Jump to content

Catch Can Skeptic

CSI-WALLEYE
 Share

Recommended Posts

'17 Sierra Enthusiast

'17 Sierra

Posted
Posted

I agree that it would be nice to see a study on this. I'm a believer, I have an E2 on mine. The question is how much of the oil in the crankcase vapors is actually caught with a catch can. It might look like a lot but that question has never been answered. That milky substance that many seem to think is REALLY bad for the motor, isn't. That is just condensation that's mixed with the oil that hasn't been heated enough to evaporate yet. Moisture won't hurt anything once it's in the combustion chamber and once the oil heats up enough, the condensation just evaporates, burns in the CC and goes down the line and out the pipe.

  • Like 1
  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

L86 All Terrain
L86 All Terrain

GM installs catch cans on all boosted V8's, and perhaps even the LT1 cars if I am not mistaken. All LT4/5 cars are equipped with catch cans from what I have been told. So they have done the research,

MaverickZ71
MaverickZ71

Just think about all of this crap today.  Back in the day, a simple valve cover breather used to take care of everything.  But that's against the law now.  The more mankind 'progresses', the more we m

Nitrousbird
Nitrousbird

Or use simple logic.  If oil isn't hitting the valves, what would be building up on them?  Exactly.     If you reduce the amount of oil hitting the valves, common sense would tell you that y

Posted Images

15 Z71 Senior Enthusiast

15 Z71

Posted
Posted

I say just drive it. Lots of people with these 14 and newer trucks with no problems and no cans. I work with a couple of people that have over a 100,000 and 0 issues. Dont think it matters either way.

CSI-WALLEYE Enthusiast

CSI-WALLEYE

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, '17 Sierra said:

I agree that it would be nice to see a study on this. I'm a believer, I have an E2 on mine. The question is how much of the oil in the crankcase vapors is actually caught with a catch can. It might look like a lot but that question has never been answered. That milky substance that many seem to think is REALLY bad for the motor, isn't. That is just condensation that's mixed with the oil that hasn't been heated enough to evaporate yet. Moisture won't hurt anything once it's in the combustion chamber and once the oil heats up enough, the condensation just evaporates, burns in the CC and goes down the line and out the pipe.

This is an example of how the fact oil is found in a can could be misinterpreted.  If the can preferentially removed water as compared to oil, then the can could make deposits worse.  Because theoretically, the water could soften deposits and if the can removed the water it could actually concentrate the oil being delivered to the valves.  I don't think this is happening but the fact is that you don't know unless you perform the experiment.

  • Like 1
M-Wheeler Enthusiast

M-Wheeler

Posted
Posted

Best way to see if a catch can really works is to install 2 of them. Have one dump to the other. If the 2nd one is collecting anything, then you know the first can is not working like it should....

 

Anyhow, with that being said, I empty mine every 1,000miles and have about an ounce of crap each time.

 

Also, PRIOR to every oil change (5K) I do the DI/Turbo intake clean. I made a special fitting on CAI after my MAF, spray in 1-2 second bursts at 2000rpm, let soak for an hour, run it down freeway for 10-20 miles. dump oil/filter, rinse repeat. 

 

35K, runs like a top!

  • Like 1
Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, M-Wheeler said:

Best way to see if a catch can really works is to install 2 of them. Have one dump to the other. If the 2nd one is collecting anything, then you know the first can is not working like it should....

 

Anyhow, with that being said, I empty mine every 1,000miles and have about an ounce of crap each time.

 

Also, PRIOR to every oil change (5K) I do the DI/Turbo intake clean. I made a special fitting on CAI after my MAF, spray in 1-2 second bursts at 2000rpm, let soak for an hour, run it down freeway for 10-20 miles. dump oil/filter, rinse repeat. 

 

35K, runs like a top!

Let me see this fitting you made. That’s a great idea. 

 

Ive done the cleaning once so far and just sprayed it in the pcv inlet on the side of the intake

  • Thanks 1
Gagliano7 Enthusiast

Gagliano7

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think the best thing to do is clean the valves once a year with the CRC spray or sea foam. I have seen videos where this works. I think the catch can is a waste of money but i know on here i am in the minority.  Think about how many gm trucks and suv's with these motors don't have a catch can. Probably 99% of them on the road which is millions.

