Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just like any other truck that puts up with salt from the winter roads or lives by an ocean breeze. It is a 12-13 year old truck after all.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the main problem is what they put on the roads in the winter combined with owners not doing some kind of rust preventative each year. My trucks frame is still solid for a used 230k mile truck, but I had to do the maintenance on it to get it back to good shape. I think a few more years of it being left go would have made it a lost cause.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I've got a similar problem with my 2003 2500 4WD Suburban. I've had numerous issues with it - all I believe related to rust. I've had to replace brake lines, the rear bumper is rusted out - the frame is really rusty - etc.

 

Since Chevy doesn't even make a 2500 series Suburban any more - I've got a quandary on my hands, because I really anticipate needing to have the services of a truck like this for the next 20 years or so. I only drive it maybe 5-6000 miles a year at best - but when I need it - I need it.

 

The way I see it - I have a few options:

 

1) Do a restoration on this truck. The body itself is in pretty good shape. It's really the undercarriage and frame that need attention. I'm thinking that pulling the body off and doing a full frame resto - or even getting a new frame (somebody actually has one available locally for $2k) - and then carefully prepping, painting and rustproofing that new frame with an eye towards longevity - might give me a truck that will last for a good many years to come

 

2) Selling this truck and picking up a later year GMT800 2500 series Suburban with low miles (I've seen a few for sale with as little as 30k) - and then carefully prep that to ward off rust.

 

3) Go to a GMT900 2500 series Suburban and try to get to it before it gets rusty.

 

Question: has anybody here removed the body from the frame on one of these trucks - is it a huge pain in the butt job?

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

My 03 still looks decent somehow, But the previous owner of my 99 must not of washed it or undercoated it at all...

 

 

100_2024.jpg

 

100_2026.jpg

 

100_2025.jpg

 

But I fixed it better than new...

 

100_2035.jpg

 

100_2031.jpg

 

100_2037.jpg

 

Later this summer I plan on parking it fr a bit and going over it with a sandblaster and coating it all with chassis saver, I will also use Fluid film fr the rest of the trucks life.

  • Like 2
Posted

My 2006 was pretty bad at 230k. Mainly just surface rust, not to much came off in chunks.

 

attachicon.gifIMG_20140802_201551051.jpg

This is how my 2000 looked. The 04 is spotless
Posted

I am not impressed with the "look" of my frame. i have an annual rust check service done and have a full warranty with them. the wax was peeling starting in 2012. i used to spray rust check black paint to help keep it protected. i had installed in the fall of 2013 a gm wheel well protector. we have bad witness here, but my truck gets rinsed off daily. that is right daily. i also gets hand washed several times a week. still when i am under neath, i have concerns with keeping this truck long term. but it is what it is. in fact i figure i wash it so much, that i have caused my dash board to crack!!!!! :)

Posted (edited)

Sorry to hear, but did you ever undercoat it? We Krown (rust control) our 2004 every year, after a thorough bath in the spring. All cross members were dripping with oil after the Krown was sprayed. Traded the 04 off last week, frame was solid.

 

My 2011 will be getting the same treatment.

Edited by WilliamBos
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Figured this was a good thread to post this in.

 

I just found out about this place yesterday from somebody on another forum.

 

Co. is located in Rhode Island and specializes in frame rust repair and vehicle rustproofing.

 

https://www.autorust.com/in-house-service/

 

The guy who sent me the info - said he had a car done by them about 20 years ago and the thing is still on the road and going strong.

 

 

  • 6 months later...
Posted

My 03 still looks decent somehow, But the previous owner of my 99 must not of washed it or undercoated it at all...

 

 

100_2024.jpg

 

100_2026.jpg

 

100_2025.jpg

 

But I fixed it better than new...

 

100_2035.jpg

 

100_2031.jpg

 

100_2037.jpg

 

Later this summer I plan on parking it fr a bit and going over it with a sandblaster and coating it all with chassis saver, I will also use Fluid film fr the rest of the trucks life.

 

 

I noticed the replacement cross member tube is straight tubing versus the obvious curve in the factory tube. Doesn't the straight tube cause the gas tank to sit down in back at an angle? I am just preparing to do the same repair to my 1999 Silverado and it would sure be a lot simpler to use a straight tube instead of fabricating one with a curve.

 

MichaelJT

Posted

From what I've heard is keeping your vehicle in a garage. Especially if it is heated can speed up the corrosion process.

 

I keep my trucks in my heated garage and don't have any issues

Posted (edited)

tubes and box beams... gone like the 1940s.

I love welding, had to learn a lot. subaru played with tubes in the 80s... non-stop fail.

 

If you can rid of amperage, the anode attraction will stop.

 

Salt is not the issue. You attract salt to a steel breakdown? you got uranium, outer space, somebodies septic tank, a city drain cover, beach sand, and whatver we let out of our backsides.

 

the frame needs an "out" to stay alive, not an "in."

 

LED lighted trucks are going to leave the new wimpy trucks called strong.. even though they are no different.

 

Real shame. I just browsed photos of 2 cylinder boxer trucks from the turn of the 18th century... 10000 times the wieght of the engine on flexing c-rails and solid tires. All .Day. Long.

 

GM ought to be embarassed today.

 

I took in the last of the old c-rails, already did my crude welding. it was in great shape. 19 years, 350k. It did hve an atomic event to get through it all.. should have expected bizarre anyway.

 

 

the spare tire is another catalyst, until the silicon blended years.. that is actually not all that old ya know. maybe 10-15 years ago before the real good stuff came out.

 

 

kudos to that welding, it is well worth it for the trucks. Don't be afraid of the ugly steel.

Edited by barry G
Posted

 

 

I noticed the replacement cross member tube is straight tubing versus the obvious curve in the factory tube. Doesn't the straight tube cause the gas tank to sit down in back at an angle? I am just preparing to do the same repair to my 1999 Silverado and it would sure be a lot simpler to use a straight tube instead of fabricating one with a curve.

 

MichaelJT

Good eye...The tank is unnoticeably lower, You would literally have to measure it to tell a difference. But that being said where you will notice a difference is with your gas tank strap bolt. I used a threaded rod and a nut instead to make it easier. If you want I can take a picture of it all back together so you can see how it looks.

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the reply. I figured it would have to be that way. What is it about the straight tube that necessitates the threaded rod and nut?

 

I used threaded rod and a nut to attach tank strap in my former 2000 Silverado but that was just because the spring nut broke and I had to drill it out. I made my own T-nut for the top out of steel bar stock. A matter of using what i had on hand.

 

I have my 1999 apart now and and I am beginning the repairs to the rusted portions of the crossmembers. There is very little detailed documentation on the web for this particular repair and yours is among the best.

 

Please post the picture here as I am sure it would benefit others besides me.

 

Thanks!

MichaelJT

Edited by MichaelJT
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Well, I know why you needed the threaded rod and nut. The strap is actually too short to reach the bracket. I fixed it by modifying the strap to be longer there and that fixed it. The strap had already been cobbled together because of rust by the previous owner and i just cut out that shoddy work and made it the correct length. Lots of work replacing all those cross members and gussets but very satisfying. I'm ready for another 16 years now.

 

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

 

MichaelJT

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...