Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/16/2019 at 6:48 PM, 17Allterrainx said:

Installed the AT4 Rough Country 2” leveling kit. These are the after results!

461AA8EB-2EEF-48DE-8DB0-ABB40C46D9D4.jpeg

How do you like the Rough Country kit I was thinking about going with it for my RST

On 8/16/2019 at 6:48 PM, 17Allterrainx said:

Installed the AT4 Rough Country 2” leveling kit. These are the after results!

461AA8EB-2EEF-48DE-8DB0-ABB40C46D9D4.jpeg

 

Posted
2.5" level kit and 1" wheel spacer up front.
Rear left stock.
 
OEM LT rims with 35x12.5's
8970.thumb.jpeg.05e40c5a5378a654c1de057284009794.jpeg
8955.thumb.jpeg.a177e7cc8b5c083ca6202b689dfb2659.jpeg
Look great! Any rubbing issues with the 35s? Did you use the spacers for clearance issues or just for looks?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Posted
8 hours ago, Rwood1 said:

How do you like the Rough Country kit I was thinking about going with it for my RST

 

For the price you can’t beat it. I haven’t had any issues but I have noticed a slight humming coming from the front wheels at like 90+ mph. Idk if its the wind hitting it or what. Haven’t really looked into it.

Posted

If anyone is interested I have  a brand new Suspension Maxx leveling kit for the 2019 denali 1500. It is a 2.5 in front and 1.5 in back. I have the full kit still in box Im just deciding against putting it on because I do not think it will fit in my garage if I install it. If anyone is interested let me know.

Posted
On 11/13/2019 at 8:21 PM, JR09country said:

Look great! Any rubbing issues with the 35s? Did you use the spacers for clearance issues or just for looks?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

Rubbing? Oh yeah! The spacers were needed for clearance at the upper control arm. Could've got by with 1/2" but I wanted the front out a little bit. Along with that and the front only lift/level, I was shooting for a stance similar to the baja trucks. Without the mudflap mod, I still had only 22-23° of turn availible till I could hear rubbing. After removing the rear fender mounting bracket and pulling the inside of the mudflap to the frame rail, I get 35ish° which is almost full lock.

Posted (edited)

2” Motofab up front. 2” Motofab blocks on rear.
(I like a little rake)

Cooper Discoverer ATP 275/60R20

295880B3-9F7C-46A6-8030-4045259785C8.jpeg

Edited by Method2Madness
  • Like 4
Posted
On 11/21/2019 at 2:01 AM, 17Allterrainx said:

Replaced the OEM Bridgestone Duelers for 35” Nitto Ridge Grapplers. 2” RC AT4 leveling kit. Zero rub.

97993EB1-C1CC-4AAC-A2D9-A4C1CF08E6F2.jpeg

FB05DC62-029B-4613-9BD5-022D39DB26F6.jpeg

Are those 11.50’s or 12.50’s? 

Posted (edited)

Went back out and took a pic in nearly the same spot as I took the before pic. 
 

(2” leveling up front, 2” block in rear)

 

 

5E8209A2-C183-4A27-8DC3-564BFA870A18.jpeg

 

 

D40B591D-DB21-4949-AFC5-8A79E38BCD9E.jpeg

Edited by Method2Madness
  • Like 4
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 11/4/2019 at 11:03 AM, Silver2019 said:

Please do!

 

On 11/7/2019 at 9:10 PM, econometrics said:

Yeah! More pics, please! I have the exact same truck and have been wondering what it would look like with a 1.5” and 285 or 295 tires! 

Can you post some additional pictures? Id be doing a similar setup. 

Posted
On 11/21/2019 at 2:01 AM, 17Allterrainx said:

Replaced the OEM Bridgestone Duelers for 35” Nitto Ridge Grapplers. 2” RC AT4 leveling kit. Zero rub.

97993EB1-C1CC-4AAC-A2D9-A4C1CF08E6F2.jpeg

FB05DC62-029B-4613-9BD5-022D39DB26F6.jpeg

How does the ride and handle compare to the OEM duelers? I have an older Tahoe that rides like crap since I added 10 ply tires...wanna avoid that mistake with my new truck...

Posted
On 11/7/2019 at 9:13 PM, Chance1025 said:

This is my Trailboss, with the black parts deleted, and a 1.5” level on 285/65r20 KO2’s. Love the ride. Feels like stock.

F9148B14-14ED-43C1-B2EC-05E0368AEF7E.jpeg

Dang, that looks nice. Did you notice a big drop in power with the heavier tires? How about ride quality and handling? I want the exact same look on my 5.3 LTZ. I wanna go with the same tires as you or the 35x11.5x20 ridge grapplers. Thanks!

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, ausomecasey said:

Dang, that looks nice. Did you notice a big drop in power with the heavier tires? How about ride quality and handling? I want the exact same look on my 5.3 LTZ. I wanna go with the same tires as you or the 35x11.5x20 ridge grapplers. Thanks!

Thanks man! I have always loved these BFGs. I got the 285’s and honestly they do look a hair small. They are a tall tire, but just a tad skinny in my opinion. I did that on purpose though, because they offer a little less weight (drag) and better fuel economy than the 35x12.50’s in the same tire. Power loss is negligible. Ride is close to stock, but with the 10plys and the leveling kit it’s a bit stiffer. I’m running them at 35psi cold, which has helped some. Handling is nearly the same. A touch more body roll, but that’s bc the center of gravity is higher, and I kinda like that fee anyway.
 

I have had BFGs on my last three trucks, and know how great a tire they are. But I LOVE the way the Nitto Ridge’s look. If they weren’t so heavy I prob would have bought the Ridge Grapplers in 35x12.50’s.

Edited by Chance1025
Posted
Thanks man! I have always loved these BFGs. I got the 285’s and honestly they do look a hair small. They are a tall tire, but just a tad skinny in my opinion. I did that on purpose though, because they offer a little less weight (drag) and better fuel economy than the 35x12.50’s in the same tire. Power loss is negligible. Ride is close to stock, but with the 10plys and the leveling kit it’s a bit stiffer. I’m running them at 35psi cold, which has helped some. Handling is nearly the same. A touch more body roll, but that’s bc the center of gravity is higher, and I kinda like that fee anyway.

 

I have had BFGs on my last three trucks, and know how great a tire they are. But I LOVE the way the Nitto Ridge’s look. If they weren’t so heavy I prob would have bought the Ridge Grapplers in 35x12.50’s.

 

I’ve had two sets of Nitto Ridge Grapplers, both had their siping wear very fast and started slipping with almost 15k - 16k miles on them, you’d be better off with KO2’s.

 

KO2’s have siping that runs straight through the lugs

d75e86c0a9d4863ef0a8a0dce13a5900.jpg

 

The Nitto Ridge Grapplers siping reminds me of an after thought and wear quickly

New

915a04da4c56ae8e728990d7c69844d5.png

 

With 16k miles on them, siping wearing prematurely creating slippery nerve racking moments.

8bc6cbaa28ad96de1dd1a3d1a0fe6944.jpg

 

There was a study done by a marketing firm some years back, people prefer the chunky sidewall and that’s why Nitto Ridge Grapplers became such a big hit but it’s a phase, stick with experience and you’ll be fine.

 

 

 

Sent from Above

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...