Edited by Gagliano7
  • Like 1
Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Gagliano7 said:

I think the best thing to do is clean the valves once a year with the CRC spray or sea foam. I have seen videos where this works. I think the catch can is a waste of money but i know on here i am in the minority.  Think about how many gm trucks and suv's with these motors don't have a catch can. Probably 99% of them on the road which is millions.

When u can get one on eBay for $50 bucks I’d hardly say it’s a waste of money. That’s cheap insurance

  • Like 1
TRKLGND Enthusiast

TRKLGND

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Jacoby said:

When u can get one on eBay for $50 bucks I’d hardly say it’s a waste of money. That’s cheap insurance

The $50 ebay cans are not the one the guys here are installing.  Most of what I see recommended start at around $200.

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

It can't hurt  anything so I see no reason not to have one.

I put one on my 2012 that does not have GDI.

Cheaper than an insurance payment probably.

 

:)

  • Like 2
Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, paracutin said:

The $50 ebay cans are not the one the guys here are installing.  Most of what I see recommended start at around $200.

I agree. My point was that there are cheap cans out there that provide the same function as the more expensive ones. Therefore it being so cheap doesn’t mean it’s a waste of money. 

TRKLGND Enthusiast

TRKLGND

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jacoby said:

I agree. My point was that there are cheap cans out there that provide the same function as the more expensive ones. Therefore it being so cheap doesn’t mean it’s a waste of money. 

They absolutely do not!  Most of the $50 ebay cans are simply an empty can.  No baffling, no screens, nothing to keep whatever comes in from going right back out.  
Disclaimer: I do not use a catch can so I have no dog in this fight but I have see the results from many test, unscientific as they may be, that show the cheap cans collect almost nothing compared to the $200+ cans.
Since you seem to think that $50 is cheap and not a waste of money I have a case of empty beer cans (catch cans) you can buy.  Only $10 each.  Quite a deal! :D

CSI-WALLEYE Enthusiast

CSI-WALLEYE

Posted
  • Author
Posted
53 minutes ago, paracutin said:

They absolutely do not!  Most of the $50 ebay cans are simply an empty can.  No baffling, no screens, nothing to keep whatever comes in from going right back out.  
Disclaimer: I do not use a catch can so I have no dog in this fight but I have see the results from many test, unscientific as they may be, that show the cheap cans collect almost nothing compared to the $200+ cans.
Since you seem to think that $50 is cheap and not a waste of money I have a case of empty beer cans (catch cans) you can buy.  Only $10 each.  Quite a deal! :D

Just out of curiosity, you seem to be knowledgeable about the cans but do not use one.  Would you be willing to share your reasoning? 

TRKLGND Enthusiast

TRKLGND

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CSI-WALLEYE said:

Just out of curiosity, you seem to be knowledgeable about the cans but do not use one.  Would you be willing to share your reasoning? 

Absolutely.
1st: As you pointed out in your OP, there is no proof they actually lessen intake valve deposits.  

2nd: It gets pretty cold in the winter where I live.  I have seen several instances where folks report mail seal failure due to over-pressurization.  The dealer and or mechanics attributed this to the catch can freezing.  This brings me to number 3.

3rd: Depending on your dealer, this type of modification can cause them to deny warranty coverage for most anything engine related.  Someone is going to quote the Mag-Moss Warranty Act and that the dealer or GM has to prove that your mod caused the issue they are refusing to warranty.  This is all true.  However, depending on the issue, I may not have the funds to pay for the repairs out of pocket while fighting with GM over the warranty.  I also own only one vehicle so I can't afford to be without mine for an extended period.   I'm not a gambler by nature and certainly not with a $50k truck.

There are other reasons but we'll start with those.

Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, paracutin said:

They absolutely do not!  Most of the $50 ebay cans are simply an empty can.  No baffling, no screens, nothing to keep whatever comes in from going right back out.  
Disclaimer: I do not use a catch can so I have no dog in this fight but I have see the results from many test, unscientific as they may be, that show the cheap cans collect almost nothing compared to the $200+ cans.
Since you seem to think that $50 is cheap and not a waste of money I have a case of empty beer cans (catch cans) you can buy.  Only $10 each.  Quite a deal! :D

Dude back in the day all the cans were empty.  All guys did was fill it with a steel scouring pad to use as a filter.  Open up a $200 catch can and they use the same thing.  Youre just paying extra for them to include it in their design.  These engines don't produce enough vacuum to suck up fluid from the bottom of the can.  Theres tons of folks using cheap cans and collecting just as much fluid as the more expensive ones.  Im not advocating someone buying a cheaper can Im just saying that the design is simple.  Crankcase fumes go in one side and out the other.  Its as simple as that.  And don't make me out to be some **** by saying $50 isn't a lot of money.  That's not what I said.  But $50 is way less than $200.  That's just basic math

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      I was using recirc/max air. Especially if it really hot i start out by lowering the front windows a little with regular ac the go to recirculation after a few and rolling windows up. And it does not have the newest refrigerant. It has per the info under the hood r134. Not the new r1234yf.  
    • Atlas
      AC diagnostic on a neo-classic Camaro

      By Atlas · Posted

      tldr; Shade tree mechanic stumped by variable displacement AC compressor.   Not Silverado related, but for my 2000 Camaro SS. I've never really used the AC since acquiring the car a good handful of years ago. I plan to take it on a trip this summer so I wanted to make sure the AC was in good shape. On an 73 degree day in the shop with the car idling I set the AC on "Max", temp set to cold, and fan on hi. The compressor turned on and air turned nice and cold.   I let it run for several minutes but noticed the compressor never cycled off. The engine was up to temperature enough that it began cycling the cooling fans on high. I had a set of manifold gauges hooked up and it was consistently at about 25 psi on the low side and between 200 and 225 psi (warm engine) on the high side. Per temperature charts, the low side is low (should be 30-35) and the high side is a little high (up to 170 per chart). I read the low pressure as potentially being under-charged underscored by a continually running compressor This was also underscored by temp readings of mid-20 degrees at the vents. Not just cold, freezing cold. Switching off the AC but leaving the HVAC fan on high produced a deluge of condensation underneath the vehicle. I was getting ice buildup on the evap core most likely.   The low reading (25psi) concerned me that the compressor wasn't switching off so I swapped out the pressure switch. No change in behavior, still ran constantly.   The AC clutch works fine as it engages/disengages with the HVAC switch on command. The compressor relay is good as I swapped it with two different known good relays just to be sure. Having eliminated that, and the pressure switch, I added refrigerant, thinking the constant run and low "low" pressure were signs of a slight undercharge. Makes sense, the car is 26 years old and it doesn't appear the AC system has ever been touched.   Adding some R134a didn't meaningfully change the low side pressure. And that's when a lightbulb flashed upstairs. While I consider the car "old", it's possibly "new" enough to have a variable displacement compressor. Did some reading and sure enough. Dangit. I don't work on these for this reason.   Adding refrigerant means the compressor will just compensate and won't really change pressures until it's severely overcharged or undercharged. But at least I wasn't getting ice/frost anymore, but instead high 30 degree temps out of the vents. That's more normal, but with variable displacement now I have no idea where my charge level is at. It's probably overcharged now. The high side even with the engine radiating serious heat was never really over about 225.   The static pressure at room temperature is dead on, before and after the charge. Both high/low equalize after some rest.   I'm thinking I'll need to take it to a shop. I want the proper charge level so I'm not working the compressor too hard. The only way to get an accurate charge is to evacuate and then re-charge with the exact amount specified for the system -- at least that's what I'm reading.   Anyone here with modern automotive AC knowledge?  
    • Byrds8
      Ac not keeping up

      By Byrds8 · Posted

      Mine is in the shop for the AC now. While it did get cold after a bit, it would take a while to even start to cool the air at all. Turns out the compressor was bad and cycling. 
    • KARNUT
      Ac not keeping up

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I call B.S. when I first moved to Texas my first house would only cool to 80 with the Texas heat. The AC tech said it was normal at 100 degrees outside. I remodeled the house put in a new AC. I could hang meat. My cars may need recirculating to start. Once moving it switches to regular AC and I could hang meat. Living in Texas no one would put up with only 20 degrees difference. 
    • Silverado4x4
      Ac not keeping up

      By Silverado4x4 · Posted

      AC in home or auto only cool down 15-25 degrees from outside temp, but what will help is to put the ac in recirc mode this will recirc the Inside cabin air rather then trying to cool down the outside hot air, I always have mine in recirc mode.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...