Jump to content

Should I get the big bad 6.2


Recommended Posts

Posted

I think the 6.2 is the best bang for your buck option available. The cool thing about the new trucks is the multiple trims and options. I hear time and time again on this forum that for a daily driver the 6.2 is not needed. To me it's not as much a need as it's the most performance available. The mpg between the 5.3 and 6.2 is almost identical and the 2.7 is only slightly more. I seriously doubt if you are already looking at a trim level that offers the 6.2 that you will say " I wish I would have bought the 5.3". But I bet there are plenty of people who would say I wish I would have bought the 6.2. Not knocking the 5.3 I have owned several of them. But personally every one I owned I would have preferred to have more power. This time I purchased the most performance available and have 0 regrets.

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
2 hours ago, Chevyguy273 said:

With all that I have written so far. Am I crazy for wanting to buy the 6.2 because it’s more powerful and you get the 10 speed automatic with it? Or should I just get a 5.3 LTZ? 

Buy either one you like but pay cash, silly to take on a second job working for a bank for a vehicle, plus you'll sleep like a baby at night knowing full well it's yours.

Posted

The pay cash crowd for a new vehicle is amusing to me. When the day comes it cost me more use someone else’s money I’ll consider it. I make more with investment than the 0-2 percent it cost for a vehicle loan.

Posted

I do tow a really heavy trailer and have had three 6.2 powered Silverados all optioned pretty much the same. Crew cab LTZs with the 6.2 and max trailering package.  The 14 was a 6 speed and 3.73 gear the 17 was a 8 speed and 3.42 gear and the 20 is a 10 speed 3.42 gear. The 17 did get better mileage and was quicker with the 8 speed than the 14 but it did have the quirky shifting sometimes not enough to do anything about just mildly annoying. I have only had my 20 for 2 days but so far it seems to shift much smoother and has about the same power as the 17. That said I drove my brothers 19 LD double cab with a 5.3 and thought what a turd. Its about the same when I drive the wife's 5.3 18 Tahoe as it too seems under powered. She says the opposite that when she drives the truck it feels like a race car. I enjoy having the extra power do I absolutely need it??? Only occasionally when I am towing. Other than the initial cost and the premium fuel there really isn't a downside. I would recommend it as the 6.2 is way more fun to drive. 

Posted

Just popped my hood!  Over 100K on the engine...no issues!  Is it supposed to say 5.3 or 6.2?  No, clue? guess it means little to me.....

Posted
6 minutes ago, mookdoc6 said:

Just popped my hood!  Over 100K on the engine...no issues!  Is it supposed to say 5.3 or 6.2?  No, clue? guess it means little to me.....

Look at the sticker on this:

See the source image

Posted
Buy either one you like but pay cash, silly to take on a second job working for a bank for a vehicle, plus you'll sleep like a baby at night knowing full well it's yours.


Low interest and zero percent Financing is available too. For whatever reason, in the real world, most people can’t put aside that much due to whatever comes up in the family life. I write off, so can most. Zero % or very low % rates are very doable for just about anyone.


Sent from Above
Posted
7 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 Zero % or very low % rates are very doable for just about anyone.

 

That's a very cleverly designed trap. What happens when they lose their job and they have $300.00 in checking?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

49% Of Americans Expect To Live Paycheck To Paycheck This Year

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackfriedman/2020/02/19/financial-survey-debt-loans-credit/#1ca13a91578c

Posted
That's a very cleverly designed trap. What happens when they lose their job and they have $300.00 in checking?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

49% Of Americans Expect To Live Paycheck To Paycheck This Year

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackfriedman/2020/02/19/financial-survey-debt-loans-credit/#1ca13a91578c


Well then, you just can’t fix stupid. Don’t buy beyond your means.


Sent from Above
Posted

Get the 6.2! I traded my compromise 19 for a 6.2 2020 - however I also went from Z71 to the max tow package, so mine's a little different than your choice

Posted

Gotta say that I really love my 5.3

Hell, I'm getting as good or better mpg than my wife in her Toyota Highlander 

20200214_101928.thumb.jpg.c49c3757231e71444f1b30154610bbd2.jpg

Posted
1 minute ago, TXGREEK said:

They’re both great motors!


Sent from Above

Ya know what, that's the TRUTH!

Really cant gonwrong with either.

Posted

I'm all for the 6.2, but after driving a new style truck with a 5.3 8 speed for a bit, it is a lot more peppy than the old body style 5.3, and with just a short drive with a new body style 6.2, it didn't seem any quicker, if maybe a bit slower than an old body style 6.2.  I'd still get a 6.2 though.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...