Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently became acknowledged about the myth of the 3,000 mile oil change on newer vehicles with advanced oil. I own a 2006 silverado 2500 v8 6L WT and I change my oil every 5k miles with Mobil synthetic 5w-30. I cannot seem to find the exact information within my car manual or my Haynes/Chilton manual for the recommended interval between oil changes. Is there anywhere I can look up how often I can change my oil with the specific engine of within my truck? I have heard some oils can go 10k+ miles on some vehicles. I'd love to do less oil changes, but don't want to endanger my engine since oil changes are so quick though I'd love to save money too! Where can I find this exact information or do you have any other suggestions? Thanks in advance!

Posted

If you want to know for sure, for the unique engine in your vehicle, the best way is an oil analysis. You take a sample and send it to a lab that runs tests, then returns all the info about the oil to you. There are a lot of different things you can see in a report, from water/fuel/insolubles in the oil, to flash point and additive content.

 

I send a sample each oil change to Blackstone Labs, and they have recommended a 10,000 mile oil change interval on my 5.3. I was changing my oil every 5,000 miles before, so even with the cost of the analysis I come out ahead since I end up doing half the maintenance of before, and I have the added benefit of keeping an eye on wear metals in my oil.

Posted

I'm not sure about your specific truck, but my '04 Sierra 3500 tracks how you drive [lots of stops/starts vs lots of highway driving, heavy acceleration, lots of idling, etc] to compute how much life the oil has left. Does your truck have that?

Posted

5,000 for conventional, 7,500 for synthetic blend and 10,000 for full synthetic.

 

This is for all city driving so you can technically go an extra 1-2,000 if you do a lot of interstate driving but I still go by those #s so it's no guess work or hoping. Of course this is on a vehicle that is driven daily or at least 2-3 times a week so it's used regularly. For something that's driven once a week or less then I say about 6 months personally no matter the miles.

Posted

The GM OLM lights up about 7500 miles for my 6.0l 2500...it's a non-contact instrument based completely on engine parameters, not oil chemistry. So GM must feel 7500 miles is safe and/or conservative for their purposes.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G730A using Tapatalk

Posted

 

I send a sample each oil change to Blackstone Labs, and they have recommended a 10,000 mile oil change interval on my 5.3. I was changing my oil every 5,000 miles before, so even with the cost of the analysis I come out ahead since I end up doing half the maintenance of before, and I have the added benefit of keeping an eye on wear metals in my oil.

Just out of curiosity, do they offer any guarantee for allowing you to go 10,000 miles in between oil changes? Being 10 years old I know your truck doesn't have any remaining GM warranty, but I wonder what would happen should you see a failure and it's linked to your oil change intervals. But then again, they are the professionals....

Posted

I go by the OLM when to change the oil always have since they started putting them in GM vehicles. I think doing a oil analysis is just way overboard and a waste of money. I would never go 10,000 miles on a oil change no matter what oil I had in there and what the oil analysis said. Just go by the OLM when it tells you to change it.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have yet to see an owners manual that didn't state the frequency of the vehicles oil change. It should be in yours. I know my 02 states to follow the OLM and if it doesn't indicate to change the oil in one year time frame then the oil should be changed. So double check your owners manual.

 

If you want to go extended oil change then accomplishing an oil analysis is the way to go with what ever brand of oil you choose to run. That will tell you just how long you can go with specific brand of oil.

Posted

Just out of curiosity, do they offer any guarantee for allowing you to go 10,000 miles in between oil changes? Being 10 years old I know your truck doesn't have any remaining GM warranty, but I wonder what would happen should you see a failure and it's linked to your oil change intervals. But then again, they are the professionals....

The oil analysis is a guarantee in itself, it makes it easy to keep track of what exactly is going on in the engine. My motor doesn't even use a quart of oil on a 10,000 mile interval, and I run a higher capacity filter, so it's not really all that extreme for synthetic oil. I have plenty of additive left and the oil still even looks clean.
Posted

I go about 8k miles on Mobil 1 in my Cruze, and the OLM usually is about 15 to 20 percent at that point

Posted (edited)

Just out of curiosity, do they offer any guarantee for allowing you to go 10,000 miles in between oil changes? Being 10 years old I know your truck doesn't have any remaining GM warranty, but I wonder what would happen should you see a failure and it's linked to your oil change intervals. But then again, they are the professionals....

