Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

badfnz Enthusiast

badfnz

Posted
Posted

Here is where I stand but need some opinions. I currently have the stock Ranchos and a 2" level (below the shock only). I can:

 

1. Keep the level, and install 5100s on the bottom level. The problem with this is the 5100 is a longer shock so coupling this with the level is no bueno.

2. Lose the level and install 5100s on the highest level. This will give me about the same height, but having the shocks at the highest level preloads the springs, giving me a worse ride.

3. Keep the level and install 4600s. This will give me the same height and an improved ride with the Bilsteins over the Ranchos.

 

Choice 3 seems obvious to me but am I thinking choice 2 correctly? Does the ride get worse as you raise the spring bases up? I've read on here that it does but since the whole point of raising the spring bases is to raise the truck, I'd think the spring should have the same preload on it no matter the level.

 

Halp?

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

Dana Mills Enthusiast

Dana Mills

Posted
Posted

I'm running option 2 - the ride is a vast improvement over the stock Ranchos. The only time you will increase preload is if the shock absorber is topped out and cannot extend any further, thus limiting the distance between the top plate and the perch. This doesn't appear to be the case on the Z71, at least its not apparent to me.

 

If there is still room for the shock to extend with the perch used, the overall length of the whole assembly will simply increase instead of adding to the preload of the shock, thus leaving the weight of the vehicle as the only source of preload.

 

It is like the difference between the two types of spacer lifts. a coil spacer will usually achieve the top out of the shock and so preload the coil. A top plate spacer does not preload the coil, but merely extends the length of the strut. The 5100's simply do this at the other end of the strut.

 

That being said, if you use a long enough coil with the 5100's to achieve top out of the shock on the perch you are using, you will begin to preload the coil and that preload will increase with every perch you move up.

 

Here is where I stand but need some opinions. I currently have the stock Ranchos and a 2" level (below the shock only). I can:

 

1. Keep the level, and install 5100s on the bottom level. The problem with this is the 5100 is a longer shock so coupling this with the level is no bueno.

2. Lose the level and install 5100s on the highest level. This will give me about the same height, but having the shocks at the highest level preloads the springs, giving me a worse ride.

3. Keep the level and install 4600s. This will give me the same height and an improved ride with the Bilsteins over the Ranchos.

 

Choice 3 seems obvious to me but am I thinking choice 2 correctly? Does the ride get worse as you raise the spring bases up? I've read on here that it does but since the whole point of raising the spring bases is to raise the truck, I'd think the spring should have the same preload on it no matter the level.

 

Halp?

aaronarf Enthusiast

aaronarf

Posted
Posted

 

Great to hear!!

 

 

 

Thank you for the business!! These will be a nice upgrade over the stock gear.

 

 

We JUST got a new boatload of these shocks (50 units) but Im already down to just 12 pairs.

6848902c79bbb5a19fed26da7cc12c50.jpg

 

Super fast shipping, great prices. Thank you ! Highly recommend MRT.

 

They came in already...looking forward to installing them when I have some free time. Going to PM you on some wheel prices here in a little bit.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
tanner709 Enthusiast

tanner709

Posted
Posted

Here is where I stand but need some opinions. I currently have the stock Ranchos and a 2" level (below the shock only). I can:

 

1. Keep the level, and install 5100s on the bottom level. The problem with this is the 5100 is a longer shock so coupling this with the level is no bueno.

2. Lose the level and install 5100s on the highest level. This will give me about the same height, but having the shocks at the highest level preloads the springs, giving me a worse ride.

3. Keep the level and install 4600s. This will give me the same height and an improved ride with the Bilsteins over the Ranchos.

 

Choice 3 seems obvious to me but am I thinking choice 2 correctly? Does the ride get worse as you raise the spring bases up? I've read on here that it does but since the whole point of raising the spring bases is to raise the truck, I'd think the spring should have the same preload on it no matter the level.

 

Halp?

 

I've only heard one member say he's running a 2.5" level kit with bilsteins at the lowest setting but has a spectacular ride. I want the best ride but still achieve the 2-2.5" of lift - bilsteins are ordered.

 

more confused each day.

  • Like 2
Dana Mills Enthusiast

Dana Mills

Posted
Posted

A buddy of mine went with Bilsteins on the lowest setting combined with the ReadyLift leveling kit, which uses small spacers that sit at the bottom and top of the strut. It's more expensive than the RC kit but I like the way it's designed. My buddy's truck looks perfect - it has just under a 1/2 inch rake (not noticeable) and rides great. That said, I didn't see a major difference when driving his truck versus mine with only has the Bilsteins at the highest setting

 

 

 

I've only heard one member say he's running a 2.5" level kit with bilsteins at the lowest setting but has a spectacular ride. I want the best ride but still achieve the 2-2.5" of lift - bilsteins are ordered.

 

more confused each day.

Skeeter McSkeet Senior Enthusiast

Skeeter McSkeet

Posted
Posted

I got my set of billys on all four corners for a steal a couple years ago bc another member was running them with a spacer on top of them. Said the ride was horrible, took them off after less than a week. Adding a spacer with the billys above stock setting kind of defeats the purpose of them.

 

 

Sent from my kayak

brownclown01 Enthusiast

brownclown01

Posted
Posted

Just got a set for the front . Now I'm thinking I should be doing the rear at the same time. I don't want to raise the back should I still go with 5100s . Also read somewhere but can't fund it that maybe better to use a different model. I will be towing a travel trailer cross country this summer . Any recommendations? I think I read the maybe 5160s would be better?

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

aaronarf Enthusiast

aaronarf

Posted
Posted

Just got a set for the front . Now I'm thinking I should be doing the rear at the same time. I don't want to raise the back should I still go with 5100s . Also read somewhere but can't fund it that maybe better to use a different model. I will be towing a travel trailer cross country this summer . Any recommendations? I think I read the maybe 5160s would be better?

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

I would definitely do the rears too. I don't think they make any 5160s that are meant for stock ride height.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

tanner709 Enthusiast

tanner709

Posted
Posted

Anyone else have the bilsteins coupled with a level or spacer? Looking for feedback asap.

Ezekiel2517 Enthusiast

Ezekiel2517

Posted
Posted

I had 4600s on the front with a 1.5" level. It was terrible. Had it replaced with 5100s on third setting. Night and day difference.

 

If anyone in Houston wants some front 4600s that have less than 3000 miles on them, PM me.

cmatt Enthusiast

cmatt

Posted
Posted

I had 4600s on the front with a 1.5" level. It was terrible. Had it replaced with 5100s on third setting. Night and day difference.

 

If anyone in Houston wants some front 4600s that have less than 3000 miles on them, PM me.

Is that the 1.6" setting on the 5100s? How much did it lift the front? I need 1.5-2.0" on my Yukon.
tanner709 Enthusiast

tanner709

Posted
Posted

I had 4600s on the front with a 1.5" level. It was terrible. Had it replaced with 5100s on third setting. Night and day difference.

 

If anyone in Houston wants some front 4600s that have less than 3000 miles on them, PM me.

 

But do you know if it was the kit or the 4600s? Did you run either setup by themselves?

 

 

Is that the 1.6" setting on the 5100s? How much did it lift the front? I need 1.5-2.0" on my Yukon.

 

1st setting - 0"

2nd - 0.75"

3rd - 1.26"

4th - 1.85"

Sikk50 Enthusiast

Sikk50

Posted
Posted

Installed mine today at the highest setting. I also upgraded the stock 255/70r17 tires to 285/70r17 Nitto's

 

Before:

FD 38 1/4

FP 37 7/8

RD 38 1/4

RP 39 1/4

 

After:

FD 40 7/8

FP 41

RD 39 3/8

RP 40

 

646BC1A2-091F-477D-AE8F-8465F7109CE5_zps

  • Like 1
MRTMotorsports Enthusiast

MRTMotorsports

Posted
Posted

Truck looks great! Thanks for posting the before/after heights!

 

 

I would definitely do the rears too. I don't think they make any 5160s that are meant for stock ride height.

 

No, those are "supposed" to be released with the 6112s up front.

 

 

Anyone else have the bilsteins coupled with a level or spacer? Looking for feedback asap.

 

We dont recommend this, just use the preset heights on the Bilstein for the optimum ride.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,974
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Gilkey96
    Newest Member
    Gilkey96
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 788 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • garagerog
      Low fuel pressure after installing new fuel pump

      By garagerog · Posted

      Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Gilkey96
      Low fuel pressure after installing new fuel pump

      By Gilkey96 · Posted

      Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • diyer2
      AFM Experience

      By diyer2 · Posted

      I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • MORSNO
      Which 2027 engine will you choose?

      By MORSNO · Posted

      Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...