Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Supplier makes them the way GM tells them to.

 

Anything else is just marketing/sales 'spin'.

 

Just sayin'....

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1
Posted

Overall the bucket seats are narrow, the heated & cooled part is only the center, only the center is real leather, and the inner electrics are known for failure. As I said before - each newer year (generation) seems lees comfortable (to me)

 

If I were in charge ... for the $50,000 +- I'd make sure the drivers seat was very nice, a draw to bring happy former drivers to become new buyers

 

100% of the trucks use is driving in the drivers seat - DUH

  • Like 1
  • 10 months later...
Posted

I have a 2016 extended cab LT. The seats are horrible. The bottom of the seat is bad. The back of the seat is crap. The headrest angle isn't adjustable. The seat belt only retracts in one place, compared to my 2000 that would retract on top and bottom. The front of the seat digs into the back of my legs. I also get back pain. A drive any further than 2 hours is torture. 

 

It just amazes me that pretty much everything about my 2000 Z71 LT was better in every way compared to the 2016. How did we take this many steps back? I should have kept the old truck. I wanted something newer and reliable. I actually went to a dealer to sit in different pickups to see if seats in other models were any different. I have the 40/60 or whatever it's called with the fold down middle seat. Even the trucks with the middle console are awful. If I can't figure out how to retrofit some old 2000 Silverado seats I may start shopping for an F-150. 

Posted

They must’ve changed this in 2017, cause I can lower the front of my seat till it feels like I’m going to slide off and I’m 140lbs. Some of the adjustments work in tandem to achieve a desired position. 

Posted
11 hours ago, rudyb said:

I have a 2016 extended cab LT. The seats are horrible. The bottom of the seat is bad. The back of the seat is crap. The headrest angle isn't adjustable. The seat belt only retracts in one place, compared to my 2000 that would retract on top and bottom. The front of the seat digs into the back of my legs. I also get back pain. A drive any further than 2 hours is torture. 

 

It just amazes me that pretty much everything about my 2000 Z71 LT was better in every way compared to the 2016. How did we take this many steps back? I should have kept the old truck. I wanted something newer and reliable. I actually went to a dealer to sit in different pickups to see if seats in other models were any different. I have the 40/60 or whatever it's called with the fold down middle seat. Even the trucks with the middle console are awful. If I can't figure out how to retrofit some old 2000 Silverado seats I may start shopping for an F-150. 

You may want to have this checked out at your dealer.  I also owned a 2000 (and a 2009) but I don't believe comfort has declined.  Fireblade74 commented on the adjustment.   This may be your issue.  

  • 4 months later...
Posted

Does anyone know if GM as stated in this topic went with Lear or other different seat manufacturer for the 2019 I have been holding off trading my uncomfortable high country because i want to stay with GM but if it ts going to have the same POS seats mine have im going to look at other brands 

Posted

I really like the bucket seats in my 15 SLT.  I still have my 2000 SLT with bucket seats as well.  Those seats are also great, but I actually prefer the 15 seats for long distance.  I'm 6'-2" 225 pounds so maybe that has something to do with it.  I also really like the seat in my 2000 Camaro SS.  Everybody seemed to complain about those, but not me.

Posted
On 9/23/2016 at 7:47 AM, Silvern Sentry said:

Well they are changing seat manufacturer in 2018 so it appears even GM is not satisfied with the seats.

http://thenewswheel.com/next-gen-silverado-sierra-will-have-better-seats-thanks-to-better-supplier-contracts/

 

Lets just hope they have the good sense to add rear seat vent too.

GM said this same thing when transitioning from GMT900 to K2XX generation in 2013 / 2014

Posted

I think the cloth seats are great in my 2016 LT... I have full power plus heated.... I had a Colorado, those seats were awful... I also really like the seats in my wife's 2016 Malibu... I drive around for a living as a sales rep and some days I am in the truck for 8 hours and I have no issues...

Posted

I almost got rid of my '16 after the first few months. The seats were hard and horrible. There is a horizontal bar running (3" or so up from the seat) in the seat back that is a real bitch. I had a sore lower back most of that time (and I never get a sore back). I even watched YouTube videos on how to properly adjust the seat. Compared to my '09, the newer seats suck. They still do in my truck, but they are more comfortable now after 65,000km.

  • 10 months later...
Posted (edited)

Purchased a new 2019 Chevy Traverse, leather, and after a month, I'm ready to get rid of it. Kills my back. I turned in a GMC Acadia for that same reason. GM needs to fix their seats. I have never had issues with my Dodge or Ford. I've tried everything too. My wife doesn't have issues so, it's hers now. Im scared to even ride in the passenger seat. Horrible

 

Edited by Jeff Gates
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 2/13/2019 at 3:54 PM, Jeff Gates said:

Purchased a new 2019 Chevy Traverse, leather, and after a month, I'm ready to get rid of it. Kills my back. I turned in a GMC Acadia for that same reason. GM needs to fix their seats. I have never had issues with my Dodge or Ford. I've tried everything too. My wife doesn't have issues so, it's hers now. Im scared to even ride in the passenger seat. Horrible

 

Me too.  I find most vehicles today are made for short/small drivers.  The seats adjustment isn't enough to offset the hardness in seat.  I find nerve pain when driving distance of an hour.  My 2010 w/leather was better than the Denali seats I have now.  Not sure where to turn because it feels like industry is going the way of airlines, as if I care who is in the truck with me.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

Bringing this back from the dead.  I'm in a 2015 SLT, I've recently noticed the bottom of the seat has a hump in it as best I can describe the feeling, no not lumbar support, the seat itself where you place your buns has a hump.  It's toward the rear bottom, feels like there's a peak dead center just before the bottom meets the seat back.  They are heated/cooled seats, I get in them a lot pretty damp from the river.  Not sure if water/moisture would cause something under there to warp or dis-form, but it's pretty damn uncomfortable.  Never had this issue until maybe a month ago, I'm the only owner of the vehicle.  Thought about adding a gel pad, would this mute the heated/vented option?  Would heat melt the gel?  Is there a fix I've overlooked somewhere?

 

Edit, I'm 5'8 165lb for reference.  

Edited by Skeeter McSkeet
Posted

Average-ish guy here...5’10” and 170.  Seats are fine to me...for the first 4 hours.  I start getting a serious case of butt rot after that.  Back support is good though.  Seats in friend’s F-150 are definitely better on long drives.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

My husband purchased a 2018 GMC Denali 3500 and we took a trip less than an hour away and my lower back and hips hurt. We then went to the keys a 12 hour drive and I was hurting for 2 days I am 5’1  ft and about 140  and I refuse to get in that truck again I have actually followed him in out 2002 GMC Sierra we have a 08 3500 and it’s comfortable we also have a 2007 2500 single cab work truck And  I would ride In that over his new $70K truck utnis putting a strain on our marriage as he is proud of his new truck and gets embarrassed when his wife of 12 years follows him in an older truck! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...