Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Column shifter for me. Fords console shifter takes up too much valuable real estate. Don't care either way about push button start but keep the remote start.

Posted

Column...and keep the keyed ignition.

Agreed. I don't want to have to deal with a problem child junky push button ignition system when I eventually buy one of these trucks used down the road.

Posted

I vote column shift. Ram's twist knob just doesn't cut it for me. I hated it in my rental.

Posted

Column shifter and push button start. How it starts is at the bottom my list of priorities though.

 

There is no practical reason at all to prefer a keyed start, it has no advantages other than being the old way of doing things.

Posted

I say go with column still but make the shifter shorter. Like on the benzes etc.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I say go with column still but make the shifter shorter. Like on the benzes etc.

 

That's the ticket.......little shorter and boom! No way I see the Ram's keeping the dashboard knob! A Guy I work with is already saying nope it sucks!

Edited by mookdoc6
Posted

I had a 2015 F150 Lariat until a month ago. I am surprised to see that I am the first one to say that I really liked the floor shifter. It was a very comfortable place to rest my hand while underway. Intelligent entry and keyless ignition were great, for me, too.

 

The F150 had plenty of console storage for me, and I'm a contractor who drives from jobsite to jobsite all day.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Colum Shift or console shift if it's comfortable. I like the push button start and leaving the key in my pocket as well as auto entry, put this on the tailgate also.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Column shift is fine, I like the open console area free from driver controls.

 

Keyless (proximity) entry and push button start would be nice. I hate my keys banging around on the column.

Posted

Column shift and keyless entry with push button start get my vote.

  • Like 2
Posted

Despite how you glitz it up the basic vehicle design is a truck; and the basic truck is meant to do work.

 

So what, the farmer, plumber, electrician, roofer etc. who is trying to eek out a living is forced to spend extra bucks on a double or crew cab to transport his two helpers or fit his wife and child because he can't fit them into a basic cab due to a console taking up the third seating position?

 

The manufacturers have it right, keep the basic standard column shift and key start for those who need it or want it, and let those who want all the extra interior crap including keyless entry pay for it as an option.

 

And keyless entry and using electronics to simplify steering column architecture is fine, but I'll wager half the owners have no idea how to get into or start the vehicle once the battery goes dead in the keyfob. My neighbor was driving around with no idea that there is a hidden laser key in her fob, and the hidden access in the door handle for mechanical entry and that once inside you have to insert it into the special reader well to get the vehicle to recognize the dead keyfob.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Keep it exactly the way it is. Column shift makes for the epic center console, and it feels like I'm in a truck, not a car.

 

And keep the key. Push button just seems too insecure. That and keys are awesome.

Edited by CadillacLuke24
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Column shift and key here too. I could live with a floor shift but please don't give us that knob shifter..

  • Like 1
Posted

Yup, the knob or dial or whatever the idiots come up with and it would kill it for me.....Gosh, I get in my wife's car and I am constantly grabbing the air behind her steering wheel looking for a column shifter to back the damn car up? I can't do a knob, no way!

Posted

I've driven all of them and prefer the column shift but any of them work just fine. The console shifter is IMO a waste of space and too car like and while Ram's knob is weird, you get used to it after a day or two. I'd take it and Ram's nice center console over a Ford with a console shifter wasting all that space.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 3.19 @ Kroger’s in Montgomery Tx
    • We have now!  2027 GMC Sierra  Early look, but I'm a GMC guy and so far I think I like the looks of the Chevy better.
    • HD at the moment, are kinda their own deal.  How LTZ sells on those vs on 1500, there is a difference.   They are merging most of the mid trims on 1500.  LT, RST and LTZ are replaced by one trim, Silverado.  LT and RST are a BIG portion of sales.    Bad naming choice aside, the new Silverado trim will offer the spread of options that those three trims offered.  So expect to see things like the tech package for example, and memory seats.  And LT Trail Boss will now just be "Trail Boss" (formerly LT Trail Boss) but will offer content spread like the new Silverado trim will.  The press photos showed the Trail Boss (formerly LT Trail Boss) has access to Super Cruise now, which on the current truck was High Country only.       Here is the Trail Boss interior.  Memory seats and Super Cruise are present.  All things the LT Trail Boss it replaces, and the RST it was based on didn't get on the current gen.  You had to go to LTZ or ZR2 for memory seats, and High Country for Super Cruise.      
    • I installed a Hellwig rear sway bar on my 21 Sierra SLT, it made a huge difference on how the truck handles, no body roll, the trucks much more planted now. Not sure of the suspension differences between the 21 and 26,  if its body roll your having a sway bar will solve it. 
    • So a follow up and my fix. I found in online searches the live data to look at on a scan tool to verify the fuel tank pressure sensor was working.  It showed an spec number towards the lower end of the rang, but in spec.  Then while it was running opened the gas cap and the pressure should change.  It didn't change even a tiny bit.  The data for the purge valve said it was open...never changed. So then I measured the voltages on the plug for the fuel pressure sensor and they matched what it should be.  So local car quest parts had the sensor in stock...it was a bit of a pain to remove and an even bigger one to get it to actually go back in.  It helped to unbolt the driveshaft and bungie cord away from the gas tank to give a bit more room to work. So fuel tank pressure sensor in I cleared the code, and started it up.  I went to the scan tool's live data and... Eureka! The pressure number was different and fluctuated a bit.  So took it on a short drive and pressure number varied saw the purge valve go from closed to open and back to closed.  Drove it to and from work for roughly a week plugged in the scan tool no codes.  I took it in to get tested and passed.  In my state's infinite wisdom (oops meant greed), since I pushed the test with the maximum extensions I have to take it back in by Feb '27 to 'get it back up to date', then my next test won't be until Feb '29. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...