Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I own a 2019 TB LT with 22k on odometer.  Truck is very clean and has leather and convenience 2.  My lease is done in 2 months.  My buyout price is $34,200.  Dealer will give me 47k for trade in.   Should I buy the truck and keep it?  Should I trade it in and take money and get new TB for inflated price?  Or finally another thought of mine was to trade it in and walk away with cash and find a 2003-05 Silverado in nice shape for 8-15k. 
reason I mention older trucks is them in my opinion were the best years of Silverado.   Just wantin to see what others would do in my shoe.  Oh , I do love the current TB I have. Tough call!

Let me hear your thoughts 

Thanks guys and gals 

Posted
18 minutes ago, shakenfake said:

Trade it in and go find a GMT-800

I agree, take your time and look for an exceptional 05 to early 07 extended cab 4x4 with the L33 or 1500HD with the 6.0 l.

Posted

Check Carvana before you do the dealer trade.  My wife had a Fusion lease ending, buyout was $13k, dealer offered $17k, Carvana offered $27k.

 

Of course, you'll need to find a replacement vehicle, which if that can't be done, I would just buy it out and keep looking for the next 12 months, just my opinion.

 

Good luck!

Posted
47 minutes ago, Radchad said:

So I own a 2019 TB LT with 22k on odometer.  Truck is very clean and has leather and convenience 2.  My lease is done in 2 months.  My buyout price is $34,200.  Dealer will give me 47k for trade in.   Should I buy the truck and keep it?  Should I trade it in and take money and get new TB for inflated price?  Or finally another thought of mine was to trade it in and walk away with cash and find a 2003-05 Silverado in nice shape for 8-15k. 
reason I mention older trucks is them in my opinion were the best years of Silverado.   Just wantin to see what others would do in my shoe.  Oh , I do love the current TB I have. Tough call!

Let me hear your thoughts 

Thanks guys and gals 

In your case of an obvious low mileage driver. 22K miles in 3 years. I would check out extended warranty if it’s reasonable and you like the truck, buy it. Your situation seems unique and position well for a buy out. At the end of the the warranty period truck prices will be back to normal. Once the chip shortage resolves there could be up to 3 model years of ( new) trucks dump on the market. A buyers market.

Posted

Sell it. Get cash, head down south and find a nice rust free 03-06 Silverado in excellent condition! 

Posted

If it were me, I would buy it out, you're not going to find a nice truck being 15-20 years old for that much money you come out ahead keep in mind used car/truck prices are off the hook right now and if you get an old truck, you will be kicking yourself in the ass because whatever you get will not compare to the TB.

 

If he is giving you 47k he will put it on the lot for about north of 50k at least, keep it you will regret it down grading to an old truck.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'd buy it out, wait for this craziness to be over with the chip shortage and sell it outright and buy new when the time is right. 

 

Just my .02

Posted
2 hours ago, vancealot29 said:

Check Carvana before you do the dealer trade.  My wife had a Fusion lease ending, buyout was $13k, dealer offered $17k, Carvana offered $27k.

 

Of course, you'll need to find a replacement vehicle, which if that can't be done, I would just buy it out and keep looking for the next 12 months, just my opinion.

 

Good luck!

I'd suggest Carvana too. I did it with my leased Lexus RX350 and they gave me a really good deal. OP, be aware (beware) that Carvana really sucks when getting paperwork together. It was a little bit of a hassle having to submit everything multiple times and them rejecting it for whatever made-up reasons. Sometimes they're a bit hit and miss. If they're offering more than the dealer, it may be worth it, it may not.

Posted

If selling is the desire. Check out CARPROUSA. Car pro USA. And ex car dealer turned radio help buyers, buy vehicles. Very popular and has dealers that he works with. He also likes give me the vin as an alternative to the others.

Posted

Thanks for all different thoughts on this.  I guess one thing that n my mind is I’m not sure if the reliability of the new trucks for the price.   Anybody have any thoughts on getting 100k trouble feee miles ?   
 

Posted

alot of dealerships arent letting people  sell leased cars to third party vendors for exact reason your talking about.......idk about GM but there is alot of buzz about this very thing......very shady, but it is a thing......they want the profits instead of the customer getting it......again idk about GM, just heard about it awhile ago and followed it for minute

 

bought 4 new trucks and sold same amt in last 4 years......just depended, sometimes carvana was highest, sometimes give me the vin, and even the dealership was higher for trade in........i just checked all of them with highest bidder getting the biz........these were all financed vehicles

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Dunn said:

alot of dealerships arent letting people  sell leased cars to third party vendors for exact reason your talking about.......idk about GM but there is alot of buzz about this very thing......very shady, but it is a thing......they want the profits instead of the customer getting it......again idk about GM, just heard about it awhile ago and followed it for minute

 

bought 4 new trucks and sold same amt in last 4 years......just depended, sometimes carvana was highest, sometimes give me the vin, and even the dealership was higher for trade in........i just checked all of them with highest bidder getting the biz........these were all financed vehicles

 

 

You are correct. GM  won't give the payoff info to anyone but a GM dealer. Same with Ford. That way they can get inventory for their dealers. 

Posted
15 hours ago, Radchad said:

Thanks for all different thoughts on this.  I guess one thing that n my mind is I’m not sure if the reliability of the new trucks for the price.   Anybody have any thoughts on getting 100k trouble feee miles ?   
 

If it has been trouble free so far, no reason it won't continue to be.  You can't go by only what you read in these forums.  For every complaint you see here, there are probably 50 others out there who are totally happy with their purchase.  It's very seldom that someone will come to a forum to just brag about how great their vehicle is.  If you go to others that follow Ford, Ram, Toyota, etc, you'd think those trucks were total junk as well by reading the issues talked about in them.  If it makes you feel better, discuss buying and extended warranty when buying out your lease; work it into the deal.  You probably won't find a truck like that for near that price right now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...