Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, AMPRG said:

Take it back to the dealer for software update. 

Did that. Nothing different on my end. Did it work for you?

Posted

so o have a 2019 silverado 1500 LT and am having this same issue I have had the issue since day 1 aswell. Dealer replaced the camera still have the issue. Dealer advised me GM is working on a fix and to contact them to ensure even if i am out of warrenty it would be fixed. GM has given me the run around no answer nothing assuring me they will fix it when one becomes avilable to the point my issue was escalated after speaking several times to the senior advisor 2 days ago I recive a email stateing they cant reach me at my contact number proived... the same number i have spoken to them on multiple times so i called and left a voicemail with my number again haven't heard a word. From the start GM has given me the run around i owned a 2015 camaro. And now currently own a 2019 silverado and a 2018 traverse and im done with GM after this im so pissed they have been giving me the run around for over a month and no resolution they actually deny and claim there are no bullito  on the issue even when i give them the bulliton id the dealer gave me they actually told me he isn't supposed to have given me that. So GM has lost a customer after this oh and now today my Brakes say service brake system. 16,500 miles on my truck and nothing but problems **** you GM I'm hiring a attorney and filing for a lemon law

Posted

good luck on the lemon law i went to see an attorney he said would take 2 years to settle the case.. told him forget it i would trade the truck in before that.....i am have the same issue with the camera, but i have a intermittent   miss fire that comes and goes had truck 8 months only 4500 miles on it. its been at the dealer for 2 weeks now cause they need it to happen while they have it so god only knows when ill get it back..  GM is no help ..

Posted

Just got a 2019 RST and having the issue.  Strange thing is it didn't happen when I test drove it.  Kinda bizzare.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Hey guys, wanted to share that mine 2019 LT with 8in screen has a poor grainy camera, even flickers like a 80s tv. I am considering looking into the wiring to see if it can be tapped into using an aftermarket camera. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Having the same problem with my truck too. Sucks to have purchased a brand new truck that comes with issues. Also sucks to have GM say that because you didn't spend more on a higher package, your camera/screen is gonna suck, sorry, not sorry. However, besides that, I do love the truck. 

Posted

Got the service camera system message last week.

 

Horrible picture, grainy at all times, and it flickers with the touch of the brake or any other power draw.

 

Still "working" though.

Posted (edited)

Same result.  Truck to dealer w/ screen going out in reverse and lines while braking.  Radio replaced but did not resolve.  Dealer contacted GM, stated they recognize the issue and do not currently have a fix.  Just piling on my experience.

Edited by 2019SilvRST
Posted

I have a 2018 Sierra Duramax with SLT package and I get blue screen with “service rear camera” on screen. Happens often and always when truck is cold first thing in the morning. I’ll be call GM and NHTSA

 

 

Posted

OK I have a 2019 Chevy Z71 RST model I purchased and took home December 27th 2019 with 176 miles on the truck.  At night time sure enough, I pet the truck in revers to back in my driveway and I have this HORRIBLE grainey / Pixelated display and on one occasion the camera cut out and went back to the normal display screen.  I took it to the dealer on January 27th 2020 with 865 miles on the truck. They had the truck for three days to inform me that they could not reproduce the problem and that they compared it to other similar vehicles and it is operating as normal.  They also told me that I DO NOT HAVE THE HD Camera. (I though the RST had an HD Camera) They also told me there was no FACTORY HD Camera I could add to my truck.  Because the rear camera's picture quality is so BAD it is useless and when I went to just turn off the screen so I couls see out the mirrors with out the interfearance of the bright screen light, it appears that Chevy neglected to provide the ability to turn OFF the screen...... It's hard to believe that Chevy does not have access to the same camera technologey as other vehicle manaufactures or a too cheap to provide all of thier vehicles with a quality camera in light and dark conditions, especialy in a $46,000 truck. I want this issue resolved!

Checy_Rear_Cam_1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...