Jump to content

Paralysis by Analysis

howlinthndr
 Share

Recommended Posts

howlinthndr New Member

howlinthndr

Posted
Posted

New here and looking for some guidance.  I've been keeping up with the forum and really appreciate all the information everyone shares but I think I have information overload.

 

I just sold my 2014 ecoboost f150 with 68k miles after getting tired of repeated timing chain, IWE, and coolant leak issues. I am now looking for a Sierra that I can keep until it either becomes too troublesome or expensive to own any longer (hopefully 8+ years). Based on what I have read and watched, and my own experiences test driving vehicles the 6.2 and the 3.0 have the performance characteristics I am looking for.  After using the search function here and elsewhere I am aware of the seemingly few issues these engines are having (such as valve springs for recently built 6.2's, and DEF consumption and cooling fans for the 3.0).  Here's where I get stuck and I am hoping you all can provide some input:  I found two vehicles that fit my needs/wants, one with each engine.  I am concerned about the 6.2 because it was built in the timeframe related with the bad batch of valve springs and with the 3.0 being so new I'm leery of having gremlins start popping up after the first XX,000 miles (like with the ecoboost I just disposed of).

 

So, I guess my questions boils down to:  Would you let the valve spring TSB dissuade you from purchasing a 6.2? And, how much faith do you have in the 3.0 as far as long term durability?

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Roll of the dice. 

If you've been keeping up as you say your decision. 

btj_z71 Enthusiast

btj_z71

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, howlinthndr said:

New here and looking for some guidance.  I've been keeping up with the forum and really appreciate all the information everyone shares but I think I have information overload.

 

I just sold my 2014 ecoboost f150 with 68k miles after getting tired of repeated timing chain, IWE, and coolant leak issues. I am now looking for a Sierra that I can keep until it either becomes too troublesome or expensive to own any longer (hopefully 8+ years). Based on what I have read and watched, and my own experiences test driving vehicles the 6.2 and the 3.0 have the performance characteristics I am looking for.  After using the search function here and elsewhere I am aware of the seemingly few issues these engines are having (such as valve springs for recently built 6.2's, and DEF consumption and cooling fans for the 3.0).  Here's where I get stuck and I am hoping you all can provide some input:  I found two vehicles that fit my needs/wants, one with each engine.  I am concerned about the 6.2 because it was built in the timeframe related with the bad batch of valve springs and with the 3.0 being so new I'm leery of having gremlins start popping up after the first XX,000 miles (like with the ecoboost I just disposed of).

 

So, I guess my questions boils down to:  Would you let the valve spring TSB dissuade you from purchasing a 6.2? And, how much faith do you have in the 3.0 as far as long term durability?

Unless you are going to be towing heavy loads or looking for a fast truck, then go for the 3.0L Duramax.  I've got the 3.0L Duramax and it has amazing mpg, very quiet but still sounds like a diesel, and with the 10spd to compliment, it's amazing.  Really a superb powertrain.

  • Like 1
econometrics Senior Enthusiast

econometrics

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, howlinthndr said:

So, I guess my questions boils down to:  Would you let the valve spring TSB dissuade you from purchasing a 6.2? And, how much faith do you have in the 3.0 as far as long term durability?

6.2L is a very well-proven engine. I would not personally be too put off by the valve spring issue. 

 

The 3.0L is very new. If you're feeling uncertain coming off the issues you had with your F150, the 6.2L is the choice that will give you the most peace of mine for long-term reliability and ease of operation. 

  • Like 2
f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted

every truck has issues and some trucks are flawless . As they stated above its always a chance but don't let issues keep you from buying a truck for the most part a good percentages of them are good reliable trucks. Plus you always have warrant the first few years . 

jnissen Enthusiast

jnissen

Posted
Posted

The 6.2L is hard to beat since it’s been out there and a known entity. The 3.0L as you said is new. I have a 3.0L and really like it but I rolled the dice. I have no idea how it will do 100K miles from now.

Since you seem to be risk averse I’d go with the 6.2.

  • Like 1
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

The good thing is the 6.2 valve spring issue surfaces very early if it happens. On the 3.0, you’re looking at an uncertain future but years down the road. I think it’s going to be a solid engine but it may very well be the next 6.4 Powerstroke too. All clean sheet design modern diesels need to be viewed with scrutiny.

LowCountryDenali Enthusiast

LowCountryDenali

Posted
Posted

I have the 6.2 and it was a June 2020 build in Indiana.  Now at 4500 trouble free miles.  Excellent performance from this engine.  Just completed a 1100 mile roundtrip and averaged 18.3 mpg.  Wish it had a larger fuel tank!  