 

 

It should really be no different than with the commercial heavy engines. For instance, Detroit Diesel recommends 15,000 miles / 300 hrs on their 12.7L Series 60. I use oil samples to determine that my comfort zone is at 25,000 / 500 hrs. I have a lengthy track record of samples on the motor. The OEM never had a problem with this. Once one digs down into the paperwork of lube manuals and such, one can usually find that an OEM will allow longer intervals, if backed up by oil analysis to prove the oil is still serviceable. And regarding the OLM thing, that is based on the lowest quality oil that barely comes in under the wire as meeting the approved specifications laid out by GM. If one is using a higher quality oil, like one of the name brand full synthetics, the OLM is just a novelty as far as determining if the oil should be changed. Clearly, any quality full synthetic is going to outperform the basic dexos1 minimum standard oil.

 

But, everyone has to live within their own comfort level. If one feels like changing oil at 2000 miles, who am I to give a rip? It is their vehicle. If it helps them to sleep better at night, far out. Changing oil "too soon" and used oil is not a waste. It is recycled or used for a myriad of other purposes. That is, unless the persons is just dumping it down the sewer drain. In which case, they should be shot. More people waste gobs of money on stupid stuff with no beneficial purpose than the cost of an oil change.

 

Oil analysis probably is a something that most folks do not need to do. It does provide some interesting information though, and can be used to head off a problem sometimes. I don't do regular oil samples on my pickup, but once in a while I do. I get my oil sample kits and analysis free from my oil supplier for my commercial stuff, so there is no cost for me to do them.

Edited by Cowpie
  • Like 1
Posted

Every 5000 KM (3100 miles) or so, full synthetic.

Sure more than I need to but my last truck had over 550,000km (342,000 miles) on it when I sold it and it never burnt a drop of oil.

If winter is coming I may change it early before the 5000km, if the temperature drops below 5C.

Posted

 

 

It should really be no different than with the commercial heavy engines. For instance, Detroit Diesel recommends 15,000 miles / 300 hrs on their 12.7L Series 60. I use oil samples to determine that my comfort zone is at 25,000 / 500 hrs. I have a lengthy track record of samples on the motor. The OEM never had a problem with this. Once one digs down into the paperwork of lube manuals and such, one can usually find that an OEM will allow longer intervals, if backed up by oil analysis to prove the oil is still serviceable. And regarding the OLM thing, that is based on the lowest quality oil that barely comes in under the wire as meeting the approved specifications laid out by GM. If one is using a higher quality oil, like one of the name brand full synthetics, the OLM is just a novelty as far as determining if the oil should be changed. Clearly, any quality full synthetic is going to outperform the basic dexos1 minimum standard oil.

 

But, everyone has to live within their own comfort level. If one feels like changing oil at 2000 miles, who am I to give a rip? It is their vehicle. If it helps them to sleep better at night, far out. Changing oil "too soon" and used oil is not a waste. It is recycled or used for a myriad of other purposes. That is, unless the persons is just dumping it down the sewer drain. In which case, they should be shot. More people waste gobs of money on stupid stuff with no beneficial purpose than the cost of an oil change.

 

Oil analysis probably is a something that most folks do not need to do. It does provide some interesting information though, and can be used to head off a problem sometimes. I don't do regular oil samples on my pickup, but once in a while I do. I get my oil sample kits and analysis free from my oil supplier for my commercial stuff, so there is no cost for me to do them.

After running and analyzing a modern oil and a quality synthetic in the same engine, I see no reason to say a synthetic is significantly better than a good conventional in this day and age. Maybe in the 70s when synthetics first hit the market, but oil quality has came leaps an bounds since then...I analyzed conventional oil at nearly 45k miles, and it was still suitable for use.

 

And my comment on the OLM was more to the point that the OLM is conservative, even compared to a conventional oil use. Running modern oil to 7k miles isn't stressing it much.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

That is getting pretty much true. Conventional oils have come long way. And a lot has to do with the additive package as part of what a motor oil is. People tend to waste a lot of time worrying about the base oil being a conventional, Grp III synthetic, Grp IV synthetic, etc and really don't take the time to look at how the additive package in the oil is. Since the add pack makes up to around 20% of what a motor oil is, yes, it can make a huge difference in the oil performance. Base oil is clear. The color one sees in a quart of motor oil is from the additive package.

