Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After deciding the 2017 Colorado wasn't going to be enough to safely pull the TT we purchased, it was traded in for this 2018 DC, Z71, 5.3L and 3.42 rear end.  The color choice was a compromise. All you married guys know about "compromise", right?  AKA "yes dear". 

This is it, plain Jane.  I added mud guards/flaps, spray in bed liner, Extang Encore Tonneau cover, running boards and towing mirrors.  It came with the factory break controller.

 

0L8jf8I.jpg

 

dHLKCYo.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

One year anniversary with it so decided to finally make a profile. Enjoyed looking at all these photos when making my decision on what to do with mine.

unnamed.thumb.jpg.eff2860ab7a0f97303478e67be48bfa4.jpgunnamed-1.thumb.jpg.1d3a14b8db758d493603595bb9015cbe.jpg

zone 2 inch leveling kit - nothing in the rear - 295/55R20 Cooper STT Pros with now 25,000 miles on them

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, sierra91 said:

One year anniversary with it so decided to finally make a profile. Enjoyed looking at all these photos when making my decision on what to do with mine.

unnamed.thumb.jpg.eff2860ab7a0f97303478e67be48bfa4.jpg

zone 2 inch leveling kit - nothing in the rear - 295/55R20 Cooper STT Pros with now 25,000 miles on them

What front bumper is that?  Good looking truck

Posted
1 hour ago, diegosaurus said:

What front bumper is that?  Good looking truck

Thanks. It is just the ranch hand. Was wanting one that could hold a winch but they were just all to big for a leveled truck.

Posted (edited)

Got this 2018 Silverado last week, it had 18,500 on the clock. Tailgate's been keyed already, drive out tags make it a target here. Got 100% of the dent and most of the scratch out. Little different than the 2010 Ranger I was in, it's like driving my den.

 

 

trucks new home 8 16 18.jpg

Edited by sheepdawg
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, DominatorZ71 said:

2016 Silverado LT Midnight Edition

Bought with 21k and loving everything about it.0ef87ee2b55e547af4bee4423928922c.jpg9178659204e575083edc7b95dca00365.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Congrats, looks awesome.....enjoy!

Posted

Just picked up my Denali and got a RC 7" lift with 22" Hostile Predators in asphalt with 35" Toyo RT open country tires. Flowmaster super 10 with turndown after the muffler, and 20%tint all around, think I'm done for now, time to enjoy 

20180822_195718.jpg

Posted

After doing speedy washes all summer, I was finally able to get a full detail in. Double bucket double pass hand wash, polished all the chrome, the wheels, and the exhaust tips, covered a few rock chips, and did a full interior detail. A two day chore, but it was worth it!

 

gcGQ6Tq.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

My 2014 GMC Denali 6.2. Bought it last spring with 14k miles on it. Put a RC 2” level kit on it. Plasti-dipped the wheels and emblems, K&N replacement filter. 

81FDD274-3B1A-42F8-B43A-43F4468820BB.jpeg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...