Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey Guys!

Quick question for those that have tow bags/ know about them. Do they increase/decrease performance? Meaning, If I DO NOT tow, and just leave the bags deflated/at the 3lbs the manufacturer states, would I see a noticeable (better) difference moving back to the spring setup? Would it be worse?

 

I would love to hear some feedback. First time owning a truck that came with tow bags.

Posted
14 hours ago, Charles P. said:

Hey Guys!

Quick question for those that have tow bags/ know about them. Do they increase/decrease performance? Meaning, If I DO NOT tow, and just leave the bags deflated/at the 3lbs the manufacturer states, would I see a noticeable (better) difference moving back to the spring setup? Would it be worse?

 

I would love to hear some feedback. First time owning a truck that came with tow bags.

Hello Charles, I installed air bags on my 2018 1500.  The main reason I did it was for a more stable towing experience.  With my bags, the minimum is 5 psi so the majority of the time they are set to 5 psi.  They are minimally noticeable at this pressure.  I do think they would take away from articulation if you take your truck off-road.

Posted

I used a set of helper springs on a nissan titan 15 years ago or so (upside down I think as was the trend) - they essentially just clamped down all the leafs. Best bang for buck rear driving improvement I can recall for a pickup. Really cleaned up the hop...

Posted
1 hour ago, sharkeysierra said:

Tow bags are used for towing, leveling a truck when weight is applied for a safer ride. 
 

There is no performance loss/gain from leaving 3psi in the bags or having them at 100psi

I beg to differ on this- these bags at 10psi with no load in the back going down the highway? rough stuff.

Posted
11 hours ago, UnlimitedMatt said:

Hello Charles, I installed air bags on my 2018 1500.  The main reason I did it was for a more stable towing experience.  With my bags, the minimum is 5 psi so the majority of the time they are set to 5 psi.  They are minimally noticeable at this pressure.  I do think they would take away from articulation if you take your truck off-road.

Good to know. I'm not looking to do any crazy off roading soon for sure, but this is info I did not have.

Posted

Yeah, it was fine for me at 10psi rolling across bridges and construction in the road. 
 

I usually kept mine at 20-30 with no load, but I was also dropped so maybe that is what made my drive better. 
 

but there is no performance in tow bags.. my opinion

Posted
14 minutes ago, sharkeysierra said:

Yeah, it was fine for me at 10psi rolling across bridges and construction in the road. 
 

I usually kept mine at 20-30 with no load, but I was also dropped so maybe that is what made my drive better. 
 

but there is no performance in tow bags.. my opinion

Maybe im thinking about this wrong....do the tow bags replace springs that were in place on the axle? Or, was there simply nothing but a bump stop there before?

 

Now im wondering if this question even makes sense.

Posted

There is no coil springs in the rear of a truck. So yes, they sometimes replace the bump stop. Most times they mount to the axle and bolt to the frame. Sometimes they mount to the leaf springs and to the frame. 

The leaf springs stay in place. 
 

I believe most SUVs have coils and not leafs. I could be wrong though. 
 

 Tow bags only help the Extra weight of Truck bed or trailer. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, sharkeysierra said:

There is no coil springs in the rear of a truck. So yes, they sometimes replace the bump stop. Most times they mount to the axle and bolt to the frame. Sometimes they mount to the leaf springs and to the frame. 

The leaf springs stay in place. 
 

I believe most SUVs have coils and not leafs. I could be wrong though. 
 

 Tow bags only help the Extra weight of Truck bed or trailer. 

makes sense.

I had an avalanche previously (My only other "truck") and I know it was based on the tahoe/suburban/whatever suv it was platform. This is where my thought came about.

Posted

I let mine go down to a few pounds and with bilsteins in the back the ride is great. If pumped up to 10+ it rides rough for sure. The bags are not replacing any spring ...they are in addition to springs. add air when you need more spring like towing. I just add enough air to get back to same ride height when towing.

Posted
On 7/25/2020 at 11:35 PM, Pearl2017 said:

I let mine go down to a few pounds and with bilsteins in the back the ride is great. If pumped up to 10+ it rides rough for sure. The bags are not replacing any spring ...they are in addition to springs. add air when you need more spring like towing. I just add enough air to get back to same ride height when towing.

Thanks for the info. I swapped out to continental AT's and the ride is insanely different. I do still have the larger than normal bump going on in the rear. I am wondering if this is just normal truck bumps or more like...something is loose/ needing replacement? the truck was a towing machine before I got it, I am wondering if leaf springs/ Ubolts need to be checked? OR, if like I said, this is normal.

Posted

So our springs are designed for a 2k lb load in the bed. Then you add airbags on top of that.

 

the key to a nice ride with air bags.....reduce the spring rate of the leaf springs and then adjust the airbags to compensate for the weight.

Posted
2 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

So our springs are designed for a 2k lb load in the bed. Then you add airbags on top of that.

 

the key to a nice ride with air bags.....reduce the spring rate of the leaf springs and then adjust the airbags to compensate for the weight.

How do I go about reducing the spring rate??these bags are on the axle fyi, not on the springs. Just want to make sure that part is known since they have kits for both

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...