Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Supplier makes them the way GM tells them to.

 

Anything else is just marketing/sales 'spin'.

 

Just sayin'....

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1
Posted

Overall the bucket seats are narrow, the heated & cooled part is only the center, only the center is real leather, and the inner electrics are known for failure. As I said before - each newer year (generation) seems lees comfortable (to me)

 

If I were in charge ... for the $50,000 +- I'd make sure the drivers seat was very nice, a draw to bring happy former drivers to become new buyers

 

100% of the trucks use is driving in the drivers seat - DUH

  • Like 1
  • 10 months later...
Posted

I have a 2016 extended cab LT. The seats are horrible. The bottom of the seat is bad. The back of the seat is crap. The headrest angle isn't adjustable. The seat belt only retracts in one place, compared to my 2000 that would retract on top and bottom. The front of the seat digs into the back of my legs. I also get back pain. A drive any further than 2 hours is torture. 

 

It just amazes me that pretty much everything about my 2000 Z71 LT was better in every way compared to the 2016. How did we take this many steps back? I should have kept the old truck. I wanted something newer and reliable. I actually went to a dealer to sit in different pickups to see if seats in other models were any different. I have the 40/60 or whatever it's called with the fold down middle seat. Even the trucks with the middle console are awful. If I can't figure out how to retrofit some old 2000 Silverado seats I may start shopping for an F-150. 

Posted

They must’ve changed this in 2017, cause I can lower the front of my seat till it feels like I’m going to slide off and I’m 140lbs. Some of the adjustments work in tandem to achieve a desired position. 

Posted
11 hours ago, rudyb said:

I have a 2016 extended cab LT. The seats are horrible. The bottom of the seat is bad. The back of the seat is crap. The headrest angle isn't adjustable. The seat belt only retracts in one place, compared to my 2000 that would retract on top and bottom. The front of the seat digs into the back of my legs. I also get back pain. A drive any further than 2 hours is torture. 

 

It just amazes me that pretty much everything about my 2000 Z71 LT was better in every way compared to the 2016. How did we take this many steps back? I should have kept the old truck. I wanted something newer and reliable. I actually went to a dealer to sit in different pickups to see if seats in other models were any different. I have the 40/60 or whatever it's called with the fold down middle seat. Even the trucks with the middle console are awful. If I can't figure out how to retrofit some old 2000 Silverado seats I may start shopping for an F-150. 

You may want to have this checked out at your dealer.  I also owned a 2000 (and a 2009) but I don't believe comfort has declined.  Fireblade74 commented on the adjustment.   This may be your issue.  

  • 4 months later...
Posted

Does anyone know if GM as stated in this topic went with Lear or other different seat manufacturer for the 2019 I have been holding off trading my uncomfortable high country because i want to stay with GM but if it ts going to have the same POS seats mine have im going to look at other brands 

Posted

I really like the bucket seats in my 15 SLT.  I still have my 2000 SLT with bucket seats as well.  Those seats are also great, but I actually prefer the 15 seats for long distance.  I'm 6'-2" 225 pounds so maybe that has something to do with it.  I also really like the seat in my 2000 Camaro SS.  Everybody seemed to complain about those, but not me.

Posted
On 9/23/2016 at 7:47 AM, Silvern Sentry said:

Well they are changing seat manufacturer in 2018 so it appears even GM is not satisfied with the seats.

http://thenewswheel.com/next-gen-silverado-sierra-will-have-better-seats-thanks-to-better-supplier-contracts/

 

Lets just hope they have the good sense to add rear seat vent too.

GM said this same thing when transitioning from GMT900 to K2XX generation in 2013 / 2014

Posted

I think the cloth seats are great in my 2016 LT... I have full power plus heated.... I had a Colorado, those seats were awful... I also really like the seats in my wife's 2016 Malibu... I drive around for a living as a sales rep and some days I am in the truck for 8 hours and I have no issues...

Posted

I almost got rid of my '16 after the first few months. The seats were hard and horrible. There is a horizontal bar running (3" or so up from the seat) in the seat back that is a real bitch. I had a sore lower back most of that time (and I never get a sore back). I even watched YouTube videos on how to properly adjust the seat. Compared to my '09, the newer seats suck. They still do in my truck, but they are more comfortable now after 65,000km.

  • 10 months later...
Posted (edited)

Purchased a new 2019 Chevy Traverse, leather, and after a month, I'm ready to get rid of it. Kills my back. I turned in a GMC Acadia for that same reason. GM needs to fix their seats. I have never had issues with my Dodge or Ford. I've tried everything too. My wife doesn't have issues so, it's hers now. Im scared to even ride in the passenger seat. Horrible

 

Edited by Jeff Gates
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 2/13/2019 at 3:54 PM, Jeff Gates said:

Purchased a new 2019 Chevy Traverse, leather, and after a month, I'm ready to get rid of it. Kills my back. I turned in a GMC Acadia for that same reason. GM needs to fix their seats. I have never had issues with my Dodge or Ford. I've tried everything too. My wife doesn't have issues so, it's hers now. Im scared to even ride in the passenger seat. Horrible

 

Me too.  I find most vehicles today are made for short/small drivers.  The seats adjustment isn't enough to offset the hardness in seat.  I find nerve pain when driving distance of an hour.  My 2010 w/leather was better than the Denali seats I have now.  Not sure where to turn because it feels like industry is going the way of airlines, as if I care who is in the truck with me.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

Bringing this back from the dead.  I'm in a 2015 SLT, I've recently noticed the bottom of the seat has a hump in it as best I can describe the feeling, no not lumbar support, the seat itself where you place your buns has a hump.  It's toward the rear bottom, feels like there's a peak dead center just before the bottom meets the seat back.  They are heated/cooled seats, I get in them a lot pretty damp from the river.  Not sure if water/moisture would cause something under there to warp or dis-form, but it's pretty damn uncomfortable.  Never had this issue until maybe a month ago, I'm the only owner of the vehicle.  Thought about adding a gel pad, would this mute the heated/vented option?  Would heat melt the gel?  Is there a fix I've overlooked somewhere?

 

Edit, I'm 5'8 165lb for reference.  

Edited by Skeeter McSkeet
Posted

Average-ish guy here...5’10” and 170.  Seats are fine to me...for the first 4 hours.  I start getting a serious case of butt rot after that.  Back support is good though.  Seats in friend’s F-150 are definitely better on long drives.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

My husband purchased a 2018 GMC Denali 3500 and we took a trip less than an hour away and my lower back and hips hurt. We then went to the keys a 12 hour drive and I was hurting for 2 days I am 5’1  ft and about 140  and I refuse to get in that truck again I have actually followed him in out 2002 GMC Sierra we have a 08 3500 and it’s comfortable we also have a 2007 2500 single cab work truck And  I would ride In that over his new $70K truck utnis putting a strain on our marriage as he is proud of his new truck and gets embarrassed when his wife of 12 years follows him in an older truck! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
    • Hello from Australia Just sharing that there is now a way to delete the active shutters entirely with just a plug in module. Opens up tons of room to light bars etc.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...