And I would have gone the 3.0 Duramax route had I been able to locate one with my required specs.  

Mandalorian Enthusiast

Mandalorian

Posted
Posted

IMO there's not really an advantage to a diesel in a half ton truck, unless you really want a diesel. The limiting factor for towing is the frame not the engine, unlike the gas vs diesel debate in an HD. You'll pay more in maintenance for the diesel, but won't see huge performance increases. 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Mandalorian said:

IMO there's not really an advantage to a diesel in a half ton truck, unless you really want a diesel. The limiting factor for towing is the frame not the engine, unlike the gas vs diesel debate in an HD. You'll pay more in maintenance for the diesel, but won't see huge performance increases. 

 

3.0 is cheaper to operate vs the 6.2 right now.  And its cheaper to buy as GM cut the option price by $1500.  Same for any existing trucks on the ground, they also got the price cut.  An oil change is about 20-25 more so assuming you follow GM's maint. schedule, that's $40-50 more for two oil changes a year @7500mi/oil change, 15,000/miles a year.  Then add 132/year for 3 tanks of DEF at 5000/mi per tank (I'm using GM's $22 for 2.5 gallon jug pricing).  You'd still end up ahead over the 6.2, even at the 5 year down the line timeframe.  

 

fueleconomy.thumb.png.df88ed04cdf31a5abd21882b63b50906.png  

 

 

pricing.thumb.png.7756d72d64e2050e4b8707fa837521b0.png

 

Edited by newdude
mdreynolds Enthusiast

mdreynolds

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, howlinthndr said:

New here and looking for some guidance.  I've been keeping up with the forum and really appreciate all the information everyone shares but I think I have information overload.

 

I just sold my 2014 ecoboost f150 with 68k miles after getting tired of repeated timing chain, IWE, and coolant leak issues. I am now looking for a Sierra that I can keep until it either becomes too troublesome or expensive to own any longer (hopefully 8+ years). Based on what I have read and watched, and my own experiences test driving vehicles the 6.2 and the 3.0 have the performance characteristics I am looking for.  After using the search function here and elsewhere I am aware of the seemingly few issues these engines are having (such as valve springs for recently built 6.2's, and DEF consumption and cooling fans for the 3.0).  Here's where I get stuck and I am hoping you all can provide some input:  I found two vehicles that fit my needs/wants, one with each engine.  I am concerned about the 6.2 because it was built in the timeframe related with the bad batch of valve springs and with the 3.0 being so new I'm leery of having gremlins start popping up after the first XX,000 miles (like with the ecoboost I just disposed of).

 

So, I guess my questions boils down to:  Would you let the valve spring TSB dissuade you from purchasing a 6.2? And, how much faith do you have in the 3.0 as far as long term durability?

I purchased a 2020 Sierra AT4 with the 6.2 the fell in the date range of the valve spring issue, I have 6K miles, and I drive it hard, no issues with the entire truck, the valve spring didn't affect a large percentage of the 6.2s produced from June 1, 2020 thru Sep 15, 2020, valve spring were manufactured by an outside vendor, the problem was identified and corrected, so purchasing any 2021s or really late 2020s produced after Sep 15, the issue has been rectified, you'll be good, some people think its a widespread issue, but only affected a small portion of the 6.2 produced during that period.

 

BTW I LOVE that engine, its badass and get decent MPGs if driven lightly, Im averaging 15.9 after 6K, that lots of idling, off roading and city driving, the best 50 mile trip was 23.5, best 400 17.6, again that 400 includes a lot of the mentioned conditions.

Edited by mdreynolds
Cpl_Punishment Senior Enthusiast

Cpl_Punishment

Posted
Posted

As others have said, I would lean towards the 6.2 as it's been around longer and it sounds like the fix for the valve springs is well understood. 3.0 is a brand new engine so who knows how it will hold up long term? 

blckblt Enthusiast

blckblt

Posted
Posted (edited)

I love my 6.2.  my best 25 is 28.1, best 50 is 25.6 and best 400 is 18ish ( I can verify if you want) and that is with the trailboss.

 

If my driving wasn’t mostly short trips I would probably get the 3.0.

 

 

Edited by blckblt
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, howlinthndr said:

  I found two vehicles that fit my needs/wants, one with each engine.  I am concerned about the 6.2 because it was built in the timeframe related with the bad batch of valve springs and with the 3.0 being so new I'm leery of having gremlins start popping up after the first XX,000 miles (like with the ecoboost I just disposed of).

