Jump to content

Lessons Learned When Buying Used


emtrichel1213

Recommended Posts

Posted

After reading the threads on this forum, I wouldn't buy a used truck...

 

;)

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

I had a conversation with one of my kids the other day about buying a used car. I told her for a DD buy new or CPO. I explained when you can buy a new car for under 15K a CPO for less there's no reason to take a chance on used when your money is tight. A second vehicle or toy used is fine. Nothing worse than having one car that breaks down.

Posted

Personal choice buying used. I have never had a bad one. I would rather look for a clean used for months than take the deprecation hit on a new one.

Just got back from a trip to the mountains,went to our second home to check things out. Left at 6 am, drove freeway and county roads up, 50 - 80 mph. Back roads back down to town, twisty mountain roads, 30- 60 mph.

Smooth as butter, 4 wheel to get in driveway.

 

57 k miles on it, bought with 41 k miles Nov. 2015. Remainder of drive train warranty until mid 2018 or 100 k miles.

 

:happysad::happysad:

Posted

My biggest concern when buying a nice used truck is the potential for it to have been modded & seen a programmer to improve performance, which means a good potential for early transmission/drive train failure. ESPECIALLY among the diesels. Right now, scanning the computer to see when the latest software/access was made generally isn't on the to do list of a per-purchase vehicle inspection.

Posted

So let me get this right. You had the brakes done because they were bad and that was the only thing wrong with the truck?

 

The fact you paid 600$ for a brake job that takes an hour to do both sides and $250 for the parts is unbelievable, if you were closer Id help ya out.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

My biggest concern when buying a nice used truck is the potential for it to have been modded & seen a programmer to improve performance, which means a good potential for early transmission/drive train failure. ESPECIALLY among the diesels. Right now, scanning the computer to see when the latest software/access was made generally isn't on the to do list of a per-purchase vehicle inspection.

And this is why I would NEVER buy a used diesel pickup...personal choice.

 

I've read countless horror stories of guys buying used Dodge Cummins' that were "dusted" from running K&N filters, had CP3 and electronic issues from programmers and/or spliced boxes, all sorts of trans issues, toasted turbos, damaged injectors, yada, yada, yada. I was on the diesel forums for many years, and it wasn't uncommon for someone to post about buying a new truck then adding something like a Smarty, installing the 230hp tune with no other mods, running the living snot out of it for 20k miles, then pulling the program and trading it at the first sign of a problem...and the poor sucker that bought that used truck got screwed.

 

And it's not just diesels, look at the gassers that have programmers on them. And then read about what some are trying to tow...

 

It's personally too risky for me to buy used...especially trucks.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Running a K&N or CAI won't cause damage unless you over oil the damn thing. Which is what most people do that cause problems with the MAF. Otherwise I agree 100%

Posted

 

 

Running a K&N or CAI won't cause damage unless you over oil the damn thing.

 

K&N filters were notorious for passing dirt, they were originally intended for race cars that were periodically rebuilt. So dirt ingestion wasn't a concern.

 

I had an early one in my 95 Cummins, you could wipe dirt out of the intake...that was a new out of the box filter, it was in less than 5k miles before I shot it down the road. I've never ran an aftermarket filter since.

 

K&N has since changed its media...the original stuff was thin and had visible holes in the media...it was more a screen.

 

Doesn't apply anymore, just some history...

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...