Jump to content

Ford Now Offers 3.5-liter EcoBoost Raptor Engine In F-150 Limited


Recommended Posts

Posted

ford ecoboost turbo image.jpeg

 

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
7-30-2018

 

Ford will now offer its top engine in the F-150 Limited, not just the Raptor. The engine develops 450 hp and 510 lb-ft of torque. Ford claims this makes its F-150 Limited “The most powerful light-duty pickup in America.” This power and torque is up from the 375 hp and 470 lb-ft of torque in the other F-150 trims with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine.

ford 3.5 liter high output.jpeg

The torque of the Ford F-150 Limited with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine tops its new 3.0-liter Powerstroke Diesel, which has 440 ft-lbs at 1,750 RPMs.

 

“F-150 Limited customers create their own success. The truck is their reward,” said Todd Eckert, Ford truck group marketing manager. “They wanted more power, so we combined Raptor’s engine with Limited’s business-class features to deliver Baja fierceness, boardroom style and the grit to tackle tough jobs.”

ford 10 speed auto truck trans.jpeg

Ford's 3.5-liter high output engine is mated to its 10-speed automatic transmission.  

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Good for them, looks like my 6.2L is no longer king of the truck world. Maybe it's time for GM to offer an LT4 in top trim? I would happily pay a $10k upcharge on an SLT or Denali for an LT4 (or even a non-hademade version of it) and some big brakes. If GM did this in a decent volume, I am sure they could do it at that price point. Ram is planning to drop a Hellcat version of their 1500, hopefully GM will play ball too because I don't want a Dodge product or a V6. Our roads are not meant for Corvettes up here, so powerful pickups are what we buy for toys too.

 

Is this Raptor engine really anything special like forged internals and upgraded turbos? Or is it just a hot tune/added boost in a regular 3.5L?    

Posted

How about putting it in the Expedition and Navigator? These 2 vehicles always need more power and would most certainly move me away from a 6.2 Denali. The 5.4 Ford led me away.  The 2 SUV's already have the 10 speed and are built in the same plant.

Posted

Does is come with the leaking oil pan, rough shifting trans too?  Or the inevitable Cam Phaser fiasco and the dreaded FERD timing chain Rattle?  I just wondering because some even have the vibes?  I am pretty content with my old cheap 5.3L single cam GM engine which has cost me nothing in 63K other than routine maintenance....

Posted
8 hours ago, mookdoc6 said:

Does is come with the leaking oil pan, rough shifting trans too?  Or the inevitable Cam Phaser fiasco and the dreaded FERD timing chain Rattle?  I just wondering because some even have the vibes?  I am pretty content with my old cheap 5.3L single cam GM engine which has cost me nothing in 63K other than routine maintenance....

The fanboy act gets old. I'm no fan of the EcoBoost concept but power wise it blows anything GM has out of the water. 

Posted
4 hours ago, MikeNH said:

The fanboy act gets old. I'm no fan of the EcoBoost concept but power wise it blows anything GM has out of the water. 

Nope!~  Never gets old.....It's a GM forum....They put me through College?  FERD did not!  About the only thing they blow away is TV commercials and millennial backing because they don't know anything other than BAILOUT?  

Posted
On 7/31/2018 at 7:25 PM, MikeNH said:

The fanboy act gets old. I'm no fan of the EcoBoost concept but power wise it blows anything GM has out of the water. 

It may be a big performer but the reliability has been awful. The 2.7 is just as bad if not worse with all the issues with the heads and valves.

 

Posted

The F150 is still a piece of shit.  They can sell them in large numbers but they don't last in large numbers.  Long term reliability and getting the job done RIGHT is where GM Trucks shines over Ford. 

Posted

I don’t drink the cool-aid. I did enjoy my 14 GMC when I had it. Saying Fords are junk is laughable, you don’t stay number 1 without repeat buyers. Without repeat buyers you don’t stay number 1. You can still get a V8 in a Ford, and no tricks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
    • "Life is getting back to normal."    I'm driving again and all new joints are operating as expected for this stage of recovery.   My most recent joint replacement still requires a lot of attention but experience has taught me that time will quiet the remaining pain.  I joked with my surgeon that another joint replacement would take my mind off my most recent surgery and he responded by saying the next will be a hip!  There are no plans for another surgery but, unlike me, I don't think he was joking!  I certainly wouldn't refuse further replacement  if required but hope to spend time out of the "post-op"  period.  I can't stress enough that if you have been recommended for total hip, knee or shoulder replacement that you welcome the offer.  Post-op "recovery" may sound daunting and painful, however, this is far better than the insidious erosion of mobility you are currently experiencing.  Imagine what it would feel like to wake up most mornings feeling better and more mobile than you did the previous day!  Prior to my first surgery in June 2025, even getting out of bed was becoming a formidable task.  Since the day after my first surgery, I get out of bed everyday easily and unassisted.  Making the switch to feeling a little better each day rather than a little worse, is hugely motivating!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...