Jump to content

Leveled 2014 vs. Factory 2014 suspension.


Recommended Posts

Posted

I've had so many vehicles with lowered suspension and I can guarantee you that just lowering shackles will NOT change the ride quality. I had a 3/5 drop on my 2012 F150 and the ride was no different from stock since it was done correctly.

Posted

Those rims are 22's according to the tires. With that little of sidewall, it is going to be rough. It probably has nothing to do with the suspension. I don't even like 20's, I prefer to stick with 18's so that I have sidewall to flex and absorb some bumps. Of course that is just my opinion :)

Posted

OP have you checked the air pressure in the tires? I bought a 2012 F150 and it had factory 18's but part of my deal was for them to throw on the FX2 20" wheels. When I drove the truck for the first few days it rode like shit, come to find out it had over 60-70 psi in all 4 tires, brought them down to 32 and rode perfect. I would check just in case. In my experience 22" wheels with that size tire shouldn't ride like shit. That would mean all the trucks you see now days with factory 22" wheels "ride like shit"

  • 1 month later...
Posted
I am looking to get a 2 inch level kit with duratrac 285/60/20 on stock wheels. Can someone give me some advice or let me know if they have seen this set-up before?


Will I need to get wheel spacers? What level kit do you recommend. I wanna try to keep the cost low. Thanks again!

Posted

UPDATE:

 

Thanks guys for all of the responses. Here is what has happened since then:

 

So I went to another Chevy Dealer and they looked the truck over. Seems as if they added a few things that were aftermarket. The leveling kit, the tires and rims being the main culprits. So i went back to MY dealer and told them "fix the truck and put it back to its factory settings or I want a new truck".

 

They fixed the truck, gave me new tires and rims and I'm happy!

 

Lesson:

 

STAY ON YOUR DEALER... if you dont like what you purchased don't hesitate to bug them until they do what you want them to. I was lucky to have a dealership that would work with me and provide okay service. I say 'okay' because its January and i've been bugging them since late November.

Posted

Those rims are 22's according to the tires. With that little of sidewall, it is going to be rough. It probably has nothing to do with the suspension. I don't even like 20's, I prefer to stick with 18's so that I have sidewall to flex and absorb some bumps. Of course that is just my opinion :)

My 22's have a 4" sidewall , stock LSAs 20's are roughly 4.75. Pretty decent sidewall IMO.

Posted

To the OP: did they still charge extra for the leveling kit and aftermarket rims and tires? Didn't you test drive the truck before purchase?

Posted

UPDATE:

 

Thanks guys for all of the responses. Here is what has happened since then:

 

So I went to another Chevy Dealer and they looked the truck over. Seems as if they added a few things that were aftermarket. The leveling kit, the tires and rims being the main culprits. So i went back to MY dealer and told them "fix the truck and put it back to its factory settings or I want a new truck".

 

 

They fixed the truck, gave me new tires and rims and I'm happy!

 

Lesson:

 

STAY ON YOUR DEALER... if you dont like what you purchased don't hesitate to bug them until they do what you want them to. I was lucky to have a dealership that would work with me and provide okay service. I say 'okay' because its January and i've been bugging them since late November.

 

Did the dealer install all the aftermarket parts AFTER you test drove the truck and purchased it without your knowledge?

Or did you test drive it with all the aftermarket parts installed and choose to purchase the truck anyway?

 

Sounds like the dealer did you a huge favor.

Posted

Did the dealer install all the aftermarket parts AFTER you test drove the truck and purchased it without your knowledge?

Or did you test drive it with all the aftermarket parts installed and choose to purchase the truck anyway?

 

Sounds like the dealer did you a huge favor.

 

Unless they adjusted the price, they got their extra mark up and put back on all the OEM parts that came off lol!!!

Posted

 

Unless they adjusted the price, they got their extra mark up and put back on all the OEM parts that came off lol!!!

Lol that would such

 

Unless they adjusted the price, they got their extra mark up and put back on all the OEM parts that came off lol!!!

Lol that would suck

  • 1 year later...
Posted

New here, I have a 2015 silverado CCSB and have the rough country 2/4 drop kit ordered but if anyone has this installed I am wondering what drop block is needed to be EXACTLY level.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...