Jump to content

Leveling with Coilovers & Upper Control Arms

sethwick75

By sethwick75
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

sethwick75 Enthusiast

sethwick75

Posted
Posted

I just bought a 2014 Silverado 1500 Z71 Crew Cab and I'm loving it. I want to level out the front end, to fit a little larger tire and make it look right, but I don't want to go with a spacer kit. Looking to improve the suspension travel and overall ride both on & off road, so I was thinking of going with an adjustable coilover (ie: Fox, Fabtech, King) to get 2"-2.5" of lift, plus add new uniball upper control arms.

 

Has anyone gone with route, without going up to 4" plus of lift? I don't want to add that much lift, but want to improve ride. The road live out is a single lane, private road and has a bunch of speed bumps. I want to be able to cruise right over them (at around 10-15 mph is all) without having to slow down, hence the set up I'm considering.

 

I used to have an '11 F-150 FX4 with Bilstein 5100's, but I felt like it didn't improve the ride when put under even mild wheel travel situations. Hoping others can vouch for a better experience going with a coilover system.

 

sethwick75 Enthusiast

sethwick75

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Side Note: Fabtech makes a complete kit that includes 2.5" Front Coilovers, Uniball Upper Control Arms, and Rear Shocks for around $2,400. I know it is WAY more expensive than a spacer kit, but I'm looking to gain significant improvements to the suspension, not just a cosmetic leveling.

Kyleorsini Enthusiast

Kyleorsini

Posted
Posted

you could add icon vehicle dynamics. they have a cople stage options for what you want.

 

theres also the bilstein 6112 that should be out hopefully soon. it is a coilover. you then would have to source out a UCA from another company.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

Lots of people have installed the Icon coil over kit, the fox 2.0 & 2.5 coilovers and the King 2.5 coilovers. Set under 3" lift. I'm on my mobile so I can not give you links but search for

"icon"

"King" or

"Fox"

on this forum and you will see lots of posts about them.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

Kings:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/161238-king-coilover-shocks-installed/page-1

 

Fox 2.5:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/190663-fox-25-cognito-results/?fromsearch=1

 

Fox 2.0:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/181878-fox-20-coilovers-answer-from-fox/?fromsearch=1

My neighbor has the fabtech kit on his 6.2 NFC and likes it. As he has been going out on the trails more this last season he is going to be upgrading from the fabtech to the King 2.5's front and rear and then camburg A arm. I plan on doing the same swapping from my bilstein 5100 adjustables to kings and camburg a arms.

 

All of the coil overs are going to ride better then a spacer level lift & as a bonus you can adjust ride height. The basic 2.0's will soak up less then say the 2.5 or 3.0 body shocks.

Crafty34 Enthusiast

Crafty34

Posted
Posted

I currently have the Rancho Quicklift which is ok for looks but crappy ride quality. I just pulled the trigger on the Kings and Cognito UCA's. I should be getting them installed the 1st week of December. I had the Icons on my 13 F150 and they rode pretty nice. I chose the Kings because I read that they will ride a little better than the Icons.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BIGRED811 Enthusiast

BIGRED811

Posted
Posted

Anyone used the customized King coilovers from Mazzulla Offroad? They have some incredible looking upper control arms.

 

http://mzoffroad.com/chevy-4wd-mid-travel-coilovers-14-15.html

 

http://mzoffroad.com/14-15-chevy-1500-uniball-upper-control-arms.html

 

This combo looks really nice. Expensive, but appears bullet-proof.

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

sethwick75 Enthusiast

sethwick75

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

 

 

Thanks for the input. I'm new to all of this. I had an F-150 with Bilsteins on it, but before that truck my previous lifted truck was my '72 Chevy single cab, std bed with an 8" on 35's. Suspension has changed dramatically since I owned that truck. Unfortunately I sold that truck. Never should have! Still have a '72 Blazer, but with only a 2" spring lift.

tyrich88 Enthusiast

tyrich88

Posted
Posted

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

Good info! I am looking into replacing my shocks eventually as well and seeing as this is my daily driver, the icons sound way better for my usage.

ChevyRoofer Senior Enthusiast

ChevyRoofer

Posted
Posted

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

 

Good info, I've heard the exact same thing.

 

$2800 for the King/Mazzulla setup is pretty steep for not off roading every week haha.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

Anyone priced out an Icon set up?

The Icon stage 1 kit with 2.0 shocks starts @ $1,800.00 with no upper control arm & prices go all the way up to $4,147 for the complete stage 5 kit which has larger 2.5 shocks with remote reservoirs.

All of the Icon kits I am referring to are for 1-3" of lift.

 

http://iconvehicledynamics.com/shop/455-complete-suspension-systems

ChevyRoofer Senior Enthusiast

ChevyRoofer

Posted
Posted

Anyone priced out an Icon set up?

 

The Icon stage 1 kit with 2.0 shocks starts @ $1,800.00 with no upper control arm & prices go all the way up to $4,147 for the complete stage 5 kit which has larger 2.5 shocks with remote reservoirs.

All of the Icon kits I am referring to are for 1-3" of lift.

 

http://iconvehicledynamics.com/shop/455-complete-suspension-systems

 

Looks to be $ 2800 as well for the same style kit. Same price as the Mazzulla and King kit. If they were the same price, I'd def go Mazzulla/King.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

 

 

Looks to be $ 2800 as well for the same style kit. Same price as the Mazzulla and King kit. If they were the same price, I'd def go Mazzulla/King.

Yes but the basic Mazzulla kit does not include the rear shocks which are an extra $783.00

so the Mazzulla kit with King coil overs $1,799 + rear king shocks $783. + control arms $1,000 = $3,580.00

 

If you do not need 2.5 shocks with reservoirs you can get a complete 2.0 kit from icon for $2,813

 

I still think the King set up would be better but that depends on how thick your wallet is :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • davester
      Needing this part.

      By davester · Posted

      hit a junkyard.
    • Z45
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Z45 · Posted

      Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • B07
      Needing this part.

      By B07 · Posted

      Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
    • rav3
      2017 Silverado Front Bumper Valence/license plate holder

      By rav3 · Posted

      https://ebay.io/m/cTI46i

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...