Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, PacksAWallop said:

Yeah, I've been really happy with the way the dealership has treated me on this.  Haven't heard from GM direct yet, but not sure what I would need from them anymore at this point?

I’m glad your dealership is treating you well.  My dealership also treated me very well back in 2016 when I had a Sierra with the known “Chevy Shake”.  Was absolutely horrible to drive above 50 mph.   They worked on it for about 5-6 months.  Couldn’t fix it. Bought it back and got me into a 2017 that was flawless.  Good luck and hopefully they fix the entire engine and not just one side.  Which is ridiculous if you ask me, especially with the stupid prices they are getting for trucks now a days.  

Posted
18 hours ago, TNTSilverado said:

I totally agree…..and what do we use to produce energy??🤔🤔🤔.  The insanity continues with these people

 

 

love your avatar name!!!!😂😂

its my grandpa initials Frederick jack Brewster 😉 ..... lol

  • Haha 1
Posted

Got the truck back from the dealer.  Put less then 200 miles on it and it's having the same symptoms it did before it failed the first time.  Thinking it will drop another new lifter on the way home from work today.  

  • Sad 1
Posted
5 hours ago, PacksAWallop said:

Got the truck back from the dealer.  Put less then 200 miles on it and it's having the same symptoms it did before it failed the first time.  Thinking it will drop another new lifter on the way home from work today.  

omg this suck bad, GM having serious problem with this issue 

Posted

Well, that's annoying. They replaced all the components and it's acting up. Makes me wonder if it went bad that fast or install error? 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, John813 said:

Well, that's annoying. They replaced all the components and it's acting up. Makes me wonder if it went bad that fast or install error? 

 

 

More bad parts, or maybe something else defective in the block?

Posted

Mechanic at the dealership said it could potentially be a problem with the actuators that they use to control the lifters for DFM.  The problem is that they're so difficult to repair/replace that GM doesn't allow them to even touch them unless they're certain that is what's causing the problem.  GM Customer Service is about useless at this point, told me the truck would have to fail 2 more times for them to take any meaningful action besides just pointing me back to the dealership for repairs/diagnosis.  They want me to leave the truck with them until they can try to figure it out.  Not practical for me because they don't have a loaner available.  Maybe I should just be glad that it's all warrantied?  Really sucks to have such a nice new truck with such substantial issues. 

  • Sad 1
Posted

That's BS and I hate that most dealers have no loaners now due to the shortage in chips/supply of cars.

Did they at least say how long a "diagnosis" would take? Like they would get on it right away or in a week. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, John813 said:

That's BS and I hate that most dealers have no loaners now due to the shortage in chips/supply of cars.

Did they at least say how long a "diagnosis" would take? Like they would get on it right away or in a week. 

Based on how quickly they got the first repair done, I would say they could get to work on it pretty quickly.  Fortunately the dealership and employees that I've been working with there have been great.  0 complaints from me for them.  But at this point I'll just keep running it.  Maybe it breaks again, maybe it lasts.  Maybe I'll see what a trade looks like.  Not totally sure what to do yet.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Does anybody know if GM has a new part number for the lifters that keep failing?  Or are they just replacing the lifters with more of the same type?  If they are the same part number as the failed ones, then GM has no clue what is going on.  That's what I suspect, they have no clue and are grasping at solutions.  Maybe the 6.2L being on constraint is them trying to actually FIX the problem instead of guessing at solutions.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Well, I purchased my 2015 sierra with the 6.2L new... I hoped that I would be one of the lucky ones that beat the odds...  NOPE...  I experienced the dreaded lifter failure yesterday with 78k miles on it.  The first look showed a bent push rod.  The GMC tech said that he thought the problem was caused by the VLOM... and quoted me $8000+ to repair it which included changing out both sides lifters.  Of course the dealership refuses to do the DOD delete...  so I am in the process of lining up an independent shop to do the full DOD delete for $5300.

 

Bottom line... there is no consensus on what is causing all of these lifter failures.  While my knee jerk reaction is to blame a poor quality lifter, the lifter manufacturer is pointing fingers at the block manufacturer saying that there are bad dimensions of the lifter cylinder, a malfunctioning VLOM, and oil pressure being outside the required window... who knows!

