Jump to content

Gas Mileage on 5.3 V8 engine on a 4x4

Wiggums

Recommended Posts

Wintersun Enthusiast

Wintersun

Posted
Posted

With older pickups the vortex at the rear of the bed added drag and reduced fuel economy. Leaving the tailgate down or taking it off the truck fixed the problem. A shell reduces this turbulence but it also adds weight and if it sticks up past the cab it will also create more drag. For me the gain it usable space in the bed that is protected from the weather and from thieves is far more important that saving a few pennies in fuel costs.

 

Newer trucks have cabs designed to improve airflow and the new Ram 1500 has an air foil design for the rear tailgate on their trucks. Some new trucks have taller sides for the beds to also make them more aerodynamic.

 

But putting on heavier tires or ones with more scrubbing action or that stick out past the fenders or raising the truck will negate all these improvements. So will driving faster than necessary as air drag increases exponentially. Drive 2x faster and air drag is 4x greater.

 

My new Traverse gets 34 mpg at 55 mph and 28 mpg at 62 mph and 24 mpg at 70 mph on the highway. So I have to decide whether the conditions warrant the speed at which I am driving.

  • 7 months later...
  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
flat3500 Enthusiast

flat3500

Posted
Posted

60-65 drafting with a tonneau cover 30.1 for 50 miles,going to St louis this weekend see what it does then

IMG_20191119_183116638_HDR.jpg

BlancoSilverado Enthusiast

BlancoSilverado

Posted
Posted
On 3/20/2019 at 10:42 AM, Controller23 said:

You never got 28mpg in a v8 Silverado. Would someone ban this ****ing troll?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I personal got 27.6 MPG for a 50 mile duration (99% highway). 5.3 L84 4x4 8-speed. 

Doolin-Dalton Enthusiast

Doolin-Dalton

Posted
Posted
On 3/20/2019 at 1:42 PM, Controller23 said:

You never got 28mpg in a v8 Silverado. Would someone ban this ****ing troll?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dude attached a sail in the back of his bed, then he was rolling downhill for 1-2 miles and called it 28.  On the reality side of things, mine (5.3V8, AFM, 6spd) easily gets the 22mpg at 65-70mph cruise control, relatively flat terrain on the interstate all day long, and that's excellent for this size truck.  

madconcept Enthusiast

madconcept

Posted
Posted

2019 Sierra Elevation 5.3 4x4.

Best I ever got was 10.7L per 100km

which converts to 22mpg.

That was taking it easy on a flat Hwy.

My daily average is 16-17 L/100km(14mpg) mix of Hwy and city stop and go driving.

I’m also running BFG KO2 LT265/65/R20’s and a level kit which I’m sure eats into the fuel economy a bit.

Also doesn’t help that I love opening it up frequently, love the power!

Living in a hilly area doesn’t help either!

My last truck, 2007 Silverado 5.3 was hovering around 19 L/100 km and it had less power.

Dunn Senior Enthusiast

Dunn

Posted
Posted

5k miles on 19 RST 4x4 and avg 16.9 mpg

50/50 freeway and street in so cal traffic

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 11/22/2019 at 6:17 PM, Doolin-Dalton said:

Dude attached a sail in the back of his bed, then he was rolling downhill for 1-2 miles and called it 28.  On the reality side of things, mine (5.3V8, AFM, 6spd) easily gets the 22mpg at 65-70mph cruise control, relatively flat terrain on the interstate all day long, and that's excellent for this size truck.  

Then how did the DIC show 50 mile trip at 28 mpg? I was the one who accomplished that. Very flat surface all the way to SNA airport and back. This time, I drove to LAX and got 31 mpg. That was going 55 mph in Los Angeles, 100% highway, absolutely no stopping anywhere, just a steady foot on the gas pedal.

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 11/19/2019 at 4:42 PM, flat3500 said:

60-65 drafting with a tonneau cover 30.1 for 50 miles,going to St louis this weekend see what it does then

IMG_20191119_183116638_HDR.jpg

I am really curious to see what gas mileage you get. Also a 5.3 V8 with 3.23? Mine is and driving 100% freeway without hitting the gas pedal going 55 mph got me 31 mpg.

 

It seems the Chevrolet is much easier to hypermile on compared to other cars. My Ford was pretty good but the Chevrolet takes the cake. I have been debating with myself.. should I get a tonneau. When I put the shell on my Ford F-150 (2016 4x4 with V8), gas mileage dropped from 22 to 19. I was not pleased, it wasn't a heavy shell or anything.

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 11/22/2019 at 9:17 AM, BlancoSilverado said:

I personal got 27.6 MPG for a 50 mile duration (99% highway). 5.3 L84 4x4 8-speed. 

 

I had him blocked ever since he couldn't handle me badmouthing my new Silverado when it handled poorly on rough surface with the twin-tube shocks (I have an RST with Z71).

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 11/23/2019 at 6:20 AM, madconcept said:

2019 Sierra Elevation 5.3 4x4.

Best I ever got was 10.7L per 100km

which converts to 22mpg.

That was taking it easy on a flat Hwy.

My daily average is 16-17 L/100km(14mpg) mix of Hwy and city stop and go driving.

I’m also running BFG KO2 LT265/65/R20’s and a level kit which I’m sure eats into the fuel economy a bit.

Also doesn’t help that I love opening it up frequently, love the power!

Living in a hilly area doesn’t help either!

My last truck, 2007 Silverado 5.3 was hovering around 19 L/100 km and it had less power.

"eats into the fuel economy a bit.." Only a bit? I have had bigger tires put on cars in the past and the difference was huge in all three of them! That was why I stopped doing that when I was in my 30's. No way I will consider bigger tires.

mistaare Enthusiast

mistaare

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

When I put the shell on my Ford F-150 (2016 4x4 with V8), gas mileage dropped from 22 to 19. I was not pleased, it wasn't a heavy shell or anything.

That’s what I’m afraid of. I have a cap ordered and I am dreading the hit in mpg, I am only getting 14-15 mpg driving easy, with 70% city/30% highway. 2-3 mpg hit when I’m only getting 14 mpg is gonna suck. 

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 hours ago, mistaare said:

That’s what I’m afraid of. I have a cap ordered and I am dreading the hit in mpg, I am only getting 14-15 mpg driving easy, with 70% city/30% highway. 2-3 mpg hit when I’m only getting 14 mpg is gonna suck. 

City miles can be a killer on the gas mileage, same thing with mine. I try to use my truck for long-distance such as to Vegas, Hermosillo, or to the airport. For short trips, I have the Peugeot which gets almost identical highway mileage.

MacLaren Enthusiast

MacLaren

Posted
Posted

Man, I cant get over how much I love this new Silverado. The days of 17 city and 19 highway are lone gone! ( actually that mileage in a V8 ain't nothin to sneeze at anyways! )

In my 07 Classic, I would usually get about 375 miles to the tank before I would need to fill up.

I maybe have really, really, pushed it to 400 a couple times, but that's runnin on fumes, or at least that's how I remembered it. Its mighty nice to get a range of at least 500 miles now. 

20191121_125430.thumb.jpg.f54cff4b22c8ed45d48b5750afcc5ed5.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...