Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This option is in the online "Build and Price" but it is under #7 Accessories under the "performance" tab.  It's kind of confusing since the other "GM performance" options like Cold air intake, and performance exhaust, are selectable in the regular "packages" section of the builder, but the lift kit doesn't appear there, that I can see. 

Posted
On 8/27/2018 at 11:53 AM, Sierra Dan said:

Ford F150's have Always sit higher than GM trucks as of late.

So there must be plenty of lower IQ people out there, considering the F150 has been America's best selling truck.... oh since the Dawn of Time!  LOL

The T1's are taller than the K2s. Especially the bed. They are becoming more on par with Ford it seems.

actually I don't think this is true. I looked at a T1 and a K2 truck today side by side at the dealer, and while the upper part of the bed is higher, the actual bumper and load floor of the bed are in fact lower on the 2019, which should make it easier to step up into the bed and load things into it. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

So I have spoke to about a half dozen dealerships to get truck pricing and install costs on this.  It ranges from $400-$600 WTF isnt this a 4.5hr job.  Do all dealerships have the same labor rate? 

 

 

Posted

That is strange. Someone posted a picture from chevys website that showed it as $1899 installed if i remember right. 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

So I have spoke to about a half dozen dealerships to get truck pricing and install costs on this.  It ranges from $400-$600 WTF isnt this a 4.5hr job.  Do all dealerships have the same labor rate? 

 

 

That's accurate install cost.  They're all different rates.  That's $100-125/hr, going rate for dealership labor.  My independent shop is $110.  

Edited by Leevon
Posted
12 hours ago, Polar61 said:

Anyone know if this kit will fit 2018 Silverado?

It's for 2019 only.  The new trucks have a totally redesigned suspension system.

Posted (edited)
On ‎1‎/‎28‎/‎2019 at 2:25 AM, protovack said:

actually I don't think this is true. I looked at a T1 and a K2 truck today side by side at the dealer, and while the upper part of the bed is higher, the actual bumper and load floor of the bed are in fact lower on the 2019, which should make it easier to step up into the bed and load things into it. 

It is True.

According to specs, the F-150 Is nearly 2" Taller Overall for similar trim and cab configurations between the two brands.

 

2019 Chevy Silverado 4x4 Specs:

 

image.thumb.png.32bd15a97c151edd786814bc18141aa7.png

 

 

 

2019 Ford F-150 4x4 Specs:

SuperCrew

             
Pickup box style

5.5-ft. Styleside

5.5-ft. Styleside

6.5-ft. Styleside

6.5-ft. Styleside

8.0-ft. Styleside

8.0-ft. Styleside

5.5-ft. Raptor

Drive system

4x2 4x4

4x2

4x4

4x2

4x4

4x4

Wheelbase

145.0 in.

145.0 in.

156.8 in.

156.8 in. - -

146.0 in.

Overall length

231.9 in. 231.9 in.

243.7 in.

243.7 in.

- -

231.9 in.

Cab height

75.6 in.

77.2 in.

75.7 in.

77.3 in. - -

78.5 in

 

Edited by Sierra Dan
Posted
On 2/22/2019 at 9:31 AM, Sierra Dan said:

It is True.

According to specs, the F-150 Is nearly 2" Taller Overall for similar trim and cab configurations between the two brands.

 

2019 Chevy Silverado 4x4 Specs:

 

image.thumb.png.32bd15a97c151edd786814bc18141aa7.png

 

 

 

2019 Ford F-150 4x4 Specs:

SuperCrew

             
Pickup box style

5.5-ft. Styleside

5.5-ft. Styleside

6.5-ft. Styleside

6.5-ft. Styleside

8.0-ft. Styleside

8.0-ft. Styleside

5.5-ft. Raptor

Drive system

4x2 4x4

4x2

4x4

4x2

4x4

4x4

Wheelbase

145.0 in.

145.0 in.

156.8 in.

156.8 in. - -

146.0 in.

Overall length

231.9 in. 231.9 in.

243.7 in.

243.7 in.

- -

231.9 in.

Cab height

75.6 in.

77.2 in.

75.7 in.

77.3 in. - -

78.5 in

 

What I’ve always noticed is yes fords appears taller, as does dodge.  But when you actually look at it with more attention you realize alot of it is the body of these trucks ate taller.  In fact the body being taller, along with not accounting for the extra height and keeping the wheel width is why fords had so many roll overs with their explorers.  Same is true to probably a lesser extent with the F250s. I personally know 3 people who have rolled them.  I know of no one personally who have rolled Silverado’s.  I am a fire fighter and have seen silverados that have rolled, but these weren’t due to design.  It usually involved a multi car accident on interstates where the truck when off the side of the road down large drop offs after the initial impact wth other vehicles.

 

fords and dodges are taller, but a lot of it is the body itself is taller.  They do have alittlw extra ground clearance, but in the overall picture I believe the body accounts for more.

my feelings are that GM in there testing, and logic knew a combination of lower stance and wider stance provided better handling and overall safety.

 

having said all that, I like taller also and usually make my silverados taller.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 2/28/2019 at 12:17 PM, obfirefighter22 said:

What I’ve always noticed is yes fords appears taller, as does dodge.  But when you actually look at it with more attention you realize alot of it is the body of these trucks ate taller.  In fact the body being taller, along with not accounting for the extra height and keeping the wheel width is why fords had so many roll overs with their explorers.  Same is true to probably a lesser extent with the F250s. I personally know 3 people who have rolled them.  I know of no one personally who have rolled Silverado’s.  I am a fire fighter and have seen silverados that have rolled, but these weren’t due to design.  It usually involved a multi car accident on interstates where the truck when off the side of the road down large drop offs after the initial impact wth other vehicles.

 

fords and dodges are taller, but a lot of it is the body itself is taller.  They do have alittlw extra ground clearance, but in the overall picture I believe the body accounts for more.

my feelings are that GM in there testing, and logic knew a combination of lower stance and wider stance provided better handling and overall safety.

 

having said all that, I like taller also and usually make my silverados taller.

Ford's have typically been taller because the cab is mounted slightly higher relative to the frame to give it a flatter floor in the cab. The cab also has slightly more headroom vs the GM k2's. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...