Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On ‎6‎/‎21‎/‎2019 at 7:42 PM, Moend said:

Looks good. 

How much weight you were hauling and how did you like it.

It's around 10,500 lbs. It does great around town but on the interstate when you get above 70mph you feel a slight sway. I am using air bags but no weight distribution hitch. The WDH could improve that. I just ordered a gooseneck hitch for it. So we'll see if that improves any. Overall I love the truck!!!

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, MTB10 said:

6.2L with the new tranny is a joy to tow.

 

23wm8he.jpg

Is that an Off-Water Boat ? :D

Good looking setup! :thumbs:

Edited by Sierra Dan
  • Like 1
Posted
On 2019-06-23 at 4:51 AM, markyezy said:

Hello all...

 

I am finally back to GM - my first truck was a 1994 GMC Sierra - I had that for 10 years and over 500,000kms with no major repairs till it was stolen, had 2 failed ecoboost adventures and returned with a 2019 LT last week! 

 

A few pictures below, so far shes been through her first snow storm already! I have a before and after of the window tint, 15% on the fronts, and changed to bowtie for a black one!

 

Things in the works are larger tires - I dont want to put a lift or a level kit on it, what is the largest tire I can fit on the 18" factory rims? I am think of getting Fuel Beast rims ... anyone know if I will have any issues installing them? I am getting a bakflip, the box sprayed and the wheel wells sprayed with LineX, also getting the GM fog lights installed.

 

Cheers all!

 
 
cleardot.gif
 

A0A7A9DB-5535-4121-BBB9-08D5824471B5.JPG

F277924B-CD85-42E1-BAE9-907B76096978.JPG

IMG_1869.jpg

IMG_2063.jpg

IMG_2077.jpg

IMG_2091.jpg

IMG_2100.jpg

IMG_2101.jpg

 

On 2019-06-23 at 4:51 AM, markyezy said:

Hello all...

 

I am finally back to GM - my first truck was a 1994 GMC Sierra - I had that for 10 years and over 500,000kms with no major repairs till it was stolen, had 2 failed ecoboost adventures and returned with a 2019 LT last week! 

 

A few pictures below, so far shes been through her first snow storm already! I have a before and after of the window tint, 15% on the fronts, and changed to bowtie for a black one!

 

Things in the works are larger tires - I dont want to put a lift or a level kit on it, what is the largest tire I can fit on the 18" factory rims? I am think of getting Fuel Beast rims ... anyone know if I will have any issues installing them? I am getting a bakflip, the box sprayed and the wheel wells sprayed with LineX, also getting the GM fog lights installed.

 

Cheers all!

 
 
cleardot.gif
 

A0A7A9DB-5535-4121-BBB9-08D5824471B5.JPG

F277924B-CD85-42E1-BAE9-907B76096978.JPG

IMG_1869.jpg

IMG_2063.jpg

IMG_2077.jpg

IMG_2091.jpg

IMG_2100.jpg

IMG_2101.jpg

Congrats on the new rig.  By any chance was that northern Alberta or British Columbia?  Heard they got a good dumping last week....

Posted

Traded my 16 in a little while back for a 19 AT4. 1.5" motofab, 275/65/20 Ko2, GM intake, flowmaster 40 series, lund window visors, 20% front tint and windshield brow, ronin stuby antenna, some more stuff to come.

20190624_200029.jpg

20190624_200106.jpg

20190624_200147.jpg

  • Like 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Mash2k10 said:

Traded my 16 in a little while back for a 19 AT4. 1.5" motofab, 275/65/20 Ko2, GM intake, flowmaster 40 series, lund window visors, 20% front tint and windshield brow, ronin stuby antenna, some more stuff to come.

20190624_200029.jpg

20190624_200106.jpg

20190624_200147.jpg

Did u have the 8sp in ur 16? Does this one drive better? Been close o. A few but kinda wanting the 6.210spd combo after all my 8spd troubles

Posted
3 minutes ago, jamin87ss said:

Did u have the 8sp in ur 16? Does this one drive better? Been close o. A few but kinda wanting the 6.210spd combo after all my 8spd troubles

16 was a 5.3 with 6 speed slt premium package, over all no complaints. This one so far has been good, its another 5.3 with the 8 speed this time. Has a little over 4k miles on it now. My only complaint is the auto start/stop which I always try to disable before I start driving. Can't go wrong with the 6.2/10spd. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Joe98 said:

 

Congrats on the new rig.  By any chance was that northern Alberta or British Columbia?  Heard they got a good dumping last week....

Thank you!

 

The snow was driving between Jasper and Lake Louise over the ice fields - was headed to Calgary and had to turn around as they closed the road half way up!

 

Where are you located?

 

Posted
6 hours ago, markyezy said:

Thank you!

 

The snow was driving between Jasper and Lake Louise over the ice fields - was headed to Calgary and had to turn around as they closed the road half way up!

 

Where are you located?

 

I’m in Ontario...half hour north of Toronto.   Yes, saw on the news...got pretty nasty out there.   That must really suck...snow storm in June. Oh well, look at the bright side...at least you were driving a worthy and capable truck..?

Posted
11 hours ago, Sex&Trucks said:

Put in a B and W gooseneck hitch in. With a gooseneck adaptor. 

35C81929-C708-40C3-B1E3-41C3047CF344.jpeg

You could add &Camping to your Sex&Trucks username! :thumbs:

Great looking setup you have there.

Posted
14 hours ago, Jason Fuller said:

She needs a bath but the silver still looks clean without!! Way easier to take care of than my 16 midnight edition was!!

IMG_20190625_171202291_HDR.jpg

IMG_20190625_171131154_HDR.jpg

IMG_20190619_154445_01.jpg

They sure did a good job on these TB's in my opinion. The fact that they're going to offer them with the 6.2, is a good move. I have a feeling they're going to sell a lot of them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...