Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Looking at getting the 4.5" zone lift. Going to run 34 or 35's. I was curious if anyone has any pictures or experience. Have done my fair share of research and read I will also need spacers on the rear. 

4.5 is cutting it, if you want to run 20s. I have the 6.5 zone and installed it myself. I am running 35x12.50x 20 toyo MTs with 0 offset. I added bds leaf to my rear end and Fox full coilovers with reservoirs and a 2” spacers to bump me up more. Upgraded my UCA to Cognito. Before fox, I ran Bilstein and loved them.

9660378a1f2a252ee743bf2b73d79657.jpg
  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, 15KSChevy said:

I have a zone 4.5 with 33s. Me and my brother installed it over a weekend. Have no issues so far rides nearly the same as stock maybe a tad stiffer. I have bora 2 inch spacers in rear looks identical to front looking down front of truck. Wheels are 18x9 -12 offset

254B4216-A6A3-488B-80DA-D9D947978CB9.jpeg

Awesome looking ride! So you run spacers on just the back? How have they been? You have any additional pics?

 

3 hours ago, Aboogie808 said:


4.5 is cutting it, if you want to run 20s. I have the 6.5 zone and installed it myself. I am running 35x12.50x 20 toyo MTs with 0 offset. I added bds leaf to my rear end and Fox full coilovers with reservoirs and a 2” spacers to bump me up more. Upgraded my UCA to Cognito. Before fox, I ran Bilstein and loved them.

9660378a1f2a252ee743bf2b73d79657.jpg

Yeah I have 20 inch AllTerrain rims. I've seen two guys running the 4.5" Zone with 35's but they never said if they had rear spacers or not. Sweet ride man!

Posted (edited)
On 4/4/2020 at 8:37 PM, NorEaster said:

Awesome looking ride! So you run spacers on just the back? How have they been? You have any additional pics?

 

Yeah I have 20 inch AllTerrain rims. I've seen two guys running the 4.5" Zone with 35's but they never said if they had rear spacers or not. Sweet ride man!

If you don’t mind cutting a chunk out of the steel part of your bumper and hammering in the lower part of the rear of your front fenders you can definitely put 35’s on a 4.5 knuckle lift.. on a stock rim was zero offset you’re gonna have a little bit better chance with the turning radius but still it’s gonna take some alterations.

Edited by CovetedStyle
Posted
On 8/14/2019 at 8:01 AM, nathanj485 said:

Not a big fan of stuffing the wheel wells. Seems counterintuitive to having a lift kit, especially if you plan on off roading where clearance is important. You don’t want to be scraping the bottom of your truck on tree branches and rocks and the more clearance you have, the deeper water you can tread without worrying about flooding your exhaust.  I run a 6inch BDS with Fox 2.0s. 20x10 Fuels. 35x12.50 Nitto Ridge.

0DA1E144-6CB5-4D55-A9B2-FAE284222905.jpeg

Sweet looking ride man! Whats your setup?

  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, NorEaster said:

Sweet looking ride man! Whats your setup?

6 inch BDS. 20x10 Fuel Sledge. 35x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grappler. And thanks ?

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, NorEaster said:

Anyone here running 35s in a 5.3 without regearing?

I’m , running 35” tires  with 3:42 gears and a 6” lift.

Posted
Anyone here with a 5.3 running 35s without regearing?
I'm on stock gears in my 6.2. the 8 speed seems to make up for it.
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, NorEaster said:

Anyone here with a 5.3 running 35s without regearing?

I'm running 37's on a 9" McGaughys with my 5.3 3.42's

It's not as bad as everyone makes it sound. It gets down the road just fine.

Half of those guys are running stock trucks so they really are just going by what they heard.

Sure it could use some 4.10-4.56 gears but I'm not racing anyone so I really don't care.

IMG_20200408_110500.jpg

Edited by dieselfan1
  • Like 4
Posted
On 4/4/2020 at 4:50 PM, NorEaster said:

Looking at getting the 4.5" zone lift. Going to run 34 or 35's. I was curious if anyone has any pictures or experience. Have done my fair share of research and read I will also need spacers on the rear. 

Love my Zone... 

20190317_150715.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, NorEaster said:

Anyone here with a 5.3 running 35s without regearing?

All day, 35s on 22s

20190427_153754 (2).jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

Looking at the various lifts in the 4"-4.5" range, they all seem to require either cutting out the crossmember completely, or some form of cutting it.  Doesn't that weaken the heck out of the frame?

Posted
1 hour ago, EDL said:

Looking at the various lifts in the 4"-4.5" range, they all seem to require either cutting out the crossmember completely, or some form of cutting it.  Doesn't that weaken the heck out of the frame?

It's just a small chunk of the pocket where the lower control arm mounts. The new crossmember supplied with the lift is where the LCA is relocated. The small piece that is removed is to allow clearance for the front differential to be dropped. The replacement crossmember is much beefier then the one removed.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,668 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...