Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Not even worth the comparison Bridgestone vs. Goodyear    Goodyear's are straight garbage!!


They make good car tires [emoji16]really like my super car 3s


Ryan B.
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Philipgonzales3 said:

I'm in Texas (San Antonio).  We don't get any snow here at all lol.  Winter tires are literally not a thing here.  Didn't even know it was a thing until my mid 20's when I started looking into new vehicles lol.  

You would think so though with all the guys who buy 4wd down here and never leave the pavement, for that one ice storm every 5+ years is a wasteful option for most.

 

OP, the 18's will ride better, be cheaper and lighter than the 20's setup. Not to mention they will be less prone to damage. Exact ride differences between the two brands is probably negligible as GM has particular parameters that tires need to meet.

 

Tyler

Edited by amxguy1970
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


They make good car tires emoji16.pngreally like my super car 3s


Ryan B.

 

Maybe on cars or sport cars being 180 treadwear?  Even if I had a sports car it would be Michelin's.   

Posted
Maybe on cars or sport cars being 180 treadwear?  Even if I had a sports car it would be Michelin's.   


These work flawlessly on the track

799801bcfb9f1109d5d6c5eb5575cf5c.jpg


Ryan B.
  • Like 1
Posted

Just to muddy the water, I love Michelin LTX M/S. They handle all types of weather and are QUIET. They feel great on the body but make the truck handle, not boatlike or big old Caddylike. They last a long tome too.

 

I regret being talked into Coopers by my dealer on the last go around.

 

I don;t know if the Michelin Defenders are as good, but I'm headed back there on the next go around.

 

I swore off Goodyears forever when I had a fairly new on split between the treadlines and I got screwed by Goodyear who wouldn't make good.  They haven't seen another dollar from our house in about 15 years.

Posted

Not to add another tire to the mix my 2019 with the 20” wheels came with the General HT2 been really happy with them really quiet and ride really nice. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I have the 20" Bridgestones on my 2020 RST CC.....

Very quiet and comfortable ride tire. 

 

Merged-01.thumb.jpg.11d0011e605c40234e7a4374a266b869.jpg

 

Edited by BigMick2020
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, amxguy1970 said:

You would think so though with all the guys who buy 4wd down here and never leave the pavement, for that one ice storm every 5+ years is a wasteful option for most.

 

OP, the 18's will ride better, be cheaper and lighter than the 20's setup. Not to mention they will be less prone to damage. Exact ride differences between the two brands is probably negligible as GM has particular parameters that tires need to meet.

 

Tyler

My Z-71 came with 18"s and have been replaced with the same. I like them. I want some meat to the tire sidewalls to avoid wheel damage not to mention it makes the ride around here better. In looking at "take-off" wheels/tires, again in 18", the Goodyears and Michelins that Chevy and GM uses are poorly rated by users on Tirerack. That might be why there are so many "take-offs" floating around for sale, some from model years up to 3 or 4 years old. The winters have made a mess of my wheels so I was hunting for new replacements but won't pay for the oem tires that don't get good opinions.

Edited by Beamie
  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/3/2020 at 10:57 AM, Philipgonzales3 said:

Why is that?  I like my goodyears but this is my first truck and nothing to compare it to.  So would be thankful for any further input you may have.   Also seems that there are more than one model of each tire out there.  At least I think. 

As with all mfg's they put about 40.00 dollars worth of tires on new vehicles for high volume sellers.  As for all comparable bottom tier OEM tires...Goodyears are just absolute junk!  

Posted

Goodyear is not totally junk. Come on people! The Dura Trac is a top rated tire in its category. The very hard to find Ultra Terrain is also very highly rated. Their Triple Tread passenger car tire was amazing years ago. 

Posted

In the past 5 years, I've had 3 experiences with Goodyear. 

 

1st, on my '78 911. The tires were high performance rated. They had plenty of traction and rode smooth. Due to a staggered wheel configuration on my car, the rears wore a little quicker but that's normal for these cars (60% weight bias on rear) No complaints.

 

2nd, I had an old Tacoma with a new set of Goodyear Wranglers. The tires wore unevenly and quickly. Less than 30,000 miles and they were getting thin. I'm a retired man so I'm not rough on my vehicles and maintain them as per the manual. No problems with truck suspension, alignment or tire rotation schedule.......not impressed with Goodyear.

 

3rd, sold Tacoma and had a Honda Ridgeline. New Goodyear Wranglers. Tires lasted 2 years, less than 25,000 miles. 2 tires had belt separation and all had dry rot cracks despite being only 2 years old as per the DOT date codes on the tires. I was very thankfully pro-rated on my next set of tires.  Again, not happy with Goodyear. 

 

Now I have the 2020 Silverado. No Goodyears. 

 

 

Posted

Everybody has an opinion. Here is my experience. I've owned the trucks with both the Goodyear Trailrunner AT, and the Bridgestone Dueler AT. Both are good tires. Getting the same service life out both, and ride and comfort are pretty much the same, although I think the Goodyear rides a little better. The Trailrunner is the least expensive of the two tires when you go to replace them, and for no more difference in performance or longevity I would purchase the Trailrunner for that reason alone.

I have been driving for over 35 years and have nothing but high praise for the Goodyear Wrangler branded tires over the years. Have owned several different versions of the Wranglers over the years, and they have performed flawlessly. The same can't be said about my experience with Goodyear's passenger car and performance tires over the years. I just have not had the same luck with them as the Wranglers, and will never purchase a Goodyear branded tire of any kind for my passenger/performance cars.

Posted (edited)

Between drag radials, course tires, and everyday highway tires, I've purchased my fair share of Goodyear brand tires and I have had great experiences with all of them.  Though your results may vary, I feel as though Goodyear is a good, quality brand of tire.  Heck, the Duratrac's are quite possibly one of the best off-road oriented street tires made, read any reviews from any site and you will find this to be true. 

 

I really do like my Bridgestones, as mentioned in a prior post on this same topic, but I wouldn't hesitate to put a good year tire on my truck as well.

Edited by Gangly
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I think there may be a significant difference in the Goodyears that the car manufacturers put on and the ones that people buy retail in upgrading from oem. It's understandable that any specialty tire, like race tires and serious off roade tires are going to be built to a different standard than the ones intended for old folks who have Toro mowers.

 

I mentioned before that my experience with consumer grade/oems was bad and the company did not stand behind manufacturing defects so not giving them a second chance. Michelins have never disappointed in truck LTX tires and they are outstanding in the snow.

Edited by Beamie
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...