 

So, I guess my questions boils down to:  Would you let the valve spring TSB dissuade you from purchasing a 6.2? And, how much faith do you have in the 3.0 as far as long term durability?

So the choice is one that is highly likely to fail and another that may fail? The only thing these two have in common performance wise is 460 pounds feet torque. I guess that mean torque, and lots of it, are important enough to risk for. 

 

You sure these are your only two choice.

Good Chance or Might? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It wouldn’t have happened if the government hadn’t mandated outrageous fuel mileage standards. It does very little for the consumer. It adds cost. Back during Covid there was a chip shortage. They gave a rebate for your truck if it didn’t have the chip to turn on cylinder deactivation. It was 50$ because at best you may see 1/2 a mile increase per gallon. Splitting hairs each fuel mileage trick wasn’t mandated. The government doesn’t do the engineering work and say use this until it’s already in use and they like it. The fuel mileage was mandated. And those add ons the results. There’s a mandate and they are the results.
    • newdude
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      It was never mandated.  Ever.    Automakers were incentivized to install it by getting CAFE credits to help with their vehicle fleet fuel economy scores.  They were being handed money/CAFE credits to install it.  Which is NOT a mandate.       The current admin removed the incentives that were behind them installing it.       
    • lanaderay
      5 Best Slide Down Gameplay Tips! 

      By lanaderay · Posted

      Are you playing Slide Down endlessly but your score is still low? Are you constantly crashing into obstacles as the game speed increases? Don't worry, this article will share 5 invaluable tips to help you master the race and impress your friends. Golden Rules 1. Look one step further. The mistake of 90% of new players is only staring at their character. The secret of experts is to look towards the top of the screen (where the slide is about to appear). This gives your brain an extra 0.5 - 1 second to process the situation and determine the direction of movement before the obstacle approaches. 2. Use gentle movements; don't swipe too hard. Slide Down is very sensitive. Moving your finger too forcefully or with excessive amplitude will cause your character to be thrown off course or crash into a wall. Practise moving your finger with small, decisive, and precise movements. 3. Don't be greedy for gold in dangerous locations. Gold coins are tempting for buying skins, but life is more important. If you see a gold coin right on the edge of a cliff or next to a spike trap, ignore it. Our goal is a High Score, and your score only increases if you survive. 4. Make the most of Power-ups. During the slide, you'll encounter items like Magnets (attract gold) or Shields (temporary invincibility). Never miss them! Especially the Shield, it's your "get out of jail free card" to help you get through those deadly fast sections. 5. Stay calm when speed peaks. When your score exceeds 500 or 1000, the game speed will be very fast. At this point, don't try to think logically; let your natural reflexes work. Take deep breaths and don't panic. Apply these 5 tips to your next game, and your leaderboard will surely improve dramatically. Good luck climbing the Slide Down leaderboard!
    • lingyuair
      Why I Recommend a Desiccant Air Dryer for Cleaner, Drier Compressed Air

      By lingyuair · Posted

      If you use compressed air regularly, one problem you cannot ignore is moisture. Water in the air line can cause rust, unstable air pressure, poor tool performance, and even damage to sensitive equipment. That is why I highly recommend using a desiccant air dryer. A desiccant air dryer is designed to remove moisture from compressed air by using drying materials such as activated alumina or molecular sieve. Compared with basic water separators, it can achieve much lower dew points, making it especially useful for applications that require dry and stable air. For workshops, painting systems, pneumatic tools, CNC machines, laser cutting equipment, and industrial production lines, a desiccant air dryer can make a big difference. It helps protect equipment, improve air quality, reduce maintenance costs, and extend the service life of the whole compressed air system. Another advantage is reliability. Many desiccant air dryers are built for continuous operation and can maintain stable drying performance even in demanding environments. For users who care about long-term efficiency and equipment protection, this is a smart investment. When choosing a desiccant air dryer, I suggest paying attention to air flow capacity, working pressure, dew point performance, regeneration method, and maintenance requirements. A good model should match your compressor system and actual air consumption. Overall, if moisture is causing problems in your compressed air system, a desiccant air dryer is definitely worth considering. It is practical, efficient, and highly useful for anyone who needs clean, dry, and reliable compressed air.
    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      My brand new 2007 Silverado's wax frame was rust from end to end partway through it's SECOND winter here in MA. That stuff is completely useless.    

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...