, but only a small handful of refineries. Gas stations take fuel from wherever they can get it. I know a guy who runs a business hauling fuel & they go wherever availability is best when keeping stations supplied. There are a lot of factors at play, including maintenance shutdowns, time of year, what type of crude is being refined & other factors that can determine availability. 
Gas at Shell is the same as Costco, is the same as Esso, is the same as Petro Can, is the same as Mobil, is the same as MacEwen, is the same as some hole in the wall brand.
It's the same in the US, as the refining is done by a small amount of companies, but they supply lots of different branded stations. 

I shop by price, or convenience, use 87 & always have. No issues.
 

Edited by Nanotech Environmental
Posted (edited)

No name brand non-ethanol 87 gets the best mileage for me and that is all my older vehicles get, well two of them require premium, but still, non-ethanol for them too. The newer vehicles it doesn't matter, any 87 will do. I dump some Techtron in now and then and have never had a fuel related problem. When I am away from home and traveling, I stick to the places that sell the top tier stuff, or hit a Pilot, Flying J, etc.

Edited by mike5511

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...