 

All I know is that I'm stuck with this thing and now I have to fix it... given the likelihood that my cam is trashed, it makes sense to me to do a full on DOD delete...  

 

 

Posted
18 hours ago, billghsv said:

Well, I purchased my 2015 sierra with the 6.2L new... I hoped that I would be one of the lucky ones that beat the odds...  NOPE...  I experienced the dreaded lifter failure yesterday with 78k miles on it.  The first look showed a bent push rod.  The GMC tech said that he thought the problem was caused by the VLOM... and quoted me $8000+ to repair it which included changing out both sides lifters.  Of course the dealership refuses to do the DOD delete...  so I am in the process of lining up an independent shop to do the full DOD delete for $5300.

 

Bottom line... there is no consensus on what is causing all of these lifter failures.  While my knee jerk reaction is to blame a poor quality lifter, the lifter manufacturer is pointing fingers at the block manufacturer saying that there are bad dimensions of the lifter cylinder, a malfunctioning VLOM, and oil pressure being outside the required window... who knows!

 

All I know is that I'm stuck with this thing and now I have to fix it... given the likelihood that my cam is trashed, it makes sense to me to do a full on DOD delete...  

 

 

sorry about what happened the more and more im reading about this make me want to cancel my at4, what kind of oil you use in your truck ?,thanks,

Posted
On 6/10/2022 at 1:01 PM, PacksAWallop said:

Based on how quickly they got the first repair done, I would say they could get to work on it pretty quickly.  Fortunately the dealership and employees that I've been working with there have been great.  0 complaints from me for them.  But at this point I'll just keep running it.  Maybe it breaks again, maybe it lasts.  Maybe I'll see what a trade looks like.  Not totally sure what to do yet.

Any updates?

Posted
On 8/20/2022 at 9:06 PM, NE18 said:

Any updates?

So far so good.  Have put another 4,500 miles on, and seems to be functioning normally.  The issues it was having previously have somehow disappeared.  Not sure how that happens in a mechanical system?  I won't complain.  The truck is a little bit noisy at the engine on start up.  Sounds like something along the accessory belt?  Water pump, alternator, something?  But that's probably to be expected after having the engine torn apart.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hey all,

I have a 2021 sierra 1500 at4 and I am at 39k miles currently. It is now in the shop for the second time with lifter failure and will be over 60 days of it in shop when its finally fixed.

I have been told by numerous people who work on GMC, including a couple people at the dealership it is currently sitting at, that the lifters are known to be defective and can reasonably expect failure every 20k miles.

My first experience with the dealer was absolutely terrible as they tried to have me do useless maintenance at 10k miles a week after an oil change where everything was green. I also had copies of the service bulletins saying that this was most likely lifter failure and it should be the first thing that was looked at, I was told by the manager of the repair shop that I should take it somewhere else if I wanted to tell them how to do there job. It took 29 days to get it fixed and was returned to me twice with nothing fixed and the issue being persistent, only to work perfectly 1 day before the lemon law kicked in for me as well as a bunch of promises from GM head quarters that were not kept.

The second time happened a week and a half ago. I was heading 2 hours away for work and started hearing a clicking from the engine and loss of RPMs, about 2-300 when the click happened, but no engine light or electrical issues like the first time. I called the same dealer that repaired it the first time, I know it was stupid, but was told if "no engine lights are on they cant take it in under warranty cause they cant get error codes". I went straight to Napa, tested for codes and had none. I went to the nearest GMC dealer which was in town and they immediately said it was not able to be driven. It is now sitting there waiting for parts that are on back order cause this seems to be a common problem with 2018 or newer trucks.

LONG STORY SHORT, my family has had GMC since I can remember and they have lost a life long customer. I love the truck, but the effor GM is putting into solving the problem is none if any at all. They just warrenty it for 5 years of 60000k miles and act like they are doing us a service.

I have yet to receive compensation for the time lost or answers from them about how they are solving the problem instead of just replacing defective parts with more defective parts.

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...