Jump to content

Leveling with Coilovers & Upper Control Arms

sethwick75

By sethwick75
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

sethwick75 Enthusiast

sethwick75

Posted
Posted

I just bought a 2014 Silverado 1500 Z71 Crew Cab and I'm loving it. I want to level out the front end, to fit a little larger tire and make it look right, but I don't want to go with a spacer kit. Looking to improve the suspension travel and overall ride both on & off road, so I was thinking of going with an adjustable coilover (ie: Fox, Fabtech, King) to get 2"-2.5" of lift, plus add new uniball upper control arms.

 

Has anyone gone with route, without going up to 4" plus of lift? I don't want to add that much lift, but want to improve ride. The road live out is a single lane, private road and has a bunch of speed bumps. I want to be able to cruise right over them (at around 10-15 mph is all) without having to slow down, hence the set up I'm considering.

 

I used to have an '11 F-150 FX4 with Bilstein 5100's, but I felt like it didn't improve the ride when put under even mild wheel travel situations. Hoping others can vouch for a better experience going with a coilover system.

 

sethwick75 Enthusiast

sethwick75

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Side Note: Fabtech makes a complete kit that includes 2.5" Front Coilovers, Uniball Upper Control Arms, and Rear Shocks for around $2,400. I know it is WAY more expensive than a spacer kit, but I'm looking to gain significant improvements to the suspension, not just a cosmetic leveling.

Kyleorsini Enthusiast

Kyleorsini

Posted
Posted

you could add icon vehicle dynamics. they have a cople stage options for what you want.

 

theres also the bilstein 6112 that should be out hopefully soon. it is a coilover. you then would have to source out a UCA from another company.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

Lots of people have installed the Icon coil over kit, the fox 2.0 & 2.5 coilovers and the King 2.5 coilovers. Set under 3" lift. I'm on my mobile so I can not give you links but search for

"icon"

"King" or

"Fox"

on this forum and you will see lots of posts about them.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

Kings:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/161238-king-coilover-shocks-installed/page-1

 

Fox 2.5:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/190663-fox-25-cognito-results/?fromsearch=1

 

Fox 2.0:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/181878-fox-20-coilovers-answer-from-fox/?fromsearch=1

My neighbor has the fabtech kit on his 6.2 NFC and likes it. As he has been going out on the trails more this last season he is going to be upgrading from the fabtech to the King 2.5's front and rear and then camburg A arm. I plan on doing the same swapping from my bilstein 5100 adjustables to kings and camburg a arms.

 

All of the coil overs are going to ride better then a spacer level lift & as a bonus you can adjust ride height. The basic 2.0's will soak up less then say the 2.5 or 3.0 body shocks.

Crafty34 Enthusiast

Crafty34

Posted
Posted

I currently have the Rancho Quicklift which is ok for looks but crappy ride quality. I just pulled the trigger on the Kings and Cognito UCA's. I should be getting them installed the 1st week of December. I had the Icons on my 13 F150 and they rode pretty nice. I chose the Kings because I read that they will ride a little better than the Icons.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BIGRED811 Enthusiast

BIGRED811

Posted
Posted

Anyone used the customized King coilovers from Mazzulla Offroad? They have some incredible looking upper control arms.

 

http://mzoffroad.com/chevy-4wd-mid-travel-coilovers-14-15.html

 

http://mzoffroad.com/14-15-chevy-1500-uniball-upper-control-arms.html

 

This combo looks really nice. Expensive, but appears bullet-proof.

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

sethwick75 Enthusiast

sethwick75

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

 

 

Thanks for the input. I'm new to all of this. I had an F-150 with Bilsteins on it, but before that truck my previous lifted truck was my '72 Chevy single cab, std bed with an 8" on 35's. Suspension has changed dramatically since I owned that truck. Unfortunately I sold that truck. Never should have! Still have a '72 Blazer, but with only a 2" spring lift.

tyrich88 Enthusiast

tyrich88

Posted
Posted

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

Good info! I am looking into replacing my shocks eventually as well and seeing as this is my daily driver, the icons sound way better for my usage.

ChevyRoofer Senior Enthusiast

ChevyRoofer

Posted
Posted

 

The Kings are on awesome option, however Mazzulla is a little misleading with the advertising. The $1799.00 is for the standard blue king Option.

 

For a daily driven truck, I would really recomend Icon Vehicle Dynamics. They use a digressive valving in their shocks, which is going to absorb the smaller stuff on the road a lot better than a King or Fox.

 

King and Fox are a great off road performance shock, Icon is perfect for daily driven, on road driven vehicles but still has the same performance off road as found with the King and Fox. They just spend a little more R&D testing on vehicles.

 

King and Fox do their tuning by weights of vehicles and what they find would work best based on that application, whereas Icon does real world testing on the vehicle to fine tune performance.

 

Good info, I've heard the exact same thing.

 

$2800 for the King/Mazzulla setup is pretty steep for not off roading every week haha.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

Anyone priced out an Icon set up?

The Icon stage 1 kit with 2.0 shocks starts @ $1,800.00 with no upper control arm & prices go all the way up to $4,147 for the complete stage 5 kit which has larger 2.5 shocks with remote reservoirs.

All of the Icon kits I am referring to are for 1-3" of lift.

 

http://iconvehicledynamics.com/shop/455-complete-suspension-systems

ChevyRoofer Senior Enthusiast

ChevyRoofer

Posted
Posted

Anyone priced out an Icon set up?

 

The Icon stage 1 kit with 2.0 shocks starts @ $1,800.00 with no upper control arm & prices go all the way up to $4,147 for the complete stage 5 kit which has larger 2.5 shocks with remote reservoirs.

All of the Icon kits I am referring to are for 1-3" of lift.

 

http://iconvehicledynamics.com/shop/455-complete-suspension-systems

 

Looks to be $ 2800 as well for the same style kit. Same price as the Mazzulla and King kit. If they were the same price, I'd def go Mazzulla/King.

A.J. Curtis Enthusiast

A.J. Curtis

Posted
Posted

 

 

Looks to be $ 2800 as well for the same style kit. Same price as the Mazzulla and King kit. If they were the same price, I'd def go Mazzulla/King.

Yes but the basic Mazzulla kit does not include the rear shocks which are an extra $783.00

so the Mazzulla kit with King coil overs $1,799 + rear king shocks $783. + control arms $1,000 = $3,580.00

 

If you do not need 2.5 shocks with reservoirs you can get a complete 2.0 kit from icon for $2,813

 

I still think the King set up would be better but that depends on how thick your wallet is :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • FiLo
      5.3 / 6.2 valve covers / oil burning

      By FiLo · Posted

      Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • Deadwood
      primary drive belt tensioner

      By Deadwood · Posted

      I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • Deadwood
      10L1000 anyone with High Mileage ? I hate Damocles....

      By Deadwood · Posted

      New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • swathdiver
      6 Speed vs 8 Speed

      By swathdiver · Posted

      At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • GMCustomerService
      Will not stay in Reverse

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...