 

Now we have oil being made from natural gas to add even more to the game. Actually, it is been done for a long time, it is just that now Pennzoil has taken it to a major level in that just about all of their top line stuff, the base oil is made from natural gas. Group IV PAO synthetics are also made from natural gas. Many folks don't know that. Actually, it is made primarily from ethylene gas, which is derived from natural gas. Group III synthetic is severely refined crude, a major step above regular conventional base oil.

 

But in a nutshell, they all come from earth derived carbon chain sources. Cook it up right, blend in a great additive package, and you have a quality oil. I actually prefer a Group III and Group IV synthetic combination. Both of those groups bring something special to the game and a blend of them along with a great add pack is the cat's meow, for sure.

Edited by Cowpie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If we're talking futures, yes, it's speculation.   The spot price of a delivered barrel is elevated now compared to before the conflict. And that is related more to current supply/demand.
    • SPECULATION on the wars effect raised prices. AI is maximizing the profit. Refining is vertically integrated. 
    • It's the Middle East conflict that raised prices, not AI. But nice distraction.
    • Lauren Fix Is AI quietly deciding what you pay at the gas pump? How the algorithm picks drivers' pockets.   Every time tensions flare somewhere in the world, gasoline prices seem to jump overnight. Drivers expect it. The news blames geopolitics, oil traders blame uncertainty, and politicians blame each other. But here's the question almost nobody is asking: If computers can raise prices within hours, why do they suddenly become so patient when it's time to lower them? Americans have lived with this frustration for decades. The price of crude oil climbs, and gas stations respond almost immediately. Crude oil falls sharply, and suddenly we're told to be patient. Refiners need time. Distributors need time. Retailers need time. Somehow, that urgency only seems to work in one direction. Regulators have already gone after algorithmic pricing in apartment rentals, and they're looking at hotel rooms, airline tickets, and online retail. Now a new California lawsuit and a federal push to investigate gasoline pricing suggest there may be another piece of the story that deserves far more attention. It isn't simply about oil markets anymore. It's about artificial intelligence, algorithms, and whether software designed to maximize profits is quietly changing how fuel prices are set across America.   If that sounds like something out of a science fiction movie, think again. Kalibrating the market? Kalibrate is a real pricing platform. The company markets its software as an advanced pricing solution that analyzes competitor prices, wholesale costs, local demand, traffic patterns, and countless other variables before recommending the "optimal" price at the pump. By the company's own marketing, it serves many of America's largest fuel retailers and convenience store chains. Retailers use it because it promises to increase profit margins while staying competitive. There is nothing inherently illegal about any of this. Every major industry now runs on data analytics. The concern begins when pricing software stops simply reacting to the market and starts shaping it. On June 22, three California drivers filed a federal class-action lawsuit in Sacramento — and they didn't just sue the software company. They sued the gas stations. Kalibrate is the lead defendant, but so are Marathon, BP, Circle K, 7-Eleven, Speedway, Walmart, Sam's Club, and Albertsons. According to the complaint, Marathon alone runs more than 1,000 ARCO stations in California and has been letting Kalibrate set prices at them since 2020. Circle K, plaintiffs claim, has more than 400 stations on the software. Albertsons, they allege, has been using it since at least 2009. The complaint alleges that Kalibrate allowed competing retailers to share competitively sensitive information and receive pricing recommendations that discouraged aggressive competition. It describes a "restoration" feature that plaintiffs say lets nearly all the stations in a market raise prices at the same time. It also quotes Kalibrate's marketing, which according to the complaint tells operators that even in the face of "falling oil prices ... it's critical to avoid a race to the bottom," and warns that cutting your price to win customers "could be making a change that triggers a downward spiral." The plaintiffs call the platform the "central nervous system for a conspiracy to extinguish retail price competition among gas stations." Price pumping What does that cost you? Research cited in the complaint found that stations switching to this kind of software raise prices by about 6 cents a gallon on average — and by as much as 30 cents where most of the stations in an area are running it. Plaintiffs point to a real-world example too: They allege that when one California Albertsons turned Kalibrate on, its pump price climbed 3 to 4 cents within days. That sounds small. It isn't. By the complaint's math, a single penny on the statewide average drains $134 million a year from California drivers' wallets. Kalibrate says it disagrees with the allegations, calls its technology lawful, and intends to defend itself. The retail chains have not yet answered the complaint. No court has ruled on any of it. But what happens when thousands of competing businesses begin relying on the same algorithm to determine prices? Price fixing has been illegal in California for more than a century, and the plaintiffs are suing under that old law. What's new is a statute that took effect on January 1 — AB 325, the Preventing Algorithmic Collusion Act — which says plainly that you cannot escape a price-fixing charge by routing the conspiracy through software. Using pricing software is still perfectly legal, but using it to coordinate with your competitors is not. AB 325 makes it unlawful to use or distribute a "common pricing algorithm" — software that uses competitor data to recommend, align, or stabilize prices — as part of an agreement to restrain trade. Whatever you think of Sacramento, it closed that loophole first, and this case is the first real test of it. The A-word Washington is applying pressure of its own — though it is worth being precise about what kind. On July 3, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission sent every state attorney general a letter urging them to investigate whether antitrust violations or price gouging are keeping gas prices artificially high. "Recent volatility in crude oil prices does not suspend either the antitrust laws or state consumer protection laws," they wrote, "and it does not authorize companies to manipulate retail prices or collude with their competitors." The letter followed President Trump's complaint, posted to Truth Social on June 23, that falling crude prices weren't reaching drivers. But read that letter closely and you'll notice something. It never mentions algorithms. Not once. The federal government is going after gas prices with the same tools it has always used, while the argument about the software is being made by three drivers and their lawyers in a Sacramento courtroom. Nobody in Washington has said the word yet. And whether any of these investigations turns up illegal conduct remains to be seen. Anyone who has driven for more than a few years knows the pattern. Prices spike within days of a geopolitical event, then drift down at a painfully slow pace. Economists even have a name for it: the "rockets and feathers" effect, and they have studied it for decades. Researchers point to several reasons, including inventory replacement costs, consumer behavior, and local competition. None of those explanations necessarily involve illegal activity.   Dirty work   But artificial intelligence introduces an entirely new variable. Unlike traditional pricing models, today's software can monitor competitors continuously, process enormous amounts of market data instantly, and recommend price changes faster than any human pricing manager ever could. If dozens or even hundreds of competing retailers rely on similar recommendations generated from comparable market data, the practical result may be less price competition — without anyone ever picking up the phone to coordinate prices. That possibility isn't unique to gasoline. Regulators have already gone after algorithmic pricing in apartment rentals, and they're looking at hotel rooms, airline tickets, and online retail. The Justice Department sued RealPage over the software landlords used to set rents and settled the case last November. The concern in every case is the same: that algorithms may accomplish indirectly what competitors have long been prohibited from doing directly. It's worth being precise about what that settlement did and didn't say. RealPage paid no penalty, and the government made no finding that it broke the law. What the DOJ objected to was the use of nonpublic information from competing landlords — not the software itself. Using an algorithm to price your product isn't illegal. Feeding it your competitors' private numbers is where the trouble starts. That distinction is going to decide the gas station case too. Technology moves faster than regulation. Thin margins This debate also exposes another misconception. When Americans get angry about gas prices, they aim that anger at the oil companies. In reality, what you pay at the pump includes crude oil costs, refining expenses, transportation, taxes, distribution, and retail pricing. Gas stations generally operate on thin per-gallon margins — the National Association of Convenience Stores puts the net at roughly a dime a gallon once credit card fees and operating costs come out — while state taxes and regulatory costs can dramatically affect what you pay locally, particularly in a state like California. If gasoline prices are rising because of global supply disruptions, consumers may not like it, but they can understand it. Markets move. Wars affect energy. Hurricanes interrupt refining. But if pricing software is reducing competition by encouraging retailers to move together instead of competing aggressively for customers, consumers deserve answers. Artificial intelligence is quietly becoming the invisible middleman in countless financial decisions Americans make every day — insurance rates, airline tickets, hotel rooms, online prices, and now what you pay every time you pull up to the pump. Most consumers never know an algorithm was involved; they simply assume that's what the market decided. Algorithms don't care whether you're commuting to work, driving your kids to school, or trying to keep your small business afloat. They don't understand household budgets or family vacations. They optimize. That's what they were built to do. The question was never whether artificial intelligence can set prices more efficiently. It's whether we've quietly allowed machines to redefine what competition means. Because if software can determine the price of something as essential as gasoline today, what will it be deciding tomorrow?   https://www.theblaze.com/lifestyle/is-ai-quietly-deciding-what-you-pay-at-the-gas-pump  
    • All valid.   But.  How many people really do this?  Its few and far between.  Most just drop it into D and go.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...