Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On ‎8‎/‎6‎/‎2018 at 3:09 PM, fatkid24 said:

 

 


You didn’t buy two part number pieces? It all came with the one part number? The 84526978?

Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Correct, just one part number and it all came together in the box.  I think the "kit" is the one that I ordered from OEM Parts World and it had a pigtail already in the box along with the new module.

 

The part number 84526978 you referenced is correct.

 

https://www.oempartsworld.com/oem-parts/gm-f-module-pkg-84526978

 

 

Edited by isalas
add info
Posted

***BACKORDER UPDATE!!***

 

I have FINALLY received materials and began shipping all booked orders.  THANK YOU very much for your patience for those of you that purchased one.  ALL booked orders have been filled.  A large # were shipped today, the remaining will ship tomorrow.  Anyone who purchased one of these should have received an email from the USPS on the outbound shipment.  I appreciate everyone's patience and support.  

 

Thanks!

 

Phil

Posted

Hi Pete, got the harness. plugged it in my 2017 Yukon Denali and everything is fine. I have the iPhone 8plus and found that flipping the rubber mat helped. thank you.

 

 

Posted
On 8/9/2018 at 5:42 PM, isalas said:

Correct, just one part number and it all came together in the box.  I think the "kit" is the one that I ordered from OEM Parts World and it had a pigtail already in the box along with the new module.

 

The part number 84526978 you referenced is correct.

 

https://www.oempartsworld.com/oem-parts/gm-f-module-pkg-84526978

 

 

What was the timeline between when you ordered the part, and when you received it?  I placed an order on OEM Parts World 5 days ago, and it still says “processing” as the order status. I emailed them and have not heard a response. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

FYI, 

GM made a retro-fit kit for the older vehicles that didn't not originally include the Qi charging. made available May 9, 2018.

 

GM# 84526978 includes the new charger and wiring harness. 

 

GM service Bulletin# 18-NA-153 (I dont have the PDF)

 

Chart

https://my.chevrolet.com/content/dam/gmownercenter/gmna/static/pageImages/learnAbout/articles/documents/GM_Wireless_Charging_Compatible_Device.pdf

Edited by 05SIERRAMAN
Posted (edited)

Crap. Just sent the $25 harness payment to Phil before seeing this last post about the updated module. Can you refund me?  Just sent a PM also...

Edited by ebelp
Posted (edited)

I think I may have received a bad module. I plugged the new updated module into my 17 Denali along with the new harness, and nothing is working. I've set the phone directly onto the module and it's not picking anything up. I have an S7 with a broken charging port, so I have to use wireless charging exclusively. I have wireless chargers all around my house, so I know it can't be my phone with the issue.

 

I thought maybe there's a blown fuse. Checked the manual and none of the fuses are labeled for the charger. 

Edited by Graeme Andrews
Posted (edited)

Would anyone know what fuse number the charger is? Can't find it in the manual and can only find it on a Colorado online. Using a meter I didn't get anything from the purple and black wires.

 

2017 1500 Sierra

 

Edit

OK, confirmed the module works, hooked it up to my mower and it charged my phone. Just need to find where it's getting power from. 

Edited by sgand2010
Posted

Any one found out if a 2019 wireless charger is

1. Fits in a 2014-2018 model or can be modified too easily fit? I have Phil's pigtail installed to upgrade my 16 to 18 wireless charger already... Works great but always want a faster charger.

2. Is the 2019 version a quick charge wireless vs a 2018 model.

Thanks in advance if you hear an update.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 9/15/2018 at 7:05 PM, 05SIERRAMAN said:

FYI, 

GM made a retro-fit kit for the older vehicles that didn't not originally include the Qi charging. made available May 9, 2018.

 

GM# 84526978 includes the new charger and wiring harness. 

 

GM service Bulletin# 18-NA-153 (I dont have the PDF)

 

Chart

https://my.chevrolet.com/content/dam/gmownercenter/gmna/static/pageImages/learnAbout/articles/documents/GM_Wireless_Charging_Compatible_Device.pdf

This still requires splicing if you didnt have wireless charging before though correct? This is just the harness and charger. Not the mat or centre console part that I see

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Roscopcoletrain said:

This still requires splicing if you didnt have wireless charging before though correct? This is just the harness and charger. Not the mat or centre console part that I see

Rosco... yes its basically its a retrofit for the models that did not support Qi but still offered wireless charging,  never the less I bet its easy to add never the less, I believe there are many that have added wireless charging on the 2014/2015 models. 

Edited by 05SIERRAMAN
  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I think@pgamboa now has a way to tap into a 12v source without having to splice anything when adding wireless charging.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
Do you still have the harness for sale?
 
2016 Tahoe

Yes I do. Do you already have wireless charging?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...