Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

...And who wants to pay $50k for a vehicle for 8 years? It'll be shot by then, especially since they don't focus on making the exterior hold up to anything anymore...

 

IMO it's a clever game of the car makers.

1. long terms of financing make a car "affordable" for almost everyone. No one has to save up money to buy a car. That makes it harder to...

2. ...sell your car private for cash to someone, because the remaining amount of the loan is higher than what one would get. So you'd have to...

3. ...go to the dealer again to have the convenience to get a new car and get rid of the old one while the remaining loan owed will be cleared with the new loan.

 

Win win for the car maker. He'll make money on the new car AND on the old one.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I'm not saying the luxury features are not nice. I drove older midsize GMs most my life up until my 07 Sierra now. I feel spoiled with the 5.3, power fold mirrors and blinkers along with the SLE-2 trim package, steering controls, etc. But, I also bought this truck with 140k on it knowing that it's seen some years of work and abuse. I paid $12k, around here... That's cheap even with the mileage.

 

Saying all that, would I give up those options above for a brand new silverado, roll windows, manual locks, 5.3 (with no AFM please), 4wd and extended cab for an extra $6k? ( assuming that GM could build and sell one for approx $18k out the door)

 

Hell yes I would, why?

 

-Piece of mind from a warranty.

-I could actually track maintenance from day one.

-The feeling of actually owning a brand new truck (which I'm imagining is quite nice)

 

Again, I think that there are a lot of guys with me on this. Not that I'm bagging on you folks who make the big bucks, but we don't all come to this forum and introduce a 2015-16 Silverado or Sierra.

 

I'm sure all of us wish we could. I believe if the big 3 made these poor man trucks marketable at under $20k...you would see a lot of guys saying screw the $15k used truck with 80k on it, I'll spend the extra $5k for a new one.

Posted

 

IMO it's a clever game of the car makers.

1. long terms of financing make a car "affordable" for almost everyone. No one has to save up money to buy a car. That makes it harder to...

2. ...sell your car private for cash to someone, because the remaining amount of the loan is higher than what one would get. So you'd have to...

3. ...go to the dealer again to have the convenience to get a new car and get rid of the old one while the remaining loan owed will be cleared with the new loan.

 

Win win for the car maker. He'll make money on the new car AND on the old one.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

And the only way to get lower payments is to take a significant drop in what your driving.

 

If you owe 50K on a truck that is worth 35K, the only way your coming out with cheaper payments is if you buy a Chevy Spark or something. Trouble is, now you add the 15K difference onto the 12K for the spark, and now your driving around in a Spark that you owe 27K on, but is now worth about 7K since you drove it off the lot.

 

That is why I always say, once you sign on the line, your stuck paying no matter what, whether you pay now, or later, or get another vehicle and carry debt over, either way, you will keep paying.

Posted

If people weren't buying them, they wouldn't make them.

 

But Bernie will fix this situation. He'll tax the crap out of everyone and "spread the wealth". Then maybe we can all get grey uniforms and 'feel the burn'.

Posted

Saw one at the Toronto Auto Show. Looks sweet in white. The best looking F150 of all of the new ones, as in, its the only good looking one. Needs a V8 though (damn Ford and their egoboost crap...)

Posted

At the LA Car Show in November

 

I'd probably buy one if they came with Crewcab & 6 1/2 ft beds and a V8.

 

DSC_3421%20Large_zpsmelljtsf.jpg

 

DSC_3423%20Large_zpsdyobvhf1.jpg

Posted

Love that blue.

I wouldn't mind a Camaro in that color. Reminds me of the blue used on 60's camaros.

Posted

 

 

It would be nice to have something offered for under $30K, but as long as everyone keeps shelling out $40k-$50k it'll never happen.

You mean, "as long as the average consumer keeps taking out 7+ year auto loans".

 

Don't worry, that bubble will burst sooner than later I expect.

Posted

You mean, "as long as the average consumer keeps taking out 7+ year auto loans".

 

Don't worry, that bubble will burst sooner than later I expect.

Haha that too! I'm with you on that. Eventually something is going to crash.

Posted

You mean, "as long as the average consumer keeps taking out 7+ year auto loans".

 

Don't worry, that bubble will burst sooner than later I expect.

 

Not really, someone who cant pay the note gets their car or truck taken back, it is not like a educational loan with 0 collateral for the bank to lean on or home loan which is nearly impossible to get squatters out even when they have not paid the bank for years!

 

Don't pay for 3 months on a auto note and the tow truck will take it back sooner rather then later and the bank will recoup most times the full amount owed when they sell it off. You will see either a housing again or educational loan bubble before we ever see issues regarding car loans.

Posted

You mean, "as long as the average consumer keeps taking out 7+ year auto loans".

 

Don't worry, that bubble will burst sooner than later I expect.

That kind of car/truck doesn't sell. People don't want basic vehicles. It's like how people in the US moaned about the BMW M5/6 being SMG only so BMW made manuals JUST for America. Then no one bought them. So they're gone again.

 

You can get basic vehicles still but dealers don't bother stocking them.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I guess it depends on the car, people were livid when Porsche said no more manual so they made two new models with manual only options and they are already sold out before they have even hit the production line

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...