Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I have a 2008 GMC Sierra with the 5.3. I got a P0455 Evap code a while back. I can clear it but it comes back within a few days. When filling the truck up, when the pump shuts off gas spews from the canister area underneath the truck. I can usually always smell a raw fuel smell after driving from the bed area. Thanks! 

Posted

Check hoses and canister. The system should be sealed. A break will on the "seal" will set the code. In your case, hose from tank to canister is compromised.

Posted

System is normally open. Pcm closes the vent valve to test.

Posted

Evap is closed when verticals is off. Vapors from fuel tank are passed to the canister.. If pressure builds, the system has an over pressure release valve at the canister.

When the vehicle is running, a valve opens at a certain rpm to allow the stored vapors to be introduced into the intake.

Posted

Vent valve is open when vehicle is off,purge valve is closed when off,a guy did a test somewhere on here a ways back,purge valve opens on decel,he hooked up a test light to watch,now he didn't test light the vent valve,so during evap leak test,purge opens,vent closes for small leak test,then opens for large leak test?

Posted

What’s the easiest way to test all of this without pulling the bed?

Posted

Purge opens at certain rpm. Prior to rpm threshold, the system is sealed and there is some pressure which the computer checks with a pressure sensor. If no pressure, the code is set.

If leaking on fill, then there is a hole somewhere (100million + cars don't leak on fill)

Posted

Lots of write ups out there. In general, on earlier cars (20 years +) the valve was opened or closed when engine was warm and in gear and moving.

Later engines, once the engine warms up, the cake is pulse width opened. Small amounts in idle, larger amounts as rpm increases.

The 440 test occurs at one of two points. On some earlier cars, with a pressure sensor and the system purge valve known to be off. In a pulse width system, the system will measure vacuum pressure, shut the valve off and measure pressure again. If the vavuum pressure doesn't change enough, it will set a code.

Posted

I always shut the truck off when filling it up, but before shutting it off, it’s at idle of course, so around 800-1100 rpm

  • 5 years later...
Posted

Update: Top of fuel pump rotted out due to design of tank/pump and debris sit down in there. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...