Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

AgDoctor Senior Enthusiast

AgDoctor

Posted
Posted

Just installed the 5100's on the front of my 17 with a Zone 4.5. I set them to stock height. I changed the rears a few weeks back. I used the strut tower on top of them.

This was a good upgrade, which is sad that a set of shocks with 5,500 miles in visibly good shape and rode that poorly. When I say poor ride I mean that Rancho has no decent uptravel control. The on pavement ride was ok, but the Bilsteins are better.

This wasn't a night and day difference for me, but definitely worth the mod.


Sent via Morse code

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

300 Blackout Enthusiast

300 Blackout

Posted
Posted
I suppose I should have asked, will the truck ride just as well on the stock setting as it would on the lifted levels? 

 

I just wondered if the lighter/lifted settings preload the springs more than on the stock setting? 

 

Seems I keep getting different opinions, so I'm second guessing everything lol

 

I have the Bilstein 5100 Ride Height adjustable shocks installed on the 3rd setting (2nd highest) and my truck is almost perfectly level. Only the most critical of observers would notice a very slight forward rake.

 

I really don’t like the look of a truck with a higher front than back and of all the trucks I’ve seen with 5100s on the highest setting, the front is just a bit above level.

 

Regarding the spring compression, quality of the ride and installing spacers, the thread below has a lot of useful info. I cannot comment if the truck rides as well on the stock setting as the third because I’ve never had the Bilsteins on the stock setting. Compared to the Rancho shocks on the stock setting vs the Bilsteins on the third, the Bilsteins ride much better.

 

https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/183204-consequences-of-a-15-level-lift-on-a-sierrasilverado-1500/

  • Like 1
jgraves13 Enthusiast

jgraves13

Posted
Posted
So are the 6112's a lost cause now?


Talked to a Bilstein rep at the Offroad expo in Pomona this weekend. They have them tested on the 5.3, and should be releasing "soon". They were surprised when they didn't pull up in the website


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kennerz Enthusiast

kennerz

Posted
Posted

I called them two weeks ago (they are close to my work). Guy said this fall. (fall is now) so don't know. need shocks and need 2" lift to run 33's. Want a premium shock and the only other (more expensive) good option seems to be the Icons. I really want a shock with a larger body and 5/8 shaft. Not enough positive reviews on King or fox entry level 2.5's and longevity. 

 

Bilstein provides the best durability for DD, and they don't seem to loose performance much over time or miles in my experience where a King or Fox will need regular service to maintain performance (I read they recommend service intervals of 30k mi or so). 

roadblock Enthusiast

roadblock

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, kennerz said:

I called them two weeks ago (they are close to my work). Guy said this fall. (fall is now) so don't know. need shocks and need 2" lift to run 33's. Want a premium shock and the only other (more expensive) good option seems to be the Icons. I really want a shock with a larger body and 5/8 shaft. Not enough positive reviews on King or fox entry level 2.5's and longevity. 

 

Bilstein provides the best durability for DD, and they don't seem to loose performance much over time or miles in my experience where a King or Fox will need regular service to maintain performance (I read they recommend service intervals of 30k mi or so). 

Agreed, i was looking into the Fox 2.0 and 2.5's and neither of them seem to have very good reviews. I find it a bit weird the 2019's are a new platform and they still don't have the 6112's for the 2014-2018 trucks, fingers crossed! 

Mileguru Enthusiast

Mileguru

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, kennerz said:

I called them two weeks ago (they are close to my work). Guy said this fall. (fall is now) so don't know. need shocks and need 2" lift to run 33's. Want a premium shock and the only other (more expensive) good option seems to be the Icons. I really want a shock with a larger body and 5/8 shaft. Not enough positive reviews on King or fox entry level 2.5's and longevity. 

 

Bilstein provides the best durability for DD, and they don't seem to loose performance much over time or miles in my experience where a King or Fox will need regular service to maintain performance (I read they recommend service intervals of 30k mi or so). 

See what you think about this kit.

https://www.halolifts.com/GMC_c_149.html

churchy1313 Enthusiast

churchy1313

Posted
Posted (edited)

I run the Rancho RS9000 series on my vehicles.  They are an adjustable shock that is very durable. I had a set on my 06 Jeep Rubicon that I trailed  a lot. Shocks never gave me an issue and rode much better than stock.

I had a set on my 12 GMC 2500 after adding a Zone lift to it. The Zone shocks rode really bad.

Added the Rancho RS 9000's and it literally was a night/day differnce and then some!

 

I rode in a truck that has Bilstein shocks.  To me the Rancho RS9000's rode a lot better.

Edited by churchy1313
Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, churchy1313 said:

I run the Rancho RS9000 series on my vehicles.  They are an adjustable shock that is very durable. I had a set on my 06 Jeep Rubicon that I trailed  a lot. Shocks never gave me an issue and rode much better than stock.

I had a set on my 12 GMC 2500 after adding a Zone lift to it. The Zone shocks rode really bad.

Added the Rancho RS 9000's and it literally was a night/day differnce and then some!

 

I rode in a truck that has Bilstein shocks.  To me the Rancho RS9000's rode a lot better.

The 9000's are adjustable so they can be dampened down quite a bit.

Not much of a fair comparison with the 1 set valving of the 5100s

Longevity is questionable. The adjustment twist knobs on these do not seem to hold up well.

churchy1313 Enthusiast

churchy1313

Posted
Posted

Out of the 5 sets of the Ranchos I’ve had

i never had a problem with the knobs.

i had 2 sets for over 4 years with no issues.

on the Jeep, I turned the knobs a lot for different terrain, never had an issue.

im getting a pair of rear ones installed this week with a zone 4.5” lift

parshal Enthusiast

parshal

Posted
Posted

I apologize if this particular question has been answered but I've searched and searched and haven't found exactly what I'm looking for.  I'm running stock tire size and have no plans to run larger tires.  I put 5100's all around a couple weeks ago and love the ride at the stock setting for the front.  I came from a '09 Sierra that had more ground clearance than this '18.  I have 9" at the air dam and 10" to the step rails.  The dam on my '09 is in the backwoods somewhere and it was higher.  

 

I don't want a full 2" lift and am contemplating moving the fronts to the .75" or 1.25" setting and adding another inch to the rear.  I've seen numerous posts where the 1.25" setting is more like 1.5".  I've found two posts where the poster has theirs at the .75" setting.  One said it gave .75" and the other said 1".  If it's 1" I'll probably move to that setting.  I'd really like the 1.25" if that's what it really does.

kennerz Enthusiast

kennerz

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Mileguru said:

See what you think about this kit.

https://www.halolifts.com/GMC_c_149.html

They look promising, but not much history or info on Halo. From years of off road experience I found that it's best to go with the company with the best reputation for performance and quality(properly valved shocks combined with the right technology make a radical difference). I've seen enough on ICON to be convinced that they are legitimate and have a solid understanding on how to create a true high performance shock.

 

I'm a fan of King actually, just for the cost proposition of even the entry level fronts ($1600) from what I've seen. The added maintenance schedule, and no digressive valving for a mostly street truck with the occasional off road not sure they are the right fit for me. King quality is second to none, just everything I've seen with them (Buggies/utv's) always needs them re-valved or rebuilt after a season or two. Which is cool for a Hi performance toy, not a daily driver IMHO 

 

To me Bilsteins are kind of generic, but they provide a lot of value & as long as they don't leak seem to last much longer than any other shock I've seen( on cars I've mostly had Bilstein and Koni). I just want to buy once...

jgraves13 Enthusiast

jgraves13

Posted
Posted
They look promising, but not much history or info on Halo. From years of off road experience I found that it's best to go with the company with the best reputation for performance and quality(properly valved shocks combined with the right technology make a radical difference). I've seen enough on ICON to be convinced that they are legitimate and have a solid understanding on how to create a true high performance shock.
 
I'm a fan of King actually, just for the cost proposition of even the entry level fronts ($1600) from what I've seen. The added maintenance schedule, and no digressive valving for a mostly street truck with the occasional off road not sure they are the right fit for me. King quality is second to none, just everything I've seen with them (Buggies/utv's) always needs them re-valved or rebuilt after a season or two. Which is cool for a Hi performance toy, not a daily driver IMHO 
 
To me Bilsteins are kind of generic, but they provide a lot of value & as long as they don't leak seem to last much longer than any other shock I've seen( on cars I've mostly had Bilstein and Koni). I just want to buy once...



For a street driven truck they don't need to be rebuilt that often. Once every 60-70k miles would be fine unless you're coating the shafts with dirt/sand all the time. Which is exactly the reason they need to be rebuilt so often on an Offroad vehicle. Street vehicle, not so much


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 626 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • MrChips
      Road Master Active Suspension

      By MrChips · Posted

      Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • JimCost2014
      Transmission jumping out of gear while driving.

      By JimCost2014 · Posted

      Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Atlas
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Atlas · Posted

      Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...