Jump to content

Leveling Kit for 2015 Sierra Denali Magnetic Ride

skibum823
 Share

Recommended Posts

ikaika1984 Enthusiast

ikaika1984

Posted
Posted

 

There is still about 3/4" to 1" rake, depending on how much fuel in tank. I don't tow much, but I don't know how much tongue weight it would take to absorb that 1" rake. I had over 300 lbs behind the rear axle in the bed with 4 adults in the cab this weekend and it didn't budge. I "might" tow a motorcycle once every couple years, but that's about it so I didn't give too much concern to towing.

 

Hope my answer was useful in some way.

 

Regards,

Lou

Yes you did Lou. Thank you, and you have a very nice truck

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

  • Replies 345
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Treyb2570
Treyb2570

Just recently did my 2015 Sierra Denali with the suspension maxx kit. Had my dealer install kit, tires I brought, and aligned the front end for just over $500 parts and labor. Looks awesome and rides

Ten4Lou
Ten4Lou

Just for info....   This weekend, had dealer install 2.5" SuspensionMaxx front level and then new KO2 305/55/20. Running 39 psi front and 35 psi rear. Quiet on hwy and no rubbing. Not sure what the

Je_suis_prest
Je_suis_prest

Love the stance buddy. I have the same leveling kit. Went with 305 45 22 G2's.

Posted Images

Ten4Lou Enthusiast

Ten4Lou

Posted
Posted

Yes you did Lou. Thank you, and you have a very nice truck

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

 

Likewise! I actually like the color of yours better than mine. My 2014 Sierra was the WDT. Looks awesome and ALWAYS looks clean, even when it's dirty, LOL! This Iridium shows the pollen dust worse than black!

  • Like 1
Ten4Lou Enthusiast

Ten4Lou

Posted
Posted (edited)

You went with the full 2.5" level option to make it even Lou? I ask because I have a 2015 Denali and am looking for this exact setup. I had been eyeing the 275/60R20 BFGs but if the 305s work on the stock rims I'll be looking at those.

 

 

Yes, I had them use all of upper spacers. I don't think it actually made a 2.5" difference. More like 2.38". It fluctuates depending on how much fuel is in tank.What I found interesting is the inconsistencies of fender heights in relation of front to rear and side to side. On the driver side, there's about a 0.75 - 1" rake and on passenger side is more like a .80 - 1.10" rake. Could be that I have more tools and equipment stored on the driver side of vehicle?

 

I've even noticed fender height inconsistencies between different brand new sierras while walking around the new car lots. Sometimes I measured 2WD Sierras with exact same wheels and tires measuring "higher" than some Z71 4WD Sierras? So many small factors and nuances make each truck sit and drive a little different.

 

The main reason I went with SuspensionMaxx is that is the only kit my dealer was comfortable installing, especially where the Magneride was concerned. I can tell the Magneride sensors are just right because the truck still holds level in the turns but also loosens up on straight smooth roads. I'm still experimenting with air pressure. Even thought these tires are pretty quiet for an All Terrain, I'm still trying to get used to the stiffer ride of such a heavy tire. I definitely have noticed a little power loss at take-off and a little more applied braking needed with the additional weight of these tires. The truck seems to have lost a little bit of its nimbleness. It's a trade-off I suppose of much better (tougher) looks and higher stance at the sacrifice of performance and comfort.

 

Didn't mean to rattle on...just my experience so far.

 

******

Edited because I think the dealership that installed the level kit may have filled my tank up with 87 octane fuel. The truck was empty when I brought it to them and full when I picked it up. I suppose they were trying to be nice. I won't know until I refuel but that may be why I'm noticing a sluggishness in the 6.2. Or it may just be from these new heavy tires. I'll report back

 

******

 

Regards,

Lou

Edited by Ten4Lou
Ten4Lou Enthusiast

Ten4Lou

Posted
Posted (edited)

Following up to my previous post... I had a chance fill up the tank with 93 octane this week and the truck pepped back up again. Not as peppy as it was before the bigger, heavier tires. But not as much power loss as I first experienced on the last tank. I'm convinced that the dealership filled up my tank with 87 octane last week.

That being said, there is still a noticeable performance loss with these heavier tires, just not as bad as I first thought.

 

Regards,

Lou

Edited by Ten4Lou
ikaika1984 Enthusiast

ikaika1984

Posted
Posted

 

Likewise! I actually like the color of yours better than mine. My 2014 Sierra was the WDT. Looks awesome and ALWAYS looks clean, even when it's dirty, LOL! This Iridium shows the pollen dust worse than black!

Thanks man, but you know I wish I would've waited for a darker color. I guess I like the way it pops off when she's all shined up...

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
16denali Enthusiast

16denali

Posted
Posted

I've got about 4,000 miles on my 2016 Sierra Denali with the Suspension Maxx level kit. Zero issues. It's on 20x9 with zero offset and 295/55/20 Toyo M/Ts. Also (in the last pic) I took the snow plow air dam off the front. Looks 10x better without it. IMO

 

 

post-155916-0-32793900-1458233918_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-97685200-1458233927_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-61408500-1458234111_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-32793900-1458233918_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-97685200-1458233927_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-61408500-1458234111_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-32793900-1458233918_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-97685200-1458233927_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-61408500-1458234111_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-32793900-1458233918_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-97685200-1458233927_thumb.jpg

post-155916-0-61408500-1458234111_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
ikaika1984 Enthusiast

ikaika1984

Posted
Posted

I've got about 4,000 miles on my 2016 Sierra Denali with the Suspension Maxx level kit. Zero issues. It's on 20x9 with zero offset and 295/55/20 Toyo M/Ts. Also (in the last pic) I took the snow plow air dam off the front. Looks 10x better without it. IMO

 

 

Rides smooth just like the first day?

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

Denali62 Enthusiast

Denali62

Posted
Posted (edited)

I am running the 2.5 suspensionmaxx kit and their 1" block in the rear on 285/55 20 ko2's

 

No rubbing and still has enough rake to tow.

post-153651-0-58842200-1458255277_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-25035000-1458255366_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-58842200-1458255277_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-25035000-1458255366_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-58842200-1458255277_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-25035000-1458255366_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-58842200-1458255277_thumb.jpeg

post-153651-0-25035000-1458255366_thumb.jpeg

Edited by Denali62
  • Like 2
ikaika1984 Enthusiast

ikaika1984

Posted
Posted

Rides exactly the same other than the difference with the tires.

So tires wise. The ride is a little rough, as in feeling the nobies?

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

16denali Enthusiast

16denali

Posted
Posted

So tires wise. The ride is a little rough, as in feeling the nobies?

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

Correct. Going from my Goodyear Eagle street tires to a M/T is a little bit different tread pattern. LOL. Still wouldn't change a thing though.

  • Like 1
ikaika1984 Enthusiast

ikaika1984

Posted
Posted

Correct. Going from my Goodyear Eagle street tires to a M/T is a little bit different tread pattern. LOL. Still wouldn't change a thing though.

Thanks a lot. I have a 2015 Denali and can't wait to do this mod.... Nice job.

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

6D9 Matt Enthusiast

6D9 Matt

Posted
Posted

I installed the 2" suspension maxx kit and couldn't be happier. Don't feel any difference in ride quality.

  • Like 1
Je_suis_prest Enthusiast

Je_suis_prest

Posted
Posted

I installed the 2" suspension maxx kit and couldn't be happier. Don't feel any difference in ride quality.

Why did u only do the 2" instead of the full 2.5"?

6D9 Matt Enthusiast

6D9 Matt

Posted
Posted

Because I didn't want it fully level. I like a little bit of rake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • StingerZ16
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By StingerZ16 · Posted

      Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • revmanii
      Starting a new thread regarding mounting my 2014 OEM wheels to my 2026

      By revmanii · Posted